Originally Posted by Irish Stout
I think his point of
had more to do with the non-sequitor. But perhaps he knows an internet sports argument rule I am unfamiliar with. Let me check the rule book...
Ok, I found it. Here:
Rule 12.3(a) - Use of Non Sequential Arguments Where Relevance Appears Lacking - Exceptions:
"When arguing the strengths and weaknesses of any team, it is always fair for a homer to point out that certain players were not drafted by the current FO. In such a situation it automatically nullifies any weaknesses of that player and strengthens the homer's argument."
Gotcha, I totally missed the point. Thanks for pointing that out. Carry on