Ok, the full story does help me understand the verdict. But I'm still surprised they didn't go the manslaughter route.
During the closing arguments, Prater played for jurors again the security camera recordings of the shooting. He stopped it at points, telling jurors the pharmacist turned his back to the downed robber to get a second gun to shoot the robber again.
“It's a human trait. You don't turn your back on something you're afraid of,” Prater said.
Prosecutors told jurors Ersland lied to police about what happened during the shooting, trying to come up with a good story to cover his wrongdoing. They said he underestimated how much homicide detectives would investigate.
They also reminded jurors he had lied about killing people during the first Gulf War. They said his military records show he was at Altus Air Force Base in 1991 and never was in combat.
Prosecutors also reminded jurors of testimony Ersland had faked a gunshot wound in an effort to support his defense. “He lies about everything,” Prater said.
Box conceded that the pharmacist has said some “goofy things” and had facts wrong in his police interview and about his military record. He argued that didn't change what the pharmacist perceived inside the pharmacy.
Jurors were given the option of finding Ersland guilty of first-degree manslaughter instead or of acquitting him completely.
Read more: http://newsok.com/oklahoma-city-phar...#ixzz1NaelI5In