PDA

View Full Version : We can't manage crisis.


baja
06-22-2010, 08:17 AM
"Mismanaging Contraction"

By James Howard Kunstler for Cluster**** Nation

Lesson of the Macondo: Blowout preventers don't prevent blowouts. This comes as a shock to people attuned to the on-schedule arrival of techno-miracles. Now, all the acronym-studded invocations of techno-mastery by men wearing interesting hats will not avail to put the schnitz on an epic horror show in the Gulf of Mexico.

President Obama's speech to the nation a week ago was designed as a kind of blowout preventer for the legitimacy of the federal government. It did little to stop the hemorrhaging of confidence in political leadership. A nation foundering in a crippled vessel in the horse latitudes of collective purpose on a sea of red ink looks to its captain - who puffs a few platitudes into the tattered sails and retreats belowdecks to pace and stew. This is a society truly lost at sea, where even the friendly dolphins are turning belly-up and the dying seabirds stare accusingly under their cloaks of crude oil. The feeling grows that we can't do anything right. Will someone please turn off the TV?

In 2008, the voters turned to a lanky newcomer from Illinois to rescue itself from just the sort of technocrat jerkoffs who had run the nation into a ditch with their invocations of "mission accomplished" and "Good job, Brownie." Change was in the air. Alas, consistent with the apparent fact that history rhymes but doesn't repeat, Barack Obama proved to be the reincarnation of Millard Fillmore, not Abe Lincoln. Sometimes history works in free verse and this stanza was off by a few syllables. It turns out that change was exactly the one thing not really in the air. America does not want change, except from the cash register at WalMart.

The last time America faced a convulsion as profound as the present one was the late 1850s. The internal contradiction of slavery was driving the nation crazy. The Whig party had been running things for a couple of decades. The Whigs were the party of Daniel Webster and Henry Clay. They tried everything possible to finesse the expansion of US territory around the inflammatory issue of slavery. Fillmore came along just in time for the Compromise of 1850, which was intended to settle things and did absolutely nothing to settle things. By the time the election of 1852 happened, Both Webster and Clay were old men preparing to meet their maker and the Whig party absolutely fell apart. Scroll forward a few years and we're in the slaughterhouse of The Civil War.

A hundred and sixty years later now, and the USA faces a new and very different set of internal contradictions. We've ramped up a living arrangement that has no future, just as slavery had no future. We're uncomfortable with the mandates of reality, which is trying to tell us we have to live differently. The American people don't want to hear this. The president doesn't want to tell them. It's possible that he is not tuned into the reality radio station that is broadcasting its mandates. You'd think the Macondo Blowout horror show was coming across loud and clear.

Right after President Obama gave his vapid speech last week, he traveled to Ohio to brag about how much federal stimulus money was going into "shovel-ready" highway projects there. I sincerely believe that the last thing we need right now in this country is more and better highways. Every president since Jimmy Carter has acknowledged that there's a problem with our extreme oil dependency, but none of them have made the short leap to understand that we have a more fundamental problem with car dependency. Someone paying attention to the mandates of reality would get the choo-choo trains running from Dayton to Columbus to Cincinnati to Cleveland - and he would tell General Motors to get into the business of making railroad cars so we don't have to import them from Canada.

Reality is telling us to downscale and get different fast. Quit doing everything possible to prop up the drive-in false utopia and all its accessories. Get local. Tighten up. We have no intention of doing that. The idiocy that passes as informed opinion wants the US money managers to kick out the jambs handing out more money created out of thin air to promote a fantasy called "recovery." To what purpose? To keep the tailgate parties going down at the Nascar ovals? Over at The New York Times Monday morning, the fatuous Paul Krugman says that "stinting on spending now threatens the economic recovery." Earth to Krugman: we're mismanaging contraction. Further expansion is just not in the cards right now for the human race. We don't need more people on the planet and we don't have the means to accommodate them. There will be no 'recovery" to "growth" - especially by means of pumping more oil into the system. There is no techno-miracle alt-fuel panoply waiting in the wings to take over from oil. And there is no research-and-development program that will make it happen, no matter how many acronym-studded incantations we drone out.

I admit that contraction is a hard reality - but so is the recognition that we don't get to live forever, something every child begins to grapple with around age seven. The inability to face comprehensive contraction will only insure that its side effects are more debilitating.

Spider
06-22-2010, 08:19 AM
Calling the gulf oil spill a crisis is like calling the Titanic sinking a little mishap .......... this is is a flat out disaster

baja
06-22-2010, 08:23 AM
Yes it is Spider and even more so because our government is completely inept to deal with it.

baja
06-22-2010, 08:28 AM
The feds should have been on this day one but instead they let BP (Big Putz) run the show even after it became clear all they were really interested in was covering their ass and getting out of this as cheaply as possible.

As we speak I bet BP is busy transferring their assets to other corporations so they can declare bankruptcy for the shell of a company called BP

Spider
06-22-2010, 08:42 AM
Yes it is Spider and even more so because our government is completely inept to deal with it.

no one , I mean no one is equipped to handle this .............. every swinging dick on the planet is inept on this ..........

baja
06-22-2010, 09:03 AM
no one , I mean no one is equipped to handle this .............. every swinging dick on the planet is inept on this ..........

Part of handling this is in prevention. We are not understanding the depth of corruption involved here. This should never never have happened.

This is yet another "gift" given the world by Cheney/Bush.

There were steps that could have been taken after the spill occurred. For example letting the oil rise to the surface instead of using dispersants to mask the damage. I think the damage from the dispersed oil will be far far more damaging than the crude on the surface would have been. This cluster fuch has been driven by the 'cover my ass' policy of BP from day one.

Smiling Assassin27
06-22-2010, 09:31 AM
Part of handling this is in prevention. We are not understanding the depth of corruption involved here. This should never never have happened.

This is yet another "gift" given the world by Cheney/Bush.

There were steps that could have been taken after the spill occurred. For example letting the oil rise to the surface instead of using dispersants to mask the damage. I think the damage from the dispersed oil will be far far more damaging than the crude on the surface would have been. This cluster fuch has been driven by the 'cover my ass' policy of BP from day one.

The dispersants had to be approved by the EPA. Louisiana and other states were begging EPA to prohibit the use of dispersants under the surface of the water for fear that it'd poison the food supply in the Gulf. The EPA ignored them and allowed BP to use them. One week later, the EPA changed its mind. Now here's the question. Obama says that the government has been in control of this operation from day one, and that BP can't so much as take a pi$$ without government approval. Given the monumental damage that has been done in the Gulf, are we to believe that a) the government was lax and/or negligent in its delayed response or b) the government is incompetent, irresponsible, and unfit to serve its citizens, given all the damage that has occurred while they were 'in control from day one'?

Either response puts government in a no-win situation as unable/unwilling to respond to the dire needs of its citizens or as bunglers, inept and doing more harm than good.

Rohirrim
06-22-2010, 09:43 AM
I don't know if I agree with everything Kunstler says, but I sure like the way he says it. ;D

I think we are locked in a Gordian knot. The military/industrial complex is hopelessly intertwined with the oil industry. Together, along with multi-national corporations like Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Wall Street, they control the political landscape, not to mention the politicians themselves. Our electoral process has become an elaborate joke and our media a national disgrace.

Time to head on back to the farm and keep your heads down, folks. :welcome:

There ain't no fix until after the fracture.

baja
06-22-2010, 10:01 AM
I don't know if I agree with everything Kunstler says, but I sure like the way he says it. ;D

I think we are locked in a Gordian knot. The military/industrial complex is hopelessly intertwined with the oil industry. Together, along with multi-national corporations like Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Wall Street, they control the political landscape, not to mention the politicians themselves. Our electoral process has become an elaborate joke and our media a national disgrace.

<b>Time to head on back to the farm and keep your heads down, folks. :welcome:</b>

There ain't no fix until after the fracture.

Not so long ago I was called a traitor my many for suggesting this, even you got in a few digs. Glad to see you are waking up and smelling the pork.


Ro - There ain't no fix until after the fracture

This is really the crux of the issue.

We can't fix what's wrong we can only stay close to nature and self sufficiency so as to be healthy to best serve in the rebirth of how we live on the planet.

There is much hope to this end but no hope for a recovery of the old ways we have grown up with.

What to people think unsustainable means anyway.

Rohirrim
06-22-2010, 10:47 AM
Not so long ago I was called a traitor my many for suggesting this, even you got in a few digs. Glad to see you are waking up and smelling the pork.


Ro - There ain't no fix until after the fracture

This is really the crux of the issue.

We can't fix what's wrong we can only stay close to nature and self sufficiency so as to be healthy to best serve in the rebirth of how we live on the planet.

There is much hope to this end but no hope for a recovery of the old ways we have grown up with.

What to people think unsustainable means anyway.

A few digs? Moi? Never happened. ;D

That One Guy
06-22-2010, 11:04 AM
I don't know if I agree with everything Kunstler says, but I sure like the way he says it. ;D

I think we are locked in a Gordian knot. The military/industrial complex is hopelessly intertwined with the oil industry. Together, along with multi-national corporations like Big Pharma, Big Insurance and Wall Street, they control the political landscape, not to mention the politicians themselves. Our electoral process has become an elaborate joke and our media a national disgrace.

Time to head on back to the farm and keep your heads down, folks. :welcome:

There ain't no fix until after the fracture.

I too am quite surprised. Not sure if I've seen such a position by you in the past. Maybe the sentiment has always been there and I just missed it. Interesting.

baja
06-22-2010, 11:12 AM
A few digs? Moi? Never happened. ;D

Err... OK

Better late than never I always say. ;D

Requiem
06-22-2010, 11:26 AM
We are absolutely ****ed regarding this. I guess I am thankful to be in ****stick, South Dakota far away from it where I can at least "think" that this won't impact me. . .

Rohirrim
06-22-2010, 11:32 AM
I don't get you, Baja. If it was up to me, one of the last places I would look to as a refuge would be Mexico. From the sounds of it, they're going to blow up before anybody else in this hemisphere.

That One Guy
06-22-2010, 11:39 AM
I don't get you, Baja. If it was up to me, one of the last places I would look to as a refuge would be Mexico. From the sounds of it, they're going to blow up before anybody else in this hemisphere.

Mexico is way too big to use such a broad statement.

Rohirrim
06-22-2010, 11:45 AM
Mexico is way too big to use such a broad statement.

Read the history of Mexico. Their hallmark is not stability.

That One Guy
06-22-2010, 11:48 AM
Read the history of Mexico. Their hallmark is not stability.

Ahh, I thought your reference was to current problems involving the drug wars.

Isn't Mexico less centralized so country-wide policies have less impacts?

Spider
06-22-2010, 12:04 PM
Part of handling this is in prevention. We are not understanding the depth of corruption involved here. This should never never have happened.

This is yet another "gift" given the world by Cheney/Bush.

There were steps that could have been taken after the spill occurred. For example letting the oil rise to the surface instead of using dispersants to mask the damage. I think the damage from the dispersed oil will be far far more damaging than the crude on the surface would have been. This cluster fuch has been driven by the 'cover my ass' policy of BP from day one.

doesnt matter the corruption , it does , but all the corruption or regulation will change the fact that the BOP failed .............bottom line ........ if this wasnt such a gusher , they could have capped it ...... the problem isnt depth , or corruption , problem is BP tapped into something that no one was prepared to handle ...........

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-24-2010, 06:48 AM
http://www.bartcop.com/bp-dexter.jpg

mhgaffney
06-24-2010, 09:52 AM
It's mind boggling that no one picks up on the obvious.

A real leader would announce a new mandate for the national labs -- Lawrence Livermore, Los Alamos, Sandia -- where the US brain trust supposedly resides --

Obama: "SOLVE THE ENERGY CRISIS! I announce a New Manhattan Project!

Stop making bombs - start to understand how the solar system really works --

Among the questions to be anwered:

1. where does lightning come from? This vast supply of electricity could power the planet if we could learn to tap it.

2. How do we download it -- for human use?

This is what Nikolai Tesla was trying to do, folks. He was 500 years ahead of his time -- and he almost succeeded.

So, why not pick up his research where he left off -- and finish the job? Electricity would become too cheap to meter. With dirt cheap clean electricity we could make the hydrogen economy work -- and also make all the liquid fuel we need. Heck -- we could lift the planet out of poverty in a few years.

So where's the leadership?

baja
06-24-2010, 10:14 AM
I am thinking BP has drilled into the juggler of mother earth and her bleeding will be hard to stop.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
06-24-2010, 07:58 PM
Funny how Caribou Barbie and the rest of the "drill baby, drill" wingnuts have gone low-profile all of a sudden.