Originally Posted by lex
I think Collinsworth got this wrong. If the play was initially called an INT, then there would have to be conclusive evidence that it was simultaneous possession. None of the replays I looked at provided that. The best angle I saw showed Chambers' elbow on the ground but you couldnt really see if Chambers had the ball and Champ didnt.
There was no way to overturn the call anyways IMO. You can't tell from what I saw if Chambers had possession when he went down.