Originally Posted by Killericon
If any of you are planning on going to see "Taken", and are expecting a "good" movie rather than an "entertaining" movie(Like I was, due to it's high IMDB score), you should correct that.
Okay so shouldn't a good movie be entertaining? How do you define good? Just curious. I enjoyed Taken, but I also expected it to be basically an action flick with a better actor as lead. I think Liam Neeson's presence gave it more heft because unlike say a Tom Cruise who is not by any means a good actor (capable sometimes, but mostly a one note actor...he always plays Tom Cruise megastar).
Good Action: Bourne Identity? , Entertaining Action: Speed?