2016: Obama's America
 

<iframe width="420" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/tDY6v8KdSYs" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The liberals have spent far more time investigating any and all republicans than they ever have Obama. The reality is they know the guy is shady, but they don't want to know all about him for fear they will find out things that even they couldn't support, so better to help him hide those things in his past and instead attack any of his opponents. The goal for liberals isn't what is best for the country. It is all about power and keeping it so they can get their warped, nutty agendas passed.

Keep flinging the ****. Some of it is bound to stick. Ha!

"Our President is trapped in his father's time machine. Incredibly, the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman of the 1950s. This philandering, inebriated African socialist, who raged against the world for denying him the realization of his anticolonial ambitions, is now setting the nation's agenda through the reincarnation of his dreams in his son. The son makes it happen, but he candidly admits he is only living out his father's dream. The invisible father provides the inspiration, and the son dutifully gets the job done. America today is governed by a ghost." Dinesh D'Souza

The irony...

Bet you didn't watch it.

Of course the liberals won't watch it. Truths about Obama are inconvenient and don't fit what they want all of us to believe about him. They have spent more time about Romney's dog and McCain's temper than they ever have Obama's entire life. They believe Obama is so popular yet hard to find an unbiased poll where he even gets 50% approval or support. Yeah, he's been such a uniter as he promised.

The movie has a very good explanation for why they won't ask questions.

I've seen plenty of D'Souza's schtick. You think anybody on here is going to waste an hour and a half on that nutjob? Even the American Spectator called his bs a "ridiculous conspiracy theory." I did enjoy watching Hitchins take D'Souza apart in a debate, though.

You really believe that bs? A daddy Obama never met rules his life through invisible powers? No wonder this country is so ****ed up. Like the Australian Deputy PM, half the ****ing country has gone whackadoodle.

Just pure agitprop porno for the Right.

I did...after the fourth or fifth lie and the third assumption of this idiot I puked.

This guy couldn't connect the dots even as a kid........and this applies to the film maker and this turd I quoted.

Yeah, can you believe that?

After all, it's not like the right has some sort of credibility problem, or something.

/sarcasm

Lolololol. Remember Focus on the Family's '08 Letter from Obama's America in (dun dun dun) 2012!? Sooo prescient! How did they know!?

http://www.wnd.com/files/Focusletter.pdf

They say that like it's a bad thing. :D

At least this election cycle we aren't deluged with the cult of personality **** again.

What you mean, remmeber a song that went like that ?


You know if you think that finger waggin biatch in your avatar is cool you got a lot more problems than I suspected.

She would not have done that if he was white and if somebody did that to Bush your head would have exploded.

It's disrespectful period and his office deserves respect and you know it.

And the day I listen to a group of people who referred to GW Bush as a chimpanzee his entire tenure in office is the day I listen to manufactured outrage about a woman with a finger in the air. For that one, you can kiss my ass.

Secondly, yes, a song did go like that. During the 2008 campaign I was reminded of that song many times. The clown even hired swooning women for ****'s sake.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7xxgRUyzgs0

EDIT: This one also reminded me of the Obama campaign:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PWgvGjAhvIw

I heard Obama number #1 priority is to make us all wear tiger stripped snuggies, make a mullet the only haircut allowed in the US and replace the The Star-Spangled Banner with Bobby Brown's theme to Ghostbuster's II

An insult to chimps.

That fact that ant posted this BS proves he's just another fringe right-wing lunatic. D'Souza was long ago proved a fraud. I watched this crap for ****s and giggles a couple of weeks ago. Yeah, Obama's pappy who he barely knew is driving force behind his ideology, despite ZERO evidence to support that belief. Please. There's not a single fact in there, just the same old racist BS rehashed. Lunatic nincompoops like barryr will lap it up, of course.

LOL, butt hurt as they say apparently. When you have the uncontrolled impulse to constantly follow me around in threads just to post insults then I know you've lost. In an idiot liberals' mind, anything they don't like or agree with is "proven" to be wrong or a fraud. D'Souza dared to try to find out more about Obama while Obama supporters would rather deal with Romney's dog since they are afraid what would be found out about Obama. Obama has been president for almost 4 years and the liberal media still does little to find out about Obama and just takes his word when they rarely do that with anyone else, especially anyone that doesn't have a "d" by their name.

Do you know what a "fact" is? I'll help:

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact?s=t

D'Souza does not use "facts" in his presentation. He makes assertions about Obama's beliefs based on the history of a father whom he barely knew, and offers little of substance from Obama's own life to support that assertion. You see, when you make assertions that you can't support with facts, that's called "paranoia." That's called being a "conspiracy theorist."

Instead of your usual garbage, why don't you present a case using actual facts that proves D'Souza's assertions? You wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face.

Come to think of it, this is the problem with right-wingers in general. They don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact."

You could probably just watch the movie and answer your own questions. To simply say that D'Souza uses nothing in Obamas own life to support questions that D'Souza raises shows clearly you have not seen it. There are plenty of "facts" about Obamas past and present decisions he has made in the documentary.

No, there are not. Just more of that recycled Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers guilt-by-association crap. A "fact" would be showing an actual policy Obama has championed that fits the profile D'Souza is trying to push. He doesn't do it. Because it isn't there. Like I said, you right-wingers don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact," as you prove yet again.

Did you just post a pirated copy of a movie?

LOL