Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN
Surely you're not trying to argue that I'm on record supporting virtually every claim ever made by every truther?
You, on the other hand, have never been willing to admit that there might be some problems with the official BushCo account, as far as I can tell (show me where I'm wrong on that account if you like.)
Well, that's because first of all there is no "Official BushCo account." There is a worldwide
accepted narrative that is based on the evidence. So let's just drop that pretense.
Secondly, do I concede there was some arse-covering in the 911 Commission Report? Of course. Does that mean that 9-11 was an inside jobby-job? No, it doesn't.
You don't seem to be on board with every wacko truther CT, I agree. But, like with Gaffney, you are unwilling to admit that the debunker side has something worthwhile to say.
For example, when I suggested that you debate the issue on JREF you responded:
In any event, yours is the same tediously circular reasoning, i.e., "those well prepared to debate the issue" = those who share The Lone Bolt's commitment to the official BushCo account as a foregone conclusion.
You characterise the JREF posters as "committed to the official BushCo account as a foregone conclusion."
Once again, what do you base this on?
Have you debated them? Have you even bothered to listen to anything they have to say with an open mind?
Apparently there is one reason and one reason only that you smear them as "committed to the official BushCo account":
They disagree with you.
That's it. The only reason.
This is solid evidence that the basic truther position that the "gubmit dunnit" is unassailable to you. You are unable to consider any other possibility.
Do you deny it?