Originally Posted by hambone13
What I don't understand is that you have to reference impotence so regularly as a reverse insult while you hold your "lady" flag as one of the of the few reasons why you ban people. It seems a bit dichotomous, philosophically as an objective banning element.
OK... I referenced "impotent sputtering" with a clear meaning that his outrage would yield nothing of value. It's a huge stretch to suggest that the intent behind my words was in any way a commentary on the Rev's virility. If he happens to have a problem with ED, I do not want to know about it.
And if I "regularly reference impotence as a reverse insult" then surely you can provide a second example of it.
You might have a point if I'd told him to go and buy some Rogaine (which would
be an insult based solely on gender).
Regardless, clearly my comment offended, so I apologize.