PDA

View Full Version : Trade for Mr. Anquan Boldin


Requiem
03-05-2010, 12:53 PM
If they are only asking a third and we unload Marshall, why the **** not?

Beantown Bronco
03-05-2010, 12:55 PM
The only reason would be $.

elsid13
03-05-2010, 12:56 PM
The only reason would be $.

Or the fact that he has been had major injuries for last 3 season and has One left on his current deal.

Smiling Assassin27
03-05-2010, 12:57 PM
If they are only asking a third and we unload Marshall, why the **** not?

I could see that working out well for us. A happy Boldin is a beast.

Dagmar
03-05-2010, 12:57 PM
If they are only asking a third and we unload Marshall, why the **** not?

http://yesreading.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/i-would-venture-to-say-hell-yes.jpg

gtown
03-05-2010, 12:57 PM
We might have to do this. What is McD's offensive without one elite WR? We need Eddie in the slot, a possession receiver like Marshall or Boldin, and a credible deep threat.

Broncosfreak_56
03-05-2010, 12:59 PM
That would be the ideal scenario if the seahawks get marsh and we get the number 6. Throw the cards a third rounder the minute the offer sheet goes through.

Killericon
03-05-2010, 01:00 PM
Seattle gives up #6 for Marshall, and we give up a 3rd for Boldin?

*Spooge*

Requiem
03-05-2010, 01:01 PM
Outside having to pay him and the nagging injuries, he is worth it. We need a legit receiver in this offense and although I like Gaffney and have hopes for Royal, another legitimate threat would be nice. Giving up a third would be fine with me.

gyldenlove
03-05-2010, 01:07 PM
I could see that working out well for us. A happy Boldin is a beast.

A happy Boldin is going to cost 45 million over the nest 5 years.

gyldenlove
03-05-2010, 01:08 PM
Outside having to pay him and the nagging injuries, he is worth it. We need a legit receiver in this offense and although I like Gaffney and have hopes for Royal, another legitimate threat would be nice. Giving up a third would be fine with me.

We should bring Elway back then, aside from his age and artifical shoulders it would be worth it.

cutthemdown
03-05-2010, 01:08 PM
You would think Ravens, Bears, Seahaks would be so into Boldin for a 3rd that the price would go up.

Triplelefthook
03-05-2010, 01:10 PM
We might have to do this. What is McD's offensive without one elite WR? We need Eddie in the slot, a possession receiver like Marshall or Boldin, and a credible deep threat.

trade for Boldin and sign Antonio Bryant

underrated29
03-05-2010, 01:11 PM
lets go get him.

TheDave
03-05-2010, 01:21 PM
If the BMarsh to seattle rumors are true... Then hell yes go get him.

Requiem
03-05-2010, 01:25 PM
Hell Ya DavE!

TDmvp
03-05-2010, 01:52 PM
He's old busted and wants paid .... How is that for why not ?

Requiem
03-05-2010, 01:53 PM
He is 29 count higher

Dagmar
03-05-2010, 01:56 PM
Arizona is closing in on a long-anticpated deal to trade Pro Bowl wide receiver Anquan Boldin. Leading contender: Baltimore. KC also in.

http://twitter.com/Adam_Schefter

CEH
03-05-2010, 01:56 PM
Balt maybe KC
Deal is close

per Shefty

Triplelefthook
03-05-2010, 01:56 PM
boldin is gonna go to baltimore. weak

oubronco
03-05-2010, 02:00 PM
A happy Boldin is going to cost 45 million over the nest 5 years.

and we wouldn't pay that for Marshall who is way better

bronco militia
03-05-2010, 02:09 PM
Posted by Michael David Smith on March 5, 2010 3:59 PM ET
The Arizona Cardinals have multiple trade offers for wide receiver Anquan Boldin and are close to determining which one they'll accept.

PFT has heard that the Baltimore Ravens, Kansas City Chiefs and New England Patriots are all interested in acquiring Boldin from the Cardinals.

Adam Schefter of ESPN reports that the Cardinals have spent much of Friday weighing their offers and determining which one to take. Schefter says that right now, the Ravens are the leading contenders.

Although it was reported this week that the Cardinals wanted a third-round draft pick for Boldin, it's possible that the presence of multiple bidders for his services has upped the price.

The 29-year-old Boldin had 84 catches for 1,024 yards and four touchdowns in 2009.

Beantown Bronco
03-05-2010, 02:15 PM
and we wouldn't pay that for Marshall who is way better

Waaaay better? He might not even be slightly better. Definitely not way better.

oubronco
03-05-2010, 02:24 PM
Waaaay better? He might not even be slightly better. Definitely not way better.

you are dilusional

Beantown Bronco
03-05-2010, 02:28 PM
you are dilusional

Delusional? Boldin's per games played averages in receptions, yds and TDs are all better than Marshall's.

garandman
03-05-2010, 02:41 PM
Think about it, it makes me excited....

Boldin and 6th (Clausen or ?) 11th (Williams or ?)

Would help put us in the right direction!

gyldenlove
03-05-2010, 02:45 PM
Delusional? Boldin's per games played averages in receptions, yds and TDs are all better than Marshall's.

Unfortunately Boldin's games played is not as good.

oubronco
03-05-2010, 03:42 PM
Delusional? Boldin's per games played averages in receptions, yds and TDs are all better than Marshall's.

Ugh this shyt just keep getting better

Atwater His Ass
03-05-2010, 03:44 PM
If they spent big money on Boldin, I'd be upset since I feel the much better investment would be to spend that money on Marshall, who is the younger, healthier, better player.

oubronco
03-05-2010, 03:56 PM
If they spent big money on Boldin, I'd be upset since I feel the much better investment would be to spend that money on Marshall, who is the younger, healthier, better player.

exactly

mattob14
03-05-2010, 04:03 PM
If they spent big money on Boldin, I'd be upset since I feel the much better investment would be to spend that money on Marshall, who is the younger, healthier, better player.

But you've got to compare apples to apples. With the deals being discussed right now, it's Marshall and a 3rd or Boldin and #6 overall. That's a HUGE difference in pick value and swings the deal in favor of Boldin.

GoBroncos84
03-05-2010, 04:12 PM
Best case scenario- Broncos match offer, keep Marshall (no poison pill)

Next best- Marshall to Seattle, Broncos land #6, trade 3rd for Boldin

Worst case- Marshall to Seattle, Broncos land #6, Boldin traded elsewhere



I think the worst case is the most likely at this point, sadly. Boldin would be a good replacement for Marshall, but I think we end up with neither. If we can deal #6, then we possibly get good value. If we stay at 6, we better hit with Eric Berry or one of the top 2 QBs. Still, i'd rather pay marshall and keep the sure thing

GoBroncos84
03-05-2010, 04:14 PM
Done deal: Arizona trades WR Anquan Boldin and a 2010 fifth-round pick to Baltimore for Ravens 2010 third- and fourth-round picks.


per Adam Schefter