Originally Posted by TheReverend
This article makes me so mad.
The spelling of "fibonacci" alone should be red flags to the sources credibility.
He doesn't and didn't. The mathematical community that he criticizes is rightly unaccepting because it's absurd psycho babble. Much like the numerologists that devote their lives to arguing about 666 and whether its a reference to Nero, or whatever flavor of the week. It's stupid, you can twist any number to anything you'd like.
He should re-double his efforts back into whittling. Colossal failure at this endeavor.
have you been to the Pocono's ?