Originally Posted by TonyR
No, the problem with your "logic" here is that he wasn't very marketable three weeks ago, either. Injury, legal issues, and demanding a new contract. Not things many, if any, teams are looking to give up a lot of value for. The only thing you're right about is that his value has decreased.
They did the right thing by not trading him then, and hopefully they'll do the right thing and not trade him now. Unless somebody is willing to give up a lot for him, which is extremely unlikely.
You're right but was his vaulue more three weeks ago or today? The answer was that he value was much greater three weeks ago.