View Single Post
Old 01-31-2012, 02:03 PM   #130
Miss I.
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 7,519
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
The problem is the movie itself was a betrayal of Michael's character. It's like it was trying to meld the Godfather universe with the popularity of later movies like Wall Street... drawing political equivalences between Mobsters and Executives.

As far as the character goes, it's hard to visualize how Michael goes from the guy at the end of Godfather II to a hobnobbing high-society type, with no credible bridge built in between. It seems like they built it all up to tear it down in the name of teaching a moral lesson, ala Wall Street.

But Godfathers I and II were windows into a dark world. Part 3 was a condescending tack-on that tried to moralize the whole thing after the fact.
this I agree with. Plus honestly Al Pacino was at his overacting most annoying in it. He was so much better in the first two, very veiled violence ready to explode...Wasn't the abortion in part 2? I might be foggy on this.
Miss I. is offline   Reply With Quote