PDA

View Full Version : Frank Beamer is an idiot...


Taco John
09-06-2010, 09:48 PM
GARCIA! WHAT THE HELL DUDE!

What's up with VA Tech dropping that game to those imposters! And what's up with four deep passes in a row when they've got over a minute and two time outs to use!

AUGH! I'm going to be hearing about it from all my relatives that adore those fake broncos...

baja
09-06-2010, 09:50 PM
The new rules say you can get banned for calling someone an idiot. ;D

BMF Bronco
09-06-2010, 09:51 PM
GARCIA! WHAT THE HELL DUDE!

What's up with VA Tech dropping that game to those imposters! And what's up with four deep passes in a row when they've got over a minute and two time outs to use!

AUGH! I'm going to be hearing about it from all my relatives that adore those fake broncos...

No kidding man, even my live in said the same thing, she says, "why in the hell are they going deep when they have time outs?!" I first about crapped myself for her knowing what she was talking about and second because she was 100% on queue. Beamer lost that game through the playcalling.

Hercules Rockefeller
09-06-2010, 09:59 PM
Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but I thought that late hit call at the end of the game was terrible. It wasn't clear that the WR had gone out of bounds, and he was still trying to go down the sidelines (I'd bet if you got an honest answer from him, he didn't realize he'd stepped out either).

Taco John
09-06-2010, 10:11 PM
Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but I thought that late hit call at the end of the game was terrible. It wasn't clear that the WR had gone out of bounds, and he was still trying to go down the sidelines (I'd bet if you got an honest answer from him, he didn't realize he'd stepped out either).


I thought that was a terrible call too. Once that call was made, I knew that it was over.

Taco John
09-06-2010, 10:11 PM
The rest of the BSU schedule is pretty much nothing but a bunch of powderpuffs. They'll go undefeated again unless Oregon State manages to knock them off in two weeks.

RhymesayersDU
09-06-2010, 10:17 PM
Probably wouldn't have made a difference, but I thought that late hit call at the end of the game was terrible. It wasn't clear that the WR had gone out of bounds, and he was still trying to go down the sidelines (I'd bet if you got an honest answer from him, he didn't realize he'd stepped out either).

Totally agree. I was rooting for Boise State because I'd love to see them in a championship game, but if somebody is tip-toeing the line there's absolutely no real way to know if he's in or out if you're a defender. Complete gift.

epicSocialism4tw
09-06-2010, 10:19 PM
No kidding man, even my live in said the same thing, she says, "why in the hell are they going deep when they have time outs?!" I first about crapped myself for her knowing what she was talking about and second because she was 100% on queue. Beamer lost that game through the playcalling.

Dude, that could definitely be a keeper. Ha!

Vegas_Bronco
09-06-2010, 10:23 PM
No kidding man, even my live in said the same thing, she says, "why in the hell are they going deep when they have time outs?!" I first about crapped myself for her knowing what she was talking about and second because she was 100% on queue. Beamer lost that game through the playcalling.

Maybe we can set up a play date with your kids and mine...you know...get the wives together. Maybe some of your wive's knowledge can rub off on mine...you know FOR THE SAKE OF THE KIDS KIND OF THING.

Doggcow
09-06-2010, 10:25 PM
Lets go Oregon State.

I dont want to see Boise in the NC because they played 2 games all season...

Vegas_Bronco
09-06-2010, 10:27 PM
GARCIA! WHAT THE HELL DUDE!

What's up with IDAHO scheduling that game to those Cornhuskers!

AUGH! I'm going to be hearing about it from all my relatives that adore those fake cornhuskers...

Don't bring your knife to a cornhusker gun fight TJ....your week shouldn't involve talking smack or capping on anyone or I feel it will be delivered double fold after this next weekend.

epicSocialism4tw
09-06-2010, 10:28 PM
Lets go Oregon State.

I dont want to see Boise in the NC because they played 2 games all season...

Hey, if they play 2 games all season, they'll have a leg up on Texas by a game!

BroncoDoug
09-06-2010, 10:37 PM
GARCIA! WHAT THE HELL DUDE!

What's up with VA Tech dropping that game to those imposters! And what's up with four deep passes in a row when they've got over a minute and two time outs to use!

AUGH! I'm going to be hearing about it from all my relatives that adore those fake broncos...

Hey they produced your Adopt a Bronco...

gunns
09-06-2010, 10:40 PM
The rest of the BSU schedule is pretty much nothing but a bunch of powderpuffs. They'll go undefeated again unless Oregon State manages to knock them off in two weeks.

And who does VT play the rest of the way? Or most of the other BCS teams? Their schedules are just as lame. And Boise St. beat the #10 in the nation tonight.

BroncoDoug
09-06-2010, 10:42 PM
I think preseason rankings are a joke, they shouldn't put out the first set of rankings until the third week of the season. That way we can see at least a little bit of who teams are. But they just put them out early so the TV networks can tout a top 10 matchup!

Inkana7
09-06-2010, 10:46 PM
Boise State is legit. It's not their fault no one wants them in their conference or on their schedule.

Kid A
09-06-2010, 10:47 PM
Lets go Oregon State.

I dont want to see Boise in the NC because they played 2 games all season...

No kidding. Ironically, them going to the title game would be an argument for a playoff. SEC, Big XII, Big Ten schools not only play several top 25 schools each year, the "middle of the road" teams they play could win the WAC most years.

I love what they've done at that program in Boise, lots of fun to watch, but I can't begin to justify putting an undefeated Broncos team in over a 1 loss Ohio State, Alabama, Texas, etc.

Broncofan_H
09-06-2010, 10:48 PM
The rest of the BSU schedule is pretty much nothing but a bunch of powderpuffs. They'll go undefeated again unless Oregon State manages to knock them off in two weeks.

Beware the game 9/18 at Wyoming. Possible trap game with Boise looking ahead to Oregon St. Wyoming should be pretty tough this year, and winning in Laramie is never real easy.

Jay3
09-06-2010, 10:51 PM
When Virginia Tech had the lead and the ball, the RB should have stayed in bounds.

epicSocialism4tw
09-06-2010, 10:53 PM
No kidding. Ironically, them going to the title game would be an argument for a playoff. SEC, Big XII, Big Ten schools not only play several top 25 schools each year, the "middle of the road" teams they play could win the WAC most years.

I love what they've done at that program in Boise, lots of fun to watch, but I can't begin to justify putting an undefeated Broncos team in over a 1 loss Ohio State, Alabama, Texas, etc.

Take a look at Texas' schedule.

They play OU and...they play OU.

Same thing every year. USC has traditionally done the same thing.

So at least Boise is trying to line up competitive games. Texas and USC avoid them.

BMF Bronco
09-06-2010, 11:00 PM
Maybe we can set up a play date with your kids and mine...you know...get the wives together. Maybe some of your wive's knowledge can rub off on mine...you know FOR THE SAKE OF THE KIDS KIND OF THING.

NOT my wife, my live in! hehehe!

Inkana7
09-06-2010, 11:03 PM
Take a look at Texas' schedule.

They play OU and...they play OU.

Same thing every year. USC has traditionally done the same thing.

So at least Boise is trying to line up competitive games. Texas and USC avoid them.

Exactly. Look at OSU's schedule. MAC and Big 10 creampuffs. At least they've actually had the stones to play Texas, USC and now Miami recently. Other than that, though, not much. Iowa and Wisconsin are tough but they're still Big 10.

BroncoDoug
09-06-2010, 11:15 PM
I would like to be in the Broncos locker room tomorrow when Eddie Royal and Ryan Clady see each other...

epicSocialism4tw
09-06-2010, 11:25 PM
Exactly. Look at OSU's schedule. MAC and Big 10 creampuffs. At least they've actually had the stones to play Texas, USC and now Miami recently. Other than that, though, not much. Iowa and Wisconsin are tough but they're still Big 10.

Too many of these big conference schools with big names do that. They know that they just have to win their conference to get in. Texas and USC are the worst. Its not like USC plays it a good conference anyway. They should have to line up competition like everyone else.

~Crash~
09-06-2010, 11:29 PM
Lets go Oregon State.

I dont want to see Boise in the NC because they played 2 games all season...

um kiss my ass :sunshine:

sgbfan
09-06-2010, 11:51 PM
Boise State is legit. It's not their fault no one wants them in their conference or on their schedule.

When they ask for too much money to go play someone, then it is kind of their fault.

OBF1
09-06-2010, 11:57 PM
And who does VT play the rest of the way? Or most of the other BCS teams? Their schedules are just as lame. And Boise St. beat the #10 in the nation tonight.

Real BCS teams hail from the SEC and they play each other every year... Not like a weak pac10 or big 12. ROFL!

Dutch
09-07-2010, 12:02 AM
Still a pretty damned compelling game tonight. Glad BS won as they are a rocky mountain school.

Dutch
09-07-2010, 12:04 AM
Real BCS teams hail from the SEC and they play each other every year... Not like a weak pac10 or big 12. ROFL!

Yeah, like that dominant performance put on by LSU against a practice squad team from NC the other night here in Atlanta.

HAT
09-07-2010, 12:14 AM
Take a look at Texas' schedule.

They play OU and...they play OU.

Same thing every year. USC has traditionally done the same thing.

So at least Boise is trying to line up competitive games. Texas and USC avoid them.

GTFOOH......Have all the USC hate you want because of the infractions but don't try to pretend that Pete scheduled OOC softies. During their run they would play anybody, anywhere.

Drunk Monkey
09-07-2010, 12:19 AM
Too many of these big conference schools with big names do that. They know that they just have to win their conference to get in. Texas and USC are the worst. Its not like USC plays it a good conference anyway. They should have to line up competition like everyone else.

So Texas didn't play Ohio St for 2 openers in a row a while back? If you are going to make broad accusations you need to throw Florida in there also.

Inkana7
09-07-2010, 12:27 AM
GTFOOH......Have all the USC hate you want because of the infractions but don't try to pretend that Pete scheduled OOC softies. During their run they would play anybody, anywhere.

Oh yeah, like that Fresno State squad that put up 40 and almost beat them back in 2005?

Taco John
09-07-2010, 12:40 AM
Hey they produced your Adopt a Bronco...

...and don't think that doesn't pain me...

OBF1
09-07-2010, 12:43 AM
Yeah, like that dominant performance put on by LSU against a practice squad team from NC the other night here in Atlanta.

Do not prove you are an idiot by posting on the mane... the past 4 national champions came from the SEC.

Freeking stupid ass poster.

HAT
09-07-2010, 01:00 AM
Oh yeah, like that Fresno State squad that put up 40 and almost beat them back in 2005?

Actually I was talking about the Auburns, Arkansas' & VT's of the world but yeah, now that you mention it.....

I give Pete a **** ton of credit for scheduling Hill's Bulldogs that year. Hill had the same "anyone, anywhere, anytime" attitude during those years & couldn't get most national programs to play him.

shakenbake
09-07-2010, 02:04 AM
Take a look at Texas' schedule.

They play OU and...they play OU.

Same thing every year. USC has traditionally done the same thing.

So at least Boise is trying to line up competitive games. Texas and USC avoid them.

Whatever, it isn't like OU has some daunting schedule ahead of them.

And you do know that Texas just signed home and home agreements with USC,Cal, Norte Dame, and UCLA...

footstepsfrom#27
09-07-2010, 02:40 AM
I love what they've done at that program in Boise, lots of fun to watch, but I can't begin to justify putting an undefeated Broncos team in over a 1 loss Ohio State, Alabama, Texas, etc.
Why not? It's not a real title anyway just a media popularity thing that determines who gets a shot at the brass ring instead of playing for it on the field. Like I told this Packer fan one time, those NFL championships Green Bay "won" in the '20's, etc...they don't really measure up because they didn't play for it on the field but just took the team with the best record. In this case, they don't even do that.

Rock Chalk
09-07-2010, 06:46 AM
Had Boise State played VA Tech the whole game like they played them in the first quarter I would have been a believer.

As it is, I think year in adn year out Beamer Ball is consistently over-rated and they are not a top 10 team. If that's the best BSU could do against an over-rated VA Tech team then they have zero shot at a national title.

Jay3
09-07-2010, 06:52 AM
I think Boise State is good, but it's irksome that they get national championship credibility merely from beating a legitimate team.

Boise State can't help it. But everybody else has to run the gauntlet of a bunch of tests, week in and week out.

We need a playoff.

Broncojef
09-07-2010, 06:59 AM
I think Boise State is good, but it's irksome that they get national championship credibility merely from beating a legitimate team.

Boise State can't help it. But everybody else has to run the gauntlet of a bunch of tests, week in and week out.

We need a playoff.

A play-off is the only way to go. kinda funny the powers to be think that would somehow not be a profitable system. These guys are either horrid marketing guys or don't understand economics, Someday maybe we'll get it until then I cheer for TCU, Boise State and the little guys to disrupt the system.

Garcia Bronco
09-07-2010, 07:06 AM
Geeze guys. It's the first week. Neither team looked very good. The Hokies have too many new faces, and BSU got spotted 17 points and still barely won. You have to be impressed that they both hung in there and played hard.

Broncojef
09-07-2010, 07:23 AM
Geeze guys. It's the first week. Neither team looked very good. The Hokies have too many new faces, and BSU got spotted 17 points and still barely won. You have to be impressed that they both hung in there and played hard.

I think what gets most people is the talk between Musburger and Herbstreit during the broadcast basically saying if the Broncos weren't beat that game go ahead and pencil them in for a National Championship berth. kind of frustrating to watch the first game of the year and realize a Championship nod may have been decided (and I cheer for Boise State).

Drek
09-07-2010, 07:30 AM
A play-off is the only way to go. kinda funny the powers to be think that would somehow not be a profitable system. These guys are either horrid marketing guys or don't understand economics, Someday maybe we'll get it until then I cheer for TCU, Boise State and the little guys to disrupt the system.

They all know it'll make them money. The non-BCS conference schools have been crying for it going on over a decade now.

But when they last talked about it look at who was for and against. The ACC and SEC, two large conferences with championship games, where pro playoff system, knowing that their 1 loss teams could hang with a no loss team out of the PAC 10 and Big 10.

The PAC 10 and Big 10 though, not having that same size and a conf. championship game to bolster the winners into playoff brackets opposed it, and they hustled the Big 12 into believing them.

If I recall wasn't it the Big 10 commissioner who admitted that a playoff system would make them 4 or 5 times more money than the current bowl system?

Its all a power play for those schools though. The Big 10 and PAC 10 commissioners were both smart enough to realize that they had less bargaining power as far as how the money gets divided due to the fewer number of teams they carry and the lack of a conference championship game. This is why they both sniped off the Big 12.

In an ideal world we set up an 8 team playoff system where the four remaining 12+ team BCS conferences (SEC, ACC, PAC, Big 10+2) each get an automatic bid for the winner of their conference championship. The other 4 are at large and can come from any conference.

In order to work out the number of games played you have a conference head to head week instead of just conference championship week, in which the entire conference pairs across the board with its equal in the sub-conference standings. So in the SEC the #1's in each sub-conference play in the conf. championship, while #2 and #2 pair off, #3 and #3, etc.. This adds extra fuel to sub-conference rivalries and lets every team play an even number of regular season games (12).

Then its a simple 8>4>2>1 three tier playoff, cycle the top 8 bowls in a loop for who gets to host what tier, and all the rest of the bowls can still have their silly little exhibitions.

Problem solved. But for that to happen the money would need to be divided in a workable way. Which isn't easy since the BCS conferences will want the lion's share of the cash while the non-BCS teams will be looking for an even distribution so that if the Boise States and TCUs of the world put on a run and win the title they get paid like a big name team would get paid for the same accomplishment.

It'll happen eventually, once enough power is consolidated so that a handful of men can unilaterally declare the structure of both the games played and how the money will be divided. If the Big 10 can get Notre Dame to join within the next couple years we'll be a whole lot closer.

Jay3
09-07-2010, 07:32 AM
It's totally doable. I don't understand any fan who's against a playoff.

If a playoff opponent is some official, then I cut him some slack because I know it's money and politics stopping it.

But when a fan is against playoff? Or a sports commentator? I literally cannot comprehend that. It would be so awesome.

shakenbake
09-07-2010, 07:37 AM
It has always been the Big 10 that has held up the advancement of a playoff system

Garcia Bronco
09-07-2010, 08:03 AM
I don't care if there is a playoff or not. I do think that if your conference doesn't have a championship game it's a problem.

oubronco
09-07-2010, 08:07 AM
I don't care if there is a playoff or not. I do think that if your conference doesn't have a championship game it's a problem.

This is very true

Mediator12
09-07-2010, 08:29 AM
Most People just do not understand the politics and economics of the Bowl system. They are making changes as fast as possible and one day may get a system together that actually allows a playoff like the other division actually does!

As for Boise State, good for them. You have to play your schedule and then get some help in college. They still have to play and win a Championship Bowl game too IF, and that's a big IF, they get there!

hookemhess
09-07-2010, 08:56 AM
I would like to be in the Broncos locker room tomorrow when Eddie Royal and Ryan Clady see each other...

@eddieroyal19 Kellen Moore...Boise State...RESPECT...Clady I don't wanna hear it lol

http://twitter.com/eddieroyal19/status/23204109835

oubronco
09-07-2010, 09:59 AM
I would like to see Kellen Moore in a Denver Bronco's uniform that kid threw some nice passes right where they needed to be, i'm impressed

Garcia Bronco
09-07-2010, 10:25 AM
I would like to see Kellen Moore in a Denver Bronco's uniform that kid threw some nice passes right where they needed to be, i'm impressed

I wouldn't take either one Taylor or Moore.

ohiobronco2
09-07-2010, 11:02 AM
I don't care if there is a playoff or not. I do think that if your conference doesn't have a championship game it's a problem.

And there will be one next year. Finally. Why couldn't V Tech pull out the W, now we are going to have to hear about this crap all year long unless Oregon St. beats them.

~Crash~
09-07-2010, 11:30 AM
Had Boise State played VA Tech the whole game like they played them in the first quarter I would have been a believer.

As it is, I think year in adn year out Beamer Ball is consistently over-rated and they are not a top 10 team. If that's the best BSU could do against an over-rated VA Tech team then they have zero shot at a national title.

take a look at how 90% of the teams played ...nice try though .Ha!

~Crash~
09-07-2010, 11:32 AM
I wouldn't take either one Taylor or Moore.

I would take Moore as a Coach at this point ! time will tell as a player, he is damn young yet to say as a player .