The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community

The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/index.php)
-   Orange Mane Central Discussion (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=6)
-   -   Broncos: 2013 Easiest schedule (http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=110104)

02-07-2013 06:53 PM

Broncos: 2013 Easiest schedule
 
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...th-of-schedule

Carolina Panthers
.543 138-116-2
Detroit Lions
.539 138-118-0
New Orleans Saints
.539 137-117-2
St. Louis Rams
.539 137-117-2
Baltimore Ravens
.535 137-119-0
Green Bay Packers
.533 136-119-1
Arizona Cardinals
.520 131-121-4
Miami Dolphins
.520 133-123-0
San Francisco 49ers
.520 132-122-2
Minnesota Vikings
.516 132-124-0
Seattle Seahawks
.516 130-122-4
Cincinnati Bengals
.508 130-126-0
Jacksonville Jaguars
.508 129-125-2
New England Patriots
.508 130-126-0
Atlanta Falcons
.504 128-126-0
Chicago Bears
.502 128-127-1
Tampa Bay Buccaneers
.500 127-127-2
Washington Redskins
.498 127-128-1
New York Jets
.496 127-129-0
Philadelphia Eagles
.496 127-129-0
Cleveland Browns
.492 126-130-0
Pittsburgh Steelers
.496 126-130-0
Tennessee Titans
.488 124-130-2
New York Giants
.480 123-133-0
Dallas Cowboys
.480 121-134-1
Buffalo Bills
.473 121-135-0
Houston Texans
.473 120-134-2
Kansas City Chiefs
.473 121-135-0
Oakland Raiders
.469 120-136-0
Indianapolis Colts
.461 117-137-2
San Diego Chargers
.457 117-139-0
Denver Broncos
.430 110-146-0

gyldenlove 02-07-2013 06:59 PM

This means absolutely nothing, last year we had the 2nd hardest schedule going into the season and still wound up 13-3 playing only a handful of games against teams who went .500 or better.

02-07-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gyldenlove (Post 3794259)
This means absolutely nothing, last year we had the 2nd hardest schedule going into the season and still wound up 13-3 playing only a handful of games against teams who went .500 or better.

Its the offseason with nothing going on. This means everything!!!!:blueflame

El Guapo 02-07-2013 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gyldenlove (Post 3794259)
This means absolutely nothing, last year we had the 2nd hardest schedule going into the season and still wound up 13-3 playing only a handful of games against teams who went .500 or better.

Exactly what I was going to bring up. /thread

Kaylore 02-07-2013 09:30 PM

Yeah this means nothing. In fact almost all the bad teams get at least few games better, and many of the good teams will get worse at least a few games and some will suck (not ruling us out.) So this means nothing. These arguments about schedule difficulty don't mean anything.

02-07-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore (Post 3794350)
Yeah this means nothing. In fact almost all the bad teams get at least few games better, and many of the good teams will get worse at least a few games and some will suck (not ruling us out.) So this means nothing. These arguments about schedule difficulty don't mean anything.

Exactly it is such a broken record repeating the above I am blown away people still talk about SOS in the preseason.

Taco John 02-07-2013 11:04 PM

Superbowl baby.

sgbfan 02-07-2013 11:39 PM

They are the best team in the worst division. That alone will make their schedule look pretty easy.

02-08-2013 12:01 AM

I wouldn't say it means nothing. I'd say it doesn't mean very much.

Pick Six 02-08-2013 12:04 AM

We played cupcakes, during the last half of the season. One COULD make an argument that made us ill-prepared for the postseason...

NFLBRONCO 02-08-2013 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crushaholic (Post 3794389)
We played cupcakes, during the last half of the season. One COULD make an argument that made us ill-prepared for the postseason...

12 wins against cupcakes
1 win against a team switching OC's banged up players that missed the game.
0-4 against playoff teams

We aren't ready for primetime yet. It made our stars think they could go MIA and still win.

SonOfLe-loLang 02-08-2013 12:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crushaholic (Post 3794389)
We played cupcakes, during the last half of the season. One COULD make an argument that made us ill-prepared for the postseason...

Or...we lost on a fluke play in 5 degree weather and everyone is over reacting because **** just happens sometime in a singular football game


And we didn't just beat twelve "cupcakes," we annihilated them. And yes, the difference is important

And we were a diff team than we were in week 5

NFLBRONCO 02-08-2013 12:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SonOfLe-loLang (Post 3794392)
Or...we lost on a fluke play in 5 degree weather and everyone is over reacting because she just happens sometime in a singular football game


And we didn't just beat twelve "cupcakes," we annihilated them. And yes, the difference is important

What about the 1-4 aganst playoff teams that difference is important too. I don't buy we would have beaten HOU or NE either.

NFLBRONCO 02-08-2013 12:29 AM

We had a great season props but, our stars took a dump in moneytime no other excuse needed. My only hope they learn from it and come firing next year.

02-08-2013 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO (Post 3794394)
What about the 1-4 aganst playoff teams that difference is important too. I don't buy we would have beaten HOU or NE either.

We lost on a fluke play to the Super Bowl champs. They then destroyed the Patriots. Not sure why anyone would think we couldn't have beat them at home, but that's your business. And Houston? Hilarious!

SonOfLe-loLang 02-08-2013 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO (Post 3794394)
What about the 1-4 aganst playoff teams that difference is important too. I don't buy we would have beaten HOU or NE either.

We were a much diff team by week 16 than we were in week 5. As far as you "not buying" that we could beat hou or NE, who gives a ****? You're just being pessimistic and your thoughts are based on nothing.

If Baltimore had blown us out, you might have a point. But it was a fluke win during a game we did a lot wrong. (And the refs didn't help.). **** happens! And it happened to us. We were just as good as any of those teams and if we replayed that Balt game, id still bet Denver to win

LRtagger 02-08-2013 05:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO (Post 3794394)
What about the 1-4 aganst playoff teams that difference is important too. I don't buy we would have beaten HOU or NE either.

We beat the bengals too

BroncoInferno 02-08-2013 08:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO (Post 3794394)
What about the 1-4 aganst playoff teams that difference is important too. I don't buy we would have beaten HOU or NE either.

I think you are leaving off Cincy. 2-3 against playoff teams in the regular season. And, yes, we would have beaten Houston. They peaked about week ten and were a pretty mediocre team come playoff time. New England would have been a coin flip. And I'm getting sick of folks glossing over the fact the the refs jobbed us against Baltimore. Don't give me any "we should have overcome that" cliched crap. Baltimore's players get paid, too, and they were bound to make plays with the refs handing crap to them the whole game.

02-08-2013 08:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NFLBRONCO (Post 3794391)
12 wins against cupcakes
1 win against a team switching OC's banged up players that missed the game.
0-4 against playoff teams

We aren't ready for primetime yet. It made our stars think they could go MIA and still win.

If you haven't figured it out yet someday you will. There is a lot of luck that goes into Superbowl winning teams. Ravens were 2 plays away from missing playoffs. Denver brought C- game and still should of won.

Kaylore 02-08-2013 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DENVERDUI55 (Post 3794353)
Exactly it is such a broken record repeating the above I am blown away people still talk about SOS in the preseason.

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104965

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104953

There's some good reading in there. Some had it about right. Others were way off (Cutthemdown said we'd be lucky to get nine wins).

NFLBRONCO 02-08-2013 09:59 AM

Good points made we'll see.

02-08-2013 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore (Post 3794485)
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104965

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104953

There's some good reading in there. Some had it about right. Others were way off (Cutthemdown said we'd be lucky to get nine wins).

You know what is funny the two hardest preseason schedules I thought Denver had was 05 and this year and they won 13.

ZONA 02-08-2013 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crushaholic (Post 3794389)
We played cupcakes, during the last half of the season. One COULD make an argument that made us ill-prepared for the postseason...

No one could not say that. One stupid bone head play by 1 idiot and we're not even having this conversation.

ZONA 02-08-2013 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaylore (Post 3794485)
http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104965

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=104953

There's some good reading in there. Some had it about right. Others were way off (Cutthemdown said we'd be lucky to get nine wins).

Yeah what does he know anyway............hahaha, yeah boy fire away son :)

Hamrob 02-08-2013 06:46 PM

BRONCOS 2013 OPPONENTS

Maybe it's just me....but, after the AFC WEST games...this hardly looks like an easy schedule



HOME
Kansas City
Oakland
San Diego
Jacksonville
Tennessee
Philadelphia
Washington
Baltimore


AWAY
Kansas City
Oakland
San Diego
Houston
Indianapolis
Dallas
N.Y. Giants
New England


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.