Originally Posted by IHaveALight
Even if this were true. What's the problem with giving parents the choice to let their child die on chemo or let him die under supervision of Burzynski?
At the very least, do your self a favor and watch the first 3 and a half minutes of this.
If they try the conventional treatments and they fail then I'm all for any alternatives. The problem comes when people immediately go to the alternatives. In this case neither option would have likely saved the child but there are MANY parents so distrusting of modern medicine they will jump at any alternative even when there are scientifically proven and reliable treatments available to them and their children. The law has to step in and protect the patient first. Especially when they are unable to decide for themselves.