05-02-2007, 02:05 PM
Self Appointed Expert
Join Date: Aug 2003
Originally Posted by orange 4 life
the whole thing, but whatever. im too tired and too angry.
"two marauding pits." there's no slant there right?
gimme a break. its a fvkking 11 year olds IDEA of what happened and a writers anti pit spin.
you think this little damn terrier is gonna keep two "marauding" pits away from a luscious 4 year old prey? uh huh. okay.
its bull**** through and through, and it just further perpetuates the lies already being spread about the breed.
further, if we STOP fvkkkers like vick from breeding these dogs, then we'll only be left with loving owners, and of course EVERY neutral source agrees that the breed is NOT by nature violent, so all these stories (many arent stories, some are) stop.
what happens if vicks 66 dogs had gotten out?
then pitbulls would be called "marauders" because THOSE pits have the potential to get confused and attack, when in reality ANY breed abused and starved and bred for fighting would be unpredictable.
again, why didnt we hear about pits in the 60's, 70's, 80's, and much of the 90's?
because then it was dobermans or rottys that took the bad rap. THOSE were the dogs that a$$holes bought so they could put a studded collar on 'em and try to make themselves feel tough. now its pits, and it fvkkking pisses me off considering the breed is by nature smart, loving, and EXTREMELY docile.
Its because they are the current "headline grabber".