Originally Posted by baja
It's called testimony by qualified scientists .
Your proof is a click away choose to remain ignorant if you like.
Oooh. Now appeals to (likely false) authority. You're moving up in the fallacy world.
If the treatment worked the way claimed, the data would be there to support it -- trivially. You wouldn't have to rely on appeals to authority, appeals to emotion, etc. Why is that so hard for you to understand?