PDA

View Full Version : Goldman Sachs is so humble!


TailgateNut
01-22-2010, 07:34 AM
:spit:http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9621900


Not bad (avg bonus at 1/2 million) for ****ing the american taxpayers.

Meck77
01-22-2010, 07:40 AM
Obama has ramped up his rhetoric on financial institutions in recent days, telling CBS’s “60 Minutes” in an interview aired Sunday night: “I did not run for office to be helping out a bunch of fat-cat bankers. ... What’s really frustrating me right now is that you’ve got these same banks who benefited from taxpayer assistance who are fighting tooth and nail ... against financial regulatory control.”



Let me just spare you the time Nut. Bush is a criminal and wasted tax payer money on iraq.

Obama is cut from the exact same cloth and is pandering to the same people that bush did.

ak1971
01-22-2010, 07:52 AM
The govt gave them the money, and they paid it back. They made a bunch of money with it and gave thier employee's money who made the money. I would bet that Goldman is going to give back its bank charter next and tell Obama to **** himself.

Rohirrim
01-22-2010, 07:57 AM
With the new election finance laws, I'm guessing this is the last Democrat to occupy the WH. Adios, Chingachgook.

Come on down, Sarah! Ha!

ak1971
01-22-2010, 08:08 AM
I do love this headline though... Is It Just Us, Or Did Tim Geithner Get Fired Yesterday?

http://finance.yahoo.com/tech-ticker/article/409143/Is-It-Just-Us%2C-Or-Did-Tim-Geithner-Get-Fired-Yesterday%3F

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
01-22-2010, 10:17 AM
Remember: according to the rightards on this board, entities like Goldman Sachs should just be able to police themselves without any oversight or "interference" by the government.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
01-22-2010, 10:20 AM
with the new election finance laws, i'm guessing this is the last democrat to occupy the wh. Adios, chingachgook.

Come on down, sarah! Ha!

privately, top republicans tell politico that they are most concerned right now about their bank balance. They are doing well in recruiting candidates but worry they might not have the cash to sufficiently fund them.

Consider the house. The democratic congressional campaign committee has $15 million in the bank right now — nearly four times more than the national republican congressional committee.

Officials say that, while small and large donors are still chipping in, the recession has caused a dip in contributions from middle-level donors — often the small-business types who are feeling the economic pinch. (gee, i thought these people were supposed to be doing so much better thanks to republican policies? )

at the candidate level, if you tally up all the money for everyone running, democrats have about $60 million more ($175 million to $114 million), according to numbers compiled by the nonpartisan center for responsive politics.

Money is one of the many reasons top gop officials wish the party had not elected michael steele as republican national committee chairman. Senior republicans don’t like his loose lips or his wildly improvisational style. But they could live with that if the rnc were a cash cow. It is not, in part because of steele’s unwillingness to personally stroke top donors.

The rnc has outraised the democratic national committee, but it has less money to spend right now: $9 million vs. The dnc’s $13 million. More troubling to gop insiders on capitol hill is that some major donors say they don’t want to give money to steele’s rnc.

>>

democrats continue to get way more money than republicans from groups outside the official party structure. The new supreme court ruling opens the door for corporations to rush back into politics, but it’s too early to tell how aggressively they will underwrite the gop, given the inherent risk involved in taking on the majority party.

Barring a huge infusion of corporate cash, the democrats have a decisive advantage. Not insurmountable, but by no means insignificant.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/201...politico/31837

8')

Rigs11
01-22-2010, 11:08 AM
its funny to see the right sticking up for the banks. These same jagoffs were so quick to place judgement on the people being foreclosed on.then you have oxycotin boy saying that obama is going after the banks because they are jewish.what a bunch of clowns.

ak1971
01-22-2010, 01:32 PM
its funny to see the right sticking up for the banks. These same jagoffs were so quick to place judgement on the people being foreclosed on.then you have oxycotin boy saying that obama is going after the banks because they are jewish.what a bunch of clowns.

Im glad that you guys follow Rush so closely..I would have no idea what the hell he was saying otherwise.

Hizaki
01-22-2010, 01:57 PM
Remember: according to the rightards on this board, entities like Goldman Sachs should just be able to police themselves without any oversight or "interference" by the government.

Goldman Sachs is in bed with the government, thus receiving a large portion of the bailout package. If you click on the Gerald Celente video I posted today he goes into more detail. Many government appointees are former GS employees by the way (Paulson, Geithner, Rubin among many others). Sadly, crooks like these are in charge of our economy and monetary decisions.

Bronx33
01-22-2010, 02:04 PM
Im glad that you guys follow Rush so closely..I would have no idea what the hell he was saying otherwise.


:rofl:

Rigs11
01-22-2010, 02:14 PM
Im glad that you guys follow Rush so closely..I would have no idea what the hell he was saying otherwise.

you should probably start paying attention then.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/j3npnecnwug02gjipbp8_g.gif

ak1971
01-22-2010, 02:18 PM
you should probably start paying attention then.

http://sas-origin.onstreammedia.com/origin/gallupinc/GallupSpaces/Production/Cms/POLL/j3npnecnwug02gjipbp8_g.gif

whatever you say (or your 9 month old poll) , he doesnt speak for this Republican, and I honestly havent listened to him in years. He is on the same level as the fat ass on the other side of the aisle Mike Moore

Rigs11
01-22-2010, 02:27 PM
whatever you say (or your 9 month old poll) , he doesnt speak for this Republican, and I honestly havent listened to him in years. He is on the same level as the fat ass on the other side of the aisle Mike Moore

funny around here he never does speak for any reoub. convenient.

ak1971
01-22-2010, 02:35 PM
funny around here he never does speak for any reoub. convenient.

Rigs..I'm not saying a lot of Republicans don't listen to him nor that he doens't speak for them. I just cant stand the douche.

Garcia Bronco
01-22-2010, 02:40 PM
Im glad that you guys follow Rush so closely..I would have no idea what the hell he was saying otherwise.

I know right. It's ROTFLMAO funny

kappys
01-22-2010, 03:41 PM
:spit:http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory?id=9621900


Not bad (avg bonus at 1/2 million) for ****ing the american taxpayers.

Well I'm sure the usual average bonus is much higher. So these poor folks are having to slum it with the rest of us.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
01-22-2010, 03:46 PM
whatever you say (or your 9 month old poll)...

Ha ha ha! :laugh:

So what if this particular poll is 9 months old?