Originally Posted by critter171
one he was not the neighbors property second we don't know the law in that city at all. the human had no right to kill an animal period you seem not to understand my points as your jumping to assumption.
edit: at least i don't need to make up bs stuff to argue unlike you.
All cities have leash laws.
The dog was running loose to hump the neighbor's dog.... nowhere did the story say that the "hump-ee" was also running loose.
Two people were responsible for the dog's death:
1. The owner for letting the dog run loose and
2. The psycho who killed the dog.
Both are responsible.