View Full Version : Quantitative Easing Explained
chadta
11-14-2010, 06:10 AM
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/PTUY16CkS-k?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/PTUY16CkS-k?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Arkie
11-16-2010, 09:43 AM
LOL
Why not call it the printing money?
Because the printing money is the last refuge of failed economic empires and banana republics and the Fed doesn’t want to admit this is their only idea.
The value of the $ goes down, but the value of stocks go up because they are being measured in devalued money.
The endgame of quantitative easing, helps the 1% of people who own 38% of all stocks and the 19% who own 53% of all stocks. The other 80% of America own only 10% interest in the stock market. This is the reality: quantitative easing helps one out of five Americans.
Arkie
11-16-2010, 09:50 AM
This video explains QE in terms understandable to financial and non-financial people.
<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/wpmlHTeVG9A?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/wpmlHTeVG9A?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>
Mile High Shack
11-16-2010, 09:54 AM
the funny this is about "the Goldman Sachs".....so true, this company is the head of the mfn' snake, we need to kill it
Smiling Assassin27
11-16-2010, 09:57 AM
The Fed can control the money supply but it cannot control where that money goes or even IF it goes anywhere at all.
Yet another example of putting an 'intellectual' in charge of a real world problem. We did it with the presidency, why not at the Fed as well?
epicSocialism4tw
11-16-2010, 11:55 AM
the funny this is about "the Goldman Sachs".....so true, this company is the head of the mfn' snake, we need to kill it
You have to get them out of the Obama administration first.
Mile High Shack
11-16-2010, 11:56 AM
You have to get them out of the Obama administration first.
for **** sakes, it's not just Obama, did you not see Bernake was nominated UNDER GEORGE ****ING BUSH?????3
for God sakes dude, open your eyes, you are being played, NEITHER side is for the little guy
epicSocialism4tw
11-16-2010, 11:59 AM
for **** sakes, it's not just Obama, did you not see Bernake was nominated UNDER GEORGE ****ING BUSH?????3
for God sakes dude, open your eyes, you are being played, NEITHER side is for the little guy
Did I say anything about sides, moron?
Go back to government janitor work (aka climate change employment) or whatever it is you do that gives you Stockholm syndrome to the point that you advocate for your masters.
Mile High Shack
11-16-2010, 12:53 PM
Did I say anything about sides, moron?
Go back to government janitor work (aka climate change employment) or whatever it is you do that gives you Stockholm syndrome to the point that you advocate for your masters.
both sides are working against the middle class dude
mhgaffney
11-16-2010, 01:18 PM
The Fed can control the money supply but it cannot control where that money goes or even IF it goes anywhere at all.
Yet another example of putting an 'intellectual' in charge of a real world problem. We did it with the presidency, why not at the Fed as well?
Wrong. Yes -- they can. They do.
Smiling Assassin27
11-16-2010, 03:13 PM
Wrong. Yes -- they can. They do.
If that were the case, lenders would be lending. They are not. If that were the case, consumers would be borrowing. They are not. Consumers are the problem, so unless the Fed can give us all a check for $50,000, QE II is barely gonna move the needle.