Originally Posted by bloodsunday
I won't even bother arguing with this kind of logic.
or maybe I will... There is not a talent evaluator in the HISTORY of the NFL that would have picked Tebow over Peyton after reviewing their first 16 games as a pro. To try and compare the two is beyond absurd.
You have a much better shot arguing that Peyton is old and injured and Tebow is young and still somewhat unknown.
That is not an argument, that is the truth. TT is young and unproven and PM is old and injured. One is under contract for a few million the next 3 years, the other will require the estimated GDP of a small island nation to sign.
Point being, does PM carry enough upside to justify the move, given that 2/3'rds of the roster is incomplete?