Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ
1. Again, no link to this article. IMHO it's nothing more than an editorial opinion piece and until you show me the actual article it means nothing. The New Yorker Magazine (a great mag no doubt) is as liberal as you can get.
2. Here is the only proof the Koch has provided financial assistance to the Tea Party. But my point is still valid and you haven't proven jack crap. My point is this: YOU HAVE NO PROOF THAT THE TEA PARTY IS NOTHING MORE THAN A NEO-CON PUPPET. Sorry to b**** slap you about this.
3. Jane Mayer writes for the New Yorker Magazine. How come she's not concerned about who is behind the OWS movement? Why does the Tea Party have to divulge any of it's financial supporters?
4. But you are nitpicking my friend, you very much are. The above wiki link proves nothing. It's based on an opinion piece written by the New Yorker Magazine. Until you can show how much Koch and other's have organized, directed and financied the Tea Party you have nothing but speculation based on heresay via a liberal magazine.
The New Yorker is one of the most respected journalism sources in the world, and has been for almost a hundred years. What you are saying is that you will not accept any opinion that you don't already agree with, regardless of the source.