Originally Posted by W*GS
This is the same Jeff Prager who claims
Total lunatic. Certifiable nutjob. Insane, in a clinical sense.
And gaffe is a fanboy. Of course.
This thread is about 9/11 --- not ***ushima.
You need to STFU and review the evidence Prager has presented. He has shown that the elements found in the WTC dust correspond to the break down products -- not only the type but also in the correct ratios -- at every point in the chain.
If his analysis is correct -- the matter is solved. The signature of fission is unique. The USGA never attempted to explain what they found in the WTC dust. Nor did Dr Thomas Cahill from UC Davis -- tho he pointed out that his Delta team had never seen the elements and nano particles they found at the WTC before, not anywhere. This was not typical air pollution from fossil fuels or any other familiar source.
You need to stick with facts and explain why Prager's analysis is wrong. Give me particulars. Your standard harangue is not good enough.