Originally Posted by Atlas
I don't blame Darden or Clark. There are no lawyers in the world that could have convinced that jury OJ was guilty...
I respectfully disagree. Clark and Darden were a couple of woefully mediocre lawyers who were far more interested in playing to the camera than to the jury.
Of course, even more than that, they were politicians, and they actually boosted their otherwise floundering careers by playing to the public.
Quick. Without looking it up, tell me the name of the lawyer who WON the civil suit vs. O.J.
As far as the TV show goes, the one thing I can guarantee you will NOT hear is how O.J. actually committed the crime. He will state how he WOULD have done it in a manner that will be completely inconsistent with the evidence.
IOW, he'll say tat he would have killed these people at some other location, with a different weapon, on a different date, with a different alibi, yada, yada, yada.
Waste of time for everyone concerned.