Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang
This makes no sense. No one would argue giving him steriods to help battle cancer, but whats that have to do with 6 tour de france victories? I assume everyone in cycling was doping, its so rampant there
I am giving the guy a pass because he won a bigger battle than the Tour de France. Whats hard to understand about that?
Plus I am not a cycling fan, so I dont care about tainted athletes in that sport
I am not a big baseball guy either, but I do care more about that sport and feel Bonds (who never suffered anything like cancer) had no reasons to use roids outside of cheating pure and simple.