PDA

View Full Version : Denver will go 11-5


watermock
03-30-2010, 05:59 AM
poll

bronco_boi_5280
03-30-2010, 06:23 AM
Kind of restrictive poll question, but I had to go 8-8 just because we're still a work in progress.

Kaylore
03-30-2010, 06:25 AM
I think 10-6, but not worse. Gotta see the draft and camp before I decide.

broncogary
03-30-2010, 06:40 AM
11-5. Second year coaches typically improve their team markedly in their second season.

watermock
03-30-2010, 06:43 AM
We have the easiest schedule. Good God.

Look at who we play!

cmhargrove
03-30-2010, 06:56 AM
10-6, Wildcard spot in playoffs.

Dedhed
03-30-2010, 07:17 AM
I think 10-6, but not worse. Gotta see the draft and camp before I decide.

That was my thinking too. I think 10-6 with a wild card berth is par for this team.

oubronco
03-30-2010, 07:24 AM
If we go 8-8 with this cakewalk, WTF?

Arizona is done, Seattle, the Rams, Oakland and KC 2x, Seattle,

that scenario didn't workout to well for us last year

Archer81
03-30-2010, 07:41 AM
Schedule "strength" in March is always a joke. You always have at least 3 teams play wickedly better than their previous year's record said they would. Did we learn nothing from last year? I said 11-5 or better though. So...I guess I didnt.

:Broncos:

Rabb
03-30-2010, 07:41 AM
that scenario didn't workout to well for us last year

not to mention, as much as we all are going to not like it...KC isn't going to be nearly as bad this year

they have had a pretty damn good offseason so far

Broncomutt
03-30-2010, 07:48 AM
Mock if we go 11-5, where does the mandatory late season collapse fit into all that? 10-1 followed by a 1-4 December?

montrose
03-30-2010, 08:11 AM
Time and time again it's shown that strength of schedule has little to do with the success or failure of a team. There are always teams better than projected and worse than projected while teams lose games they should win and win games they should lose. If the Broncos can improve their interior OL and improve in the 2nd of year of their system - winning a lot of games is not out of the question - but it doesn't have anything to do with the teams they play.

TailgateNut
03-30-2010, 08:47 AM
Here we go again with these assinine predictions before training camps are completed and the final rosters carved in stone.

I predict it will snow this year.

Dagmar
03-30-2010, 09:34 AM
If we go 8-8 with this cakewalk, WTF?

Arizona is done, Seattle, the Rams, Oakland and KC 2x, Seattle,

We play Seattle twice?

Br0nc0Buster
03-30-2010, 09:39 AM
If we go 8-8 with this cakewalk, WTF?

Arizona is done, Seattle, the Rams, Oakland and KC 2x, Seattle,

"idiot"
buy a noun

Doggcow
03-30-2010, 09:40 AM
We play Seattle twice?

Those were the good ole days.

Durango
03-30-2010, 10:27 AM
Schedule "strength" in March is always a joke. You always have at least 3 teams play wickedly better than their previous year's record said they would. Did we learn nothing from last year? I said 11-5 or better though. So...I guess I didnt.

:Broncos:

Boy, aint that the truth. You just don't know who is going to rise up, but then, there will be an equal number of teams that look tough, but who will suffer through a miserable season.

Pick Six
03-30-2010, 10:32 AM
Marshall's status on the team is still up in the air, and we don't know who we're going to draft. I can't even begin to fathom a guess, at this point...

NFLBRONCO
03-30-2010, 10:35 AM
If we go 8-8 with this cakewalk, WTF?

Arizona is done, Seattle, the Rams, Oakland and KC 2x, Seattle,

Mock Seattle is no longer in the afc west no need to list them twice.

Rugby7
03-30-2010, 11:20 AM
So If you think they will be below 500, do you select 10-6 or worse?

NFLBRONCO
03-30-2010, 11:31 AM
8-8 is my standard guess. We have tons of question marks and age issues in key positions can they stay on the field alot or not is the question. Our O lacks alot how we upgrade it will be huge key for success in 2010.

strafen
03-30-2010, 11:38 AM
Good post Mock!

broncocalijohn
03-30-2010, 11:47 AM
We play Seattle twice?

"idiot"
buy a noun


You guys really think mock could make a poll and not have at least one mistake?

No way I fall for this poll before a draft. What a mocky selection by if I select 10-6 or worse, doesnt 8-8 fall into that scenario? What about the doomsday "fans" that will have us worse than .500? I smell a rat in Mock's poll where if the team doesnt go at least 8-8, he will have everyone saying that 100% expected better. BTW, we better go at least 8-8 even without Hillis.