View Full Version : 911 Troofers condemend by UN Chief
DenverBrit
02-27-2011, 03:57 PM
There ya go Gaffney, even the UN thinks your troofer pinheads pals are frauds and "twisted."
GENEVA, Feb. 4 - The University of Iowa, which receives $255 million a year from taxpayers, and Bank of the West, a major California bank, are being urged to withdraw sponsorship of a controversial speaker who was condemned last week by the United Nations and the Obama Administration for suggesting the 9/11 terrorist attacks were an “inside job” orchestrated by the U.S. government—a conspiracy theory he has promoted in numerous writings and interviews.
Richard Falk, who works for the controversial U.N. Human Rights Council as its investigator on “Israel’s violations of the principles of international law,” is scheduled to be the keynote speaker for a symposium next Thursday, February 10, entitled “Ten Years After 9/11: Rethinking Counterterrorism,” organized by the university’s law and human rights departments.
Sponsors listed on the university website include nine of its academic departments, as well as Bank of the West, one of California’s largest banks and a subsidiary of France’s BNP Paribas.
But international law experts and human rights activists say Falk is the last person who should address a serious university panel on 9/11.
Hillel Neuer, an international lawyer who heads UN Watch, an independent human rights monitoring group in Geneva, Switzerland, sent a letter today to Sally Mason, president of the university, urging that Falk be disinvited. The watchdog group also wrote to J. Michael Shepherd, CEO of Bank of the West. Neuer said another major corporation already pulled its name off the sponsor list, and he hoped the bank would do the same.
“Richard Falk is America’s most high-profile promoter of the 9/11 conspiracy theory, which calls into question whether Al Qaeda terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon,” said Neuer. “It’s wrong to grant an iota of legitimacy to those who deny great atrocities, or to legitimize their twisted political agendas. Hosting Falk right after the U.N. condemned his noxious views is doubly offensive.”
More about the disgusting money grubbing leaches here:http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/WO1102/S00173/911-truther-condemned-by-un-chief-obama-administration.htm
DenverBrit
02-27-2011, 04:14 PM
It's interesting that Falk, Gaffney and other 'Troofers' share another agenda; anti Israeli.
These con-men should be investigated and their true agenda exposed.
http://foragoodcause.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/money_bag_with_dollar_sign.jpg
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
02-28-2011, 09:31 AM
Get informed...
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7E3oIbO0AWE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Indeed. Get informed to reality.
http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docid=-3214024953129565561
DenverBrit
02-28-2011, 10:15 AM
Get informed...
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7E3oIbO0AWE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Bring proof, not more Troofer claims.
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
02-28-2011, 10:38 AM
http://docs.google.com/viewer?pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj1vmYv0-HHkeo8maoOHOQerEynpZAB_9t57MTp1SrkAfA4sjEA9kL0BCcI CeZ5AfRSQxiWxE0CqV0qWBzJXNloo9sunk6A5o6cOwIYWSG55u b1C2vS9tjoygzUA_Pe0VvrYU1p&q=cache%3AaX7S8R2NVWEJ%3Awww.justiceblind.com%2F91 1warningfailures.ppt%20we%20never%20imagined%20air craft%20as%20missiles&docid=5fd0624d88aa6e52ff7e97984391958c&a=bi&pagenumber=11&w=778
More: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:aX7S8R2NVWEJ:www.justiceblind.com/911warningfailures.ppt+we+never+imagined+aircraft+ as+missiles&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESj1vmYv0-HHkeo8maoOHOQerEynpZAB_9t57MTp1SrkAfA4sjEA9kL0BCcI CeZ5AfRSQxiWxE0CqV0qWBzJXNloo9sunk6A5o6cOwIYWSG55u b1C2vS9tjoygzUA_Pe0VvrYU1p&sig=AHIEtbT5MDdE2z83LCamrOubISvWPeCGWA
mhgaffney
02-28-2011, 01:45 PM
If you look at the statement - it's obvious nonsense.
“It’s wrong to grant an iota of legitimacy to those who deny great atrocities, or to legitimize their twisted political agendas.
No one is denying that an atrocity happened. No one is trying to legitimize a twisted agenda.
This is the standard language of disinformation.
The German people are the best informed on the planet. 89% of Germans today are skeptical of the official story -- and know it's a lie.
Soon I will post the next installment of A WALK ON THE DARK SIDE. It will summarize the evidence for insider trading.
Stay tuned --
Thanks, DenverBrit, for proving another sales booth for gaffe.
DenverBrit
02-28-2011, 05:50 PM
Thanks, DenverBrit, for proving another sales booth for gaffe.
Yeah, I'm sure he's making a fortune here.
DenverBrit
02-28-2011, 06:14 PM
If you look at the statement - it's obvious nonsense.
“It’s wrong to grant an iota of legitimacy to those who deny great atrocities, or to legitimize their twisted political agendas.
No one is denying that an atrocity happened. No one is trying to legitimize a twisted agenda.
This is the standard language of disinformation.
The German people are the best informed on the planet. 89% of Germans today are skeptical of the official story -- and know it's a lie.
Soon I will post the next installment of A WALK ON THE DARK SIDE. It will summarize the evidence for insider trading.
Stay tuned --
Let's see who has the credibility here.
Gaffney, well known liar and shameless money grubbing opportunist with a twisted agenda.
Or, Hillel Neuer, an international lawyer who heads UN Watch, an independent human rights monitoring group in Geneva.
No contest!! Neuer has you Troofer clowns pegged.
SoCalBronco
02-28-2011, 06:23 PM
There's only one thing Gaff is really concerned about:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Vm4TG56KGZ4" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
epicSocialism4tw
02-28-2011, 08:15 PM
The fact that Iowa would bring that clown in is proof that that is not an institute of higher education.
mhgaffney
03-01-2011, 02:23 PM
The fact that Iowa would bring that clown in is proof that that is not an institute of higher education.
That clown?
What a bunch of morons.
Richard Falk is a Jewish professor of law at I think Columbia University.
Your insinuations that he is some kind of anti semite are laughable. But this is the present level of stupidity here in the US.
You guys are the real clowns. You don't know shyte from shinola -- which is why you get flim flammed every time.
Some months ago Israel refused to allow Falk into Gaza -- you have to get there via Israel -- even though he is the UN rep on this issue.
I read today that Israel has just revoked a Jerusalem based Anglican bishop's pass port-- kicked him out of the Holy land- -even tho he was borne there and lived in Jerusalem all his life. That's where he has his ministry.
His crime apparently was that he spoke out against Israel's Nazi-like polices -- Many Palestinians are CHristians. He cares about his flock. That's his crime.
Was it even reported on FOX? CNN?
DenverBrit
03-01-2011, 02:38 PM
Falk is a well known Troofer and liar who's association with David Ray Griffin makes him an equally culpable fraud.
Of course you try to make him something else.
Fortunately, those who monitor his committee's activities aren't fooled.
“Richard Falk is America’s most high-profile promoter of the 9/11 conspiracy theory, which calls into question whether Al Qaeda terrorists attacked the World Trade Center and the Pentagon,”
Mr. Falk has used his UN imprimatur to promote the 9/11 conspiracy theory. In Falk’s November 2008 article entitled “9/11: More than meets the eye”, published in The Journal, a Scottish newspaper, he signed in his UN capacity, as “an appointee to two United Nations positions on the Palestinian territories.” Falk’s article implied that the 9/11 attacks were committed by “the established elites of the American governmental structure.” The article praised the work of David Ray Griffin.
mhgaffney
03-01-2011, 06:16 PM
You -- the guy who wants proof --- are simply quoting the opinion of the Zionist. No surprise.
The real issue is whether the Zionist's opinion is correct. You assume this is this case -- without even thinking.
This is why I call you a "knee jerk." All you do is react. You don't think. You don't question.
I'm very pleased to hear that professor Falk is now talking about 9/11. This was not the case before. He clearly has evolved --
More than we can say about you.
DenverBrit
03-01-2011, 08:01 PM
You -- the guy who wants proof --- are simply quoting the opinion of the Zionist. No surprise.
The real issue is whether the Zionist's opinion is correct. You assume this is this case -- without even thinking.
This is why I call you a "knee jerk." All you do is react. You don't think. You don't question.
I'm very pleased to hear that professor Falk is now talking about 9/11. This was not the case before. He clearly has evolved --
More than we can say about you.
As usual, you can't get even simple facts right. Falk has been a 911 Troofer for some time. He was in collusion with that other well known fraud, Griffin.
Try and keep up, Gaffney.
In 2004, Falk wrote the preface to David Ray Griffin's book The New Pearl Harbor: Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11 which maintains that the George W. Bush administration was complicit in the September 11 attacks.
He also signed a statement released by the organization 9/11 Truth in 2004 that calls for a new investigation into the September 11 attacks.
DenverBrit
03-01-2011, 08:13 PM
You -- the guy who wants proof --- are simply quoting the opinion of the Zionist. No surprise.
The real issue is whether the Zionist's opinion is correct. You assume this is this case -- without even thinking.
This is why I call you a "knee jerk." All you do is react. You don't think. You don't question.
I'm very pleased to hear that professor Falk is now talking about 9/11. This was not the case before. He clearly has evolved --
More than we can say about you.
Don't be a jackass. On numerous occasions, during the last few years Falk has been the source of criticism and demands that he resign his UN post for his absurd 911 rhetoric.
orangeatheist
03-01-2011, 08:38 PM
Don't be a jackass.
Oh, comeon, Brit! Fish gotta swim, and all that...
mhgaffney
03-02-2011, 04:46 AM
Don't be a jackass. On numerous occasions, during the last few years Falk has been the source of criticism and demands that he resign his UN post for his absurd 911 rhetoric.
No -- wrong.
I have been following Falk for many months. This is something recent.
And who cares that someone criticized him? You should listen to what Falk is saying.
DenverBrit
03-02-2011, 07:53 AM
No -- wrong.
I have been following Falk for many months. This is something recent.
And who cares that someone criticized him? You should listen to what Falk is saying.
Wrong?? I guess time flies when you skip your meds.
Again, Gaffney, your 'research' and subject knowledge is a joke, just like your 911 bull****.
From July 2008.
Critics Demand Resignation of U.N. Official Who Wants Probe of 9/11 'Inside Job' Theories
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,369122,00.html#ixzz1FSRZkjLD
DenverBrit
03-02-2011, 07:54 AM
Oh, comeon, Brit! Fish gotta swim, and all that...
;D
Kid A
03-02-2011, 08:02 AM
Truthers are in good company with one of Hollywood's sanest minds:
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PviXgj-yS5Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Obushma
03-02-2011, 09:42 AM
Anyone who believes the official 9/11 story is dumb as ****. Tim Osman (aka, Osama Bin Laden) was a CIA agent, his family was flown out of the United States the day after the bombings. Why did Dick Cheney call off the interceptors that could have reached the planes? Coincidence that NORAD was in its largest drill ever when the attacks occurred?
You don't have to believe that the Bush Admin was involved, but to believe the official story....Mommy still tell you Santa's real Brit? At the very least it was a complete negligent breakdown of National Security, and not ONE person was fired over it.
DenverBrit
03-02-2011, 10:20 AM
Anyone who believes the official 9/11 story is dumb as ****. Tim Osman (aka, Osama Bin Laden) was a CIA agent, his family was flown out of the United States the day after the bombings. Why did Dick Cheney call off the interceptors that could have reached the planes? Coincidence that NORAD was in its largest drill ever when the attacks occurred?
You don't have to believe that the Bush Admin was involved, but to believe the official story....Mommy still tell you Santa's real Brit? At the very least it was a complete negligent breakdown of National Security, and not ONE person was fired over it.
Not only more delusional nonsense but "mommy" smack too.
Seriously, grow up.
Obushma
03-02-2011, 10:36 AM
Not only more delusional nonsense but "mommy" smack too.
Seriously, grow up.
Mommy smack? You're a lil bitch Brit, go clean your red rocket.
None of what I wrote was false, anyone can look that information up from multiple sources. Come back when you have the facts slimy.
Anyone who believes the official 9/11 story is dumb as ****.
Anyone who believes the troofer BS is a complete and total idiot.
Tim Osman (aka, Osama Bin Laden) was a CIA agent,
False.
his family was flown out of the United States the day after the bombings.
False. And "bombings"? BS.
Why did Dick Cheney call off the interceptors that could have reached the planes?
False.
Coincidence that NORAD was in its largest drill ever when the attacks occurred?
Not quite true.
I recommend a visit to 911myths.com to get your head out of your butt.
Obushma
03-02-2011, 11:27 AM
Anyone who believes the troofer BS is a complete and total idiot.
False.
TRUE
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/binladen_cia.html
http://www.911myths.com/html/tim_osman_was_bin_ladin_.html
False. And "bombings"? BS.
God you're such a liar, it's easy to destroy you W*GS
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/30/archive/main313048.shtml
False.
Whether the call was made or not, the decision came too late, problems with comunication :rofl:
Not quite true.
Yes it is
http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm
You fail W*GS
DenverBrit
03-02-2011, 11:35 AM
Mommy smack? You're a lil b**** Brit, go clean your red rocket.
None of what I wrote was false, anyone can look that information up from multiple sources. Come back when you have the facts slimy.
LOL You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you.
You fail W*GS
I looked up "Obushma" in the urban dictionary - all it had was this picture:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_f9SDB8-4ZsQ/TFIOXXrifZI/AAAAAAAAAgw/xtYn0EzlYF0/s400/head_up_ass.jpg
Obushma
03-02-2011, 12:04 PM
LOL You're not the sharpest knife in the drawer, are you.
Says the guy that's bought into the offical 9/11 story? :rofl:
Obushma
03-02-2011, 12:08 PM
I looked up "Obushma" in the urban dictionary - all it had was this picture:
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_f9SDB8-4ZsQ/TFIOXXrifZI/AAAAAAAAAgw/xtYn0EzlYF0/s400/head_up_ass.jpg
Is that what you do waiting for your next john in a Minnesota airport bathroom, do the politicians like that kind of ****?
TDmvp
03-02-2011, 01:07 PM
Get informed...
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7E3oIbO0AWE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Hilarious!Hilarious!Hilarious!Hilarious! you actually went there LA ?
Dude I respect you a lot actually but when your goto get informed line for this topic is to point us to a movie made by children it's pretty laughable.
I've watched every version of loose change , and I've watched the guys from Popular Mech. Blow them outa the water. Try it...
Maybe watch this ...Those Children lost all (not that they had any) creditability after this debate v.s. people who are actually highly educated.
Watch how they melt when challenged by someone who actually knows what they are talking about , and how frustrated they get when they realize how bad this is going and how child like they come off and getting all in a huff cause they are just getting owned ...
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/stVmEmJ666M" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/1d0XEHahJ2Q" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/T_Fm3Zc7D8I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lpckijMVe3I" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/fEg6XEP-Cig" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
TDmvp
03-02-2011, 01:21 PM
The two KIDS who put together Loose Change come off like total spoiled know little punks in that video...
Anytime they are pinned they just huff and puff and shout you lie and are basically mentally defenseless to even try to stand up to the Pop Mech guys who are actually highly educated.
They come off like little kids who have been caught not telling the truth about a lamp they broke when their parents ask about it . I have so seen that whole act they are doing being done by little kids , the stammering and huffing and getting all defensive.
Rohirrim
03-02-2011, 02:42 PM
Popular Mechanics pretty much settled the questions for me. That, and the possibility of carrying out such a plot, and the numbers of people who would be required to maintain secrecy, make the whole idea of such a conspiracy absurd in extremis.
DenverBrit
03-02-2011, 03:02 PM
Thanks for posting the vids. Talk about get the kiddies getting owned. ;D
Amy Goodman's interview with David Ray Griffin was a classic, exposing him for the fraud he is.
She asked the right questions, the type of questions that stump all Troofers: Factual questions.
The New Pearl Harbor: A Debate On A New Book That Alleges The Bush Administration Was Behind The 9/11 Attacks
AMY GOODMAN: Can you name an expert you have relied on, for example on the issue of the world trade center towers going down, expert in structural engineering who has said it is impossible for the explanation to be the planes hit, and the fires caused the towers to go down?
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: Well, again, I say I have got 40 pages of notes. I’ve got a lot of notes on that chapter, and so readers can go and see the—
AMY GOODMAN: Name just one. Name just one structural engineering expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers to go down.
DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: I’m sorry, I don’t have that information at my fingertips right at this moment.
http://www.democracynow.org/2004/5/26/the_new_pearl_harbor_a_debate
Even Griffin's own publisher disowned him and his crazy theories.
The Lone Bolt
03-02-2011, 03:10 PM
Obushma,
if you really think that you have a case for an inside jobbity-job, I invite you to take it to the JREF forum: http://forums.randi.org/forumdisplay.php?f=64
I've issues the same challenge to LABF and Gaffney. Gaff has sputtered something about them being "nihilists" and refuses to take them on. LABF similarly dodges. How about you?
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
03-03-2011, 03:11 AM
http://www.bartcop.com/monkey-inside-job.jpg
L.A. BRONCOS FAN
03-03-2011, 03:12 AM
The two KIDS who put together Loose Change....
Any third-grader can see that the official BushCo account is a total sham.
mhgaffney
03-03-2011, 08:19 AM
Popular Mechanics pretty much settled the questions for me. That, and the possibility of carrying out such a plot, and the numbers of people who would be required to maintain secrecy, make the whole idea of such a conspiracy absurd in extremis.
This is because you do not read and do not learn. You keep repeating the same old same old dead arguments. ad nauseum.
The Popular Mechanics article attacking the 911 truthers carefully avoided the real issues.
They were right on a couple of points -- but those points are irrelevant to the big questions.
mhgaffney
03-03-2011, 08:22 AM
I just posted a footnoted analysis of insider trading pre 9/11 -- and showed that it really happened big time.
The source material is given for anyone who is skeptical. Of course, clowns like Ro read a half dozen books a year and think they are well read.
Many others are happy just to read the Sunday comics. Ain't America glorious?
America: graveyard of rainbows.
Popular Mechanics pretty much settled the questions for me. That, and the possibility of carrying out such a plot, and the numbers of people who would be required to maintain secrecy, make the whole idea of such a conspiracy absurd in extremis.
And yet pulling off 9/11 as an inside job is child's play compared to the claims from the anti-science anti-intelligence Right that manmade global warming is a hoax or scam.
Some folks' brains just don't work properly.
This is because you do not read and do not learn. You keep repeating the same old same old dead arguments. ad nauseum.
You're the resident expert on "same old dead arguments", gaffe. Remember red-mercury-powered pure-fusion mini-nukes? How long did you cling to that one, repeating it ad nauseum despite having it rebutted each and every time?
The Popular Mechanics article attacking the 911 truthers carefully avoided the real issues.
The "real issue" being that "banksters" (read "Jews") were behind it.
Go eff yourself.
DenverBrit
03-03-2011, 08:50 AM
This is because you do not read and do not learn. You keep repeating the same old same old dead arguments. ad nauseum.
You have described yourself perfectly.
mhgaffney
03-03-2011, 09:31 AM
Read this.
http://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/2011/03/02/black-911-a-walk-on-the-dark-side-2/
When you are done, sincere apologies will be accepted. I am not the vindictive sort.
MHG
TDmvp
03-03-2011, 12:21 PM
Any third-grader can see that the official BushCo account is a total sham.
From the looks of it any third-grader can make a stupid movie about 9/11 with zero scientific proof and people will quote / use it as a reference.
Talk about total sham.
And who gives a $hit what Bush says about 9/11 , use your own eyes and common sense and common sense tell you you can't hide such a large thing without leaks.
Even smart Libs like Matt Taibbi (a hero to the left) understand how impossible it would be to cover up... So basically if you think 9/11 was a inside job you are wacko.
<iframe title="YouTube video player" width="480" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/r-gMedxCulw" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>