![]() |
Simmons QB rankings
Quote:
|
Cincinnati is better than the Ravens and Denver beat them on the road. The Bengals have not lost since Denver beat them.
|
The whole he hasn't beat anyone is so played out. Dude was coming back from a career threatening injury and the NFL schedules the hard games right away. He is back what more does he need to prove to these experts?
|
Quote:
|
Elway has 6 superbowl games played? No mention of Terry Bradshaw instead Joe Montana's 4 rings are the record? Poorly edited article in my opinion.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Pittsburgh, New Orleans when they were hot, Cincinatti
|
I would rather play the Ravens than the Bangles in the playoffs and I would like least of all to play the Steelers.
I don't think the Ravens will win their division. |
Bill Simmons sucks bags of NE ***** for a living. Are any of us really surprised that he hates on Manning?
|
wow, he puts Peyton Manning in a tier so he can reference some dumbass movies? What a tard. The whole article is a waste of cyber space.
|
I actually think it was a well written section on Peyton. He gave him his due, and only put an asterisk on his tie at #1 because he hasn't beaten a top rated team.
I can sort of see the Bengals argument, but I would even take it a step further. I don't think Peyton will yet earn his respect even AFTER the beating he gives Baltimore this weekend. Like it or not, showdown time will only come in the playoffs this year. Bring it on! |
At the start of this looking on paper I thought we would be lucky to go 10-6, Maybe 11-5 if things worked out right. 8-8 if there were growing pains of if Peyton wasn't back to normal.
There are "playoff" teams like duh bears who lose or narrowly win against bad teams, Denver has taken care of business after sorting out things out after week 5. Also before week 5 we had a guy named Joe Mays starting at MLB. I don't blame him for singlehandly losing those 3 games but he had a lot to do with being out of position vs Pats and Houston being able to run on us. I love how Fox tweaked the team as the year went on, never being complacent or just content to show up and play the dudes he picked to start at the begining of the year. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
sorry but I take issue with the accuracy of this writers info.. therefore most of the rest of the article.. well not sure if any of the rest of his numbers are good either.. |
Quote:
He conviniently ignores the fact that the Broncos were competitve in the 3 losses and yes, the Broncos were still gelling at that time too. The packers record is worse than the Broncos and they are playing in a pretty mediocre if not weak division too. The pack have lost to the niners, the seahawks, the colts and the giants and they are on a 2 game losing streak. Rogers is having another good year but not so much better than Manning that he's in another tier. Meh, it's just a silly article IMHO. |
Quote:
Selective memory? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Yes he played but many of his teammates either did not or were playing out of position. His oline was jury rigged Mendenhall did not play, as mentioned before starting SS Clark did not play. Nor did Harrison play Hardly at full strength. |
The Bengals are 1 QB away from a really really good team. Dalton misses wide open guys ALL the time. I've watched 5 of their games and I always felt like if they had a QB even 1 level above Dalton, they would be leading that division right now.
|
Simmons is going to say Balt wasnt full strength but fact is we have taken care of business for the last 9 straight. Teams drop easy games (on paper) all the time.
|
| All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.