Originally Posted by Blueflame
Name one city that doesn't have a leash law. As noted above, I don't even live in a city but there's a leash law here (county ordinance) and owners are held responsible if their dogs are loose.
The dog's owner did not ensure that the dog could not escape. It was his responsibility to do that... just as it was his responsibility to make sure the dog had food and water.
Your position that dogs should be free to roam wherever they want to go is untenable. The law simply doesn't see it that way.
I'm unfamiliar with the word "repsobiler". Please provide the definition.
Its a well know fact not all city have leash laws. Texas does not have a state-wide leash law.
it matters on the city
Now look at my state law.
"It is unlawful for any dog to run at large in New Hampshire, except (1) when the dog is accompanied by its owner or a custodian; or (2) where the dog is being used for, or being trained for, hunting, herding, or supervised competition and exhibition."
I never once said a dog should be able to free roam and you are insutling my spelling and grammar you should be ashamed of yourself. your reaching out to insult me since you have no augrement Its also respobility of people in the street not to go around killing animals. again you act like the owner let the dog run for the hell of it is your issue.