Where is the good Broncos Board PM me [Archive] - The Orange Mane

rugbythug

12-20-2009, 07:03 PM

Mile high report is ok, they have lots of HS coaches who are positive.

Hell I bet they find a way to spin our new HC's plan to integrate our LT into the passing game!

So long!

Do they have a board too? I read there site frequently. Especially on my phone is very phone friendly. But I have not seen their board I guess.

As to the Pass to Clady not sure why you would be so down on it it was one play. Coaches through those things in as bones for players ala champ on Offense and the like. Nothing wrong with it. Not like they made it the Game plan.

ant1999e

12-20-2009, 07:03 PM

I must unfortunately agree. This place is going down hill thanks to the likes of Dragqueens and pot smoking hippies.

Florida_Bronco

12-20-2009, 07:08 PM

I must unfortunately agree. This place is going down hill thanks to the likes of Dragqueens and pot smoking hippies.

The problem is nobody (read: mods and admins) doing anything about it.

broncosteven

12-20-2009, 07:09 PM

Do they have a board too? I read there site frequently. Especially on my phone is very phone friendly. But I have not seen their board I guess.

As to the Pass to Clady not sure why you would be so down on it it was one play. Coaches through those things in as bones for players ala champ on Offense and the like. Nothing wrong with it. Not like they made it the Game plan.

They are having trouble in the red zone, they decide to fix them by an illegal pass to their LT who almost gets killed when upended on the tackle?

1st off when the team lined up someone should have seen Marshall covering Clady and called a time out. No one paid attention and it cost them five yards for Illegal touching. If it was something they wanted to break out in a blowout fine but it didn't help with red zone struggles the rest of the day.

It was the biggest joke of a play I have ever seen executed. Everyone knows the Oline is ineligible and it was not like Clady had room to rumble into the endzone. Just an embarrasing joke of a play.

ant1999e

12-20-2009, 07:13 PM

The problem is nobody (read: mods and admins) doing anything about it.

But don't speak bad about cutler or you will be blackballed.

~Crash~

12-20-2009, 07:15 PM

When you find it, let me know. This place is a lost cause.:welcome:

avatars:thumbsup:

Taco John

12-20-2009, 07:17 PM

The one this used to be. Before it got filled with always right douche bags.

This one has never been positive after Raiders home losses. If you find the board that can put a brave face after Raiders home losses, PM me.

ant1999e

12-20-2009, 07:22 PM

This place is a bitch fest even after a win.

rugbythug

12-20-2009, 07:22 PM

This one has never been positive after Raiders home losses. If you find the board that can put a brave face after Raiders home losses, PM me.

I am not looking for Positive. I am trying to avoid I told you so Douchebags Since Shanahan this place has had one set or another. Its annoying and has no value. What good does whining about old coaches who will never be back do? I mean Besides remind me of people who think HS was the Ultimate.

Finger Roll

12-20-2009, 07:27 PM

This one has never been positive after Raiders home losses. If you find the board that can put a brave face after Raiders home losses, PM me.

LOLHilarious!

Losing to the Raiders with the Playoffs on the line will do that to any Football message board. I wonder what the Steelers message board looked like after the loss to the Raiders.

KipCorrington25

12-20-2009, 07:29 PM

I agree, when our red zone strategy is either run up the middle and get stuffed all season, a fade that never works or gimmick passes to our LT we're screwed.

Taco John

12-20-2009, 07:30 PM

I am not looking for Positive. I am trying to avoid I told you so Douchebags Since Shanahan this place has had one set or another. Its annoying and has no value. What good does whining about old coaches who will never be back do? I mean Besides remind me of people who think HS was the Ultimate.

Every message board I've ever been involved in has had this as an element. We're in the middle of a coaching transition. This organization isn't used to coaching transition. It's used to stability. If there is a Broncos forum right now that is not crying bloody murder after losing to the 4 win Raiders, then it's hosted by the Stepford wives.

Not that I'm trying to apologize for this board. This is about what I'd expect from a home loss to the four win Raiders. There's nothing remarkable about this meltdown except that there are a few fans who are for some reason upset about the fact that people are melting down this time around. We've never really had that element before.

Broncolorado

12-20-2009, 07:32 PM

Here's a good Broncos board.Always positive
http://boisestate.rivals.com/forum.asp?sid=1114&fid=2675

Popps

12-20-2009, 07:56 PM

I must unfortunately agree. This place is going down hill thanks to the likes of Dragqueens and pot smoking hippies.

Hilarious!

CBF1

12-20-2009, 08:57 PM

I blame Obama and the green party voters

broncocalijohn

12-20-2009, 09:10 PM

do you want the board with or with out Casino Royal? Broncosforums is good but not enough hatred and drama going on there like i get with the Mane.

strafen

12-20-2009, 09:24 PM

I must unfortunately agree. This place is going down hill thanks to the likes of Dragqueens and pot smoking hippies.Really?
List your contributions to this board other than your sexual innuendos you offer in just about everytime you post.
Tell me what is it that I post you don't agree with?
Make a case and let me know.
I'm listening...

Taco John

12-20-2009, 11:33 PM

do you want the board with or with out Casino Royal? Broncosforums is good but not enough hatred and drama going on there like i get with the Mane.

Man, I just did a tour of all the Broncos forums that I know, and I just don't see where the tone anywhere else is all that different. There seems to be a lot of McNamecalling, and despair. Which is how it should be after losing to a 4 win Raider team at home.

TheReverend

12-20-2009, 11:40 PM

Man, I just did a tour of all the Broncos forums that I know, and I just don't see where the tone anywhere else is all that different. There seems to be a lot of McNamecalling, and despair. Which is how it should be after losing to a 4 win Raider team at home.

Shhhhhhhhhh

Let them go.

watermock

12-20-2009, 11:52 PM

I told ya so!

Happy now?

bpc

12-20-2009, 11:55 PM

For some complaining about people bringing up our old coach, Mike Shanahan or his old protege, Jay Cutler, can we get a count on who is? Guaranteed it's not the people originally pissed off about it. More so it's those that are trying to deflect criticism off their failed chosen one's.

Take for instance popps... i've read this type of quote a bunch tonight...

"the offense needed to score points but if it was Jay Cutler back there, he would have just thrown a INT..."

The people that want the old Shanny supporters to get over it are the ones who keep bringing it up. Most of us have moved on, unfortunately bashing Cutler who like all the Bears is having terrible year, is the only way to offset how truly pathetic Kyle Orton and McDaniels have been this year.

Popps

12-21-2009, 12:00 AM

The people that want the old Shanny supporters to get over it are the ones who keep bringing it up. Most of us have moved on.

:spit::spit::spit:
ROFL!ROFL!ROFL!

Holy ****.

That might be the funniest post of the year.

That is just precious.

Flamey McSpamTroll spends 24/7 ****ting on the board incessantly, but claims to have "moved on."

Honestly, you can't make up **** that good.

Taco John

12-21-2009, 12:03 AM

I don't believe either side has moved on. From my board tour tonight, I'd say that the divorce is raging with a white hot heat still re-kindled by a Raider loss at home.

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 12:35 AM

Really?
List your contributions to this board other than your sexual innuendos you offer in just about everytime you post.
Tell me what is it that I post you don't agree with?
Make a case and let me know.
I'm listening...

Don't you have a Hillis poster to jack off to?:~ohyah!:

bpc

12-21-2009, 01:21 AM

:spit::spit::spit:
ROFL!ROFL!ROFL!

Holy ****.

That might be the funniest post of the year.

That is just precious.

Flamey McSpamTroll spends 24/7 ****ting on the board incessantly, but claims to have "moved on."

Honestly, you can't make up **** that good.

Sadly, all you do right now is tear on former Shanny players like Peyton Hillis, Brandon Marshall, Elvis Dumervil, and now the OLine. This secretly massages your ego and helps you to think that Fail Orton really isn't that bad of a QB.

Pretty pathetic really. Rest easy my friend. Kyle Orton will have a better record than Jay Cutler. I'm sure that's all you really care about to fuel your arguments.

Hulamau

12-21-2009, 04:35 AM

They are having trouble in the red zone, they decide to fix them by an illegal pass to their LT who almost gets killed when upended on the tackle?

1st off when the team lined up someone should have seen Marshall covering Clady and called a time out. No one paid attention and it cost them five yards for Illegal touching. ........

That was my main beef with it, if you're gonna try it at least freaking line it up RIGHT!

The thing is, for all the lip service some of these guys paid to making this a playoff game, or taking the Raiders seriously .. some of them clearly did not .. starting with most of the Oline. Hochstein got owned enough times by Warren to make me pine for Hamilton.

Major Oline overhaul coming with at least two if not three new starters next year.

Is seems to me that half these players just don't know how to win consistently.. They only get up when their backs are against the wall.

They are now so lets see what happens in Philly .

If Dallas beat the Saints in the Superdome, no reason we couldn't shock Philly too .... with some magic dust in our pockets.

We beat the Eagles then there should be enough momentum to close out the Chiefs and still likely squeak in. Some of these other teams now in the mix will lose one of their next two as well, so it isn't officially over until and unless we lose next week.

Just a damn pisser its come to this though.

Gort

12-21-2009, 04:52 AM

This place is a b**** fest even after a win.

2006: 9-7
2007: 7-9
2008: 8-8
2009: 8-6

Broncos fans expect playoff teams year in and year out. these past 4 seasons have been hugely frustrating. people login here to vent because they need to release their emotions after 4 years of frustration (actually more like 10+ years of frustration since the last SB). what are they supposed to be doing? pretending that all is well and talking about hypothetical draft picks in 2011?

i'll never understand that small group of people who consider themselves better fans than everyone else just because they DON'T get upset when their team loses. the only way that works is if those fans don't expect anything from their team other than to show up and put their uniform on correctly.

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 09:20 AM

2006: 9-7
2007: 7-9
2008: 8-8
2009: 8-6

Broncos fans expect playoff teams year in and year out. these past 4 seasons have been hugely frustrating. people login here to vent because they need to release their emotions after 4 years of frustration (actually more like 10+ years of frustration since the last SB). what are they supposed to be doing? pretending that all is well and talking about hypothetical draft picks in 2011?

i'll never understand that small group of people who consider themselves better fans than everyone else just because they DON'T get upset when their team loses. the only way that works is if those fans don't expect anything from their team other than to show up and put their uniform on correctly.

Like I said, they bitch after we win. We kicked the **** out of the chiefs and the bitches were on here crying about hillis not getting the ball enough. It's not about us winning or loosing, it's about their hatred for McDaniels.

Gort

12-21-2009, 09:22 AM

Like I said, they b**** after we win. We kicked the **** out of the chiefs and the b****es were on here crying about hillis not getting the ball enough. It's not about us winning or loosing, it's about their hatred for McDaniels.

if your beef is with the "i told you so crowd", then that's fine. i'm ok with that. i just think that the rest of the fans should be able to come on the OM and be pissed after a loss and post what they're pissed about.

Chris

12-21-2009, 09:25 AM

This board is

Iraqi Politics

Rabb

12-21-2009, 09:27 AM

just use the ignore feature, seriously

I have checked out many boards and always come back here eventually

or here is a thought, get off the internet and do something else

Taco John

12-21-2009, 09:29 AM

Like I said, they b**** after we win. We kicked the **** out of the chiefs and the b****es were on here crying about hillis not getting the ball enough. It's not about us winning or loosing, it's about their hatred for McDaniels.

I think we'd have had a better chance of beating the Raiders if we had Hillis in as a option on third downs. We wouldn't have needed to get so creative with passes to our left tackle. We could have just handed the ball to Hillis and pointed him at a line backer.

Don't tell me that it's not about wanting us to win, because I wouldn't care about Hillis if I didn't think having him contribute wouldn't lead to an increased chance of winning. I understand that there are some people who have changed their mind on Hillis. I don't happen to be one of them. I think the guy is a throwback to guys like Riggins, and that its ridiculous for a coach to talk about a physical style of football, and then not utilize the 250 lb. battering ram - and frankly am perplexed how anyone could rationalize it after what we all witnessed the guy do last season.

Tombstone RJ

12-21-2009, 09:31 AM

I don't bother with other boards. If you want the ugly truth, come to the Mane. You may not agree with a lot of what is posted, but you certainly will be heard (or read, or whatever).

Sure, there's lots of crap here, but there's also some seriously funny posts.

Gort

12-21-2009, 09:33 AM

I think we'd have had a better chance of beating the Raiders if we had Hillis in as a option on third downs. We wouldn't have needed to get so creative with passes to our left tackle. We could have just handed the ball to Hillis and pointed him at a line backer.

Don't tell me that it's not about wanting us to win, because I wouldn't care about Hillis if I didn't think having him contribute wouldn't lead to an increased chance of winning. I understand that there are some people who have changed their mind on Hillis. I don't happen to be one of them. I think the guy is a throwback to guys like Riggins, and that its ridiculous for a coach to talk about a physical style of football, and then not utilize the 250 lb. battering ram - and frankly am perplexed how anyone could rationalize it after what we all witnessed the guy do last season.

there's clearly more to the story. we could be down to 200-0 in the 4th quarter of a game with all of our running backs injured except hillis and it seems that McD would still rather punt on 1st down than give hillis a touch. he didn't use him at all yesterday. stubborn coach refusing to have the fans/media tell him what to do... or he hates hillis... or something. but it doesn't make sense at this point. i hate to say it, but it looks like hillis needs a change of scenery. there are teams out there that will give him a shot. DET for one. for his sake, i hope he gets a shot before his short career is over.

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 09:34 AM

if your beef is with the "i told you so crowd", then that's fine. i'm ok with that. i just think that the rest of the fans should be able to come on the OM and be pissed after a loss and post what they're pissed about.

Between the "I told you so" people and the "Hillis is god " people.

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 09:44 AM

I think we'd have had a better chance of beating the Raiders if we had Hillis in as a option on third downs. We wouldn't have needed to get so creative with passes to our left tackle. We could have just handed the ball to Hillis and pointed him at a line backer.

Don't tell me that it's not about wanting us to win, because I wouldn't care about Hillis if I didn't think having him contribute wouldn't lead to an increased chance of winning. I understand that there are some people who have changed their mind on Hillis. I don't happen to be one of them. I think the guy is a throwback to guys like Riggins, and that its ridiculous for a coach to talk about a physical style of football, and then not utilize the 250 lb. battering ram - and frankly am perplexed how anyone could rationalize it after what we all witnessed the guy do last season.

The guys who come here after a win and bitch about how hillis didn't get enough/any carries? What's their excuse? McDaniels hate. I would like to see hillis get more touches especially with buck out but the hillis nuthuggers make me sick of the guy.

Rabb

12-21-2009, 09:45 AM

The guys who come here after a win and b**** about how hillis didn't get enough/any carries? What's their excuse? McDaniels hate. I would like to see hillis get more touches especially with buck out but the hillis nuthuggers make me sick of the guy.

normally I am with you, until this last game

this last game, Hillis was the best #2 option...I have no doubt in my mind

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 09:55 AM

I told ya so!

Happy now?

What is it you told us? My mind is slipping. Was it when you said you were happy Muslims were dying? Or did you accidentally eat a Reeses piece?

Cito Pelon

12-21-2009, 10:26 AM

I don't believe either side has moved on. From my board tour tonight, I'd say that the divorce is raging with a white hot heat still re-kindled by a Raider loss at home.

And that hot #22 is waiting in the wings as the trophy wife.

Dreadnought

12-21-2009, 11:05 AM

Every message board I've ever been involved in has had this as an element. We're in the middle of a coaching transition. This organization isn't used to coaching transition. It's used to stability. If there is a Broncos forum right now that is not crying bloody murder after losing to the 4 win Raiders, then it's hosted by the Stepford wives.

Not that I'm trying to apologize for this board. This is about what I'd expect from a home loss to the four win Raiders. There's nothing remarkable about this meltdown except that there are a few fans who are for some reason upset about the fact that people are melting down this time around. We've never really had that element before.

Well, thats pretty much the story over at Broncosforums. Thought I might pop in here to see if I could find much Christmas spirit, but Nada.

OTOH, losing to the friggin Raiders makes me want to beat my dog under the best of circumstances. This year just a little more so.

DBroncos4life

12-21-2009, 11:20 AM

Who isn't thrilled that we are reaching the RZ less then last year, converting less then last year when we do reach the RZ, scoring less then last year, less yards then last year and the fact that we need to replace our O-line from C, LG, RG now because the guys we have don't fit the new system. INTs are down so I guess we are moving forward there. ;D

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 11:22 AM

Cito Pelon

12-21-2009, 11:24 AM

Well, thats pretty much the story over at Broncosforums. Thought I might pop in here to see if I could find much Christmas spirit, but Nada.

OTOH, losing to the friggin Raiders makes me want to beat my dog under the best of circumstances. This year just a little more so.

Why pick on the dog, who is your buddy? Go beat a Raider fan, sheesh. The dog doesn't deserve a beating, but . . . . you follow?

go_broncos

12-21-2009, 11:27 AM

I think we'd have had a better chance of beating the Raiders if we had Hillis in as a option on third downs. We wouldn't have needed to get so creative with passes to our left tackle. We could have just handed the ball to Hillis and pointed him at a line backer.

Don't tell me that it's not about wanting us to win, because I wouldn't care about Hillis if I didn't think having him contribute wouldn't lead to an increased chance of winning. I understand that there are some people who have changed their mind on Hillis. I don't happen to be one of them. I think the guy is a throwback to guys like Riggins, and that its ridiculous for a coach to talk about a physical style of football, and then not utilize the 250 lb. battering ram - and frankly am perplexed how anyone could rationalize it after what we all witnessed the guy do last season.

I am pretty sure we would have won the game easily had Hillis started the game.
He did something very bad to Mcd(personally).
I hope Bowlen speaks to Mcd and asks him the reason..
We are getting screwed because of Mcd's arrogance.

gunns

12-21-2009, 11:28 AM

But don't speak bad about cutler or you will be blackballed.

If that were the case 90% of the members would have been blackballed by now.

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 11:29 AM

Dreadnought

12-21-2009, 11:29 AM

Why pick on the dog, who is your buddy? Go beat a Raider fan, sheesh. The dog doesn't deserve a beating, but . . . . you follow?

They are now pretty scarce where I live. They mostly swapped that bandwagon for the Pats a few years back. That's not a complaint of course - Silver and Black is a pretty ghey combination frankly, and I don't mind seeing less of it. Plus, beating the dog keeps me out of jail; if I beat my wife or kid they might haul me off to jail or something - where I would meet some of the few remaining Raider fans

Beantown Bronco

12-21-2009, 11:30 AM

I am pretty sure we would have won the game easily had Hillis started the game.
He did something very bad to Mcd(personally).
I hope Bowlen speaks to Mcd and asks him the reason..
We are getting screwed because of Mcd's arrogance.

Go watch the first Oakland game from week three again. Hillis was in there on 3 goal line plays in the first series of the game. Result?

false start on him
stuffed
stuffed

Yup, he'd make all the difference in the world.

DBroncos4life

12-21-2009, 11:32 AM

Yes. I wish it was last year. Or RZ scoring record was tremendous.

You do know we are down from 54.5% to 42.5% in the RZ this year right? We are a ****ing well oiled machine in some of your peoples minds.

gunns

12-21-2009, 11:33 AM

Like I said, they b**** after we win. We kicked the **** out of the chiefs and the b****es were on here crying about hillis not getting the ball enough. It's not about us winning or loosing, it's about their hatred for McDaniels.

Whoop, another example of one of those always right douche bags. Have you ever thought of psychology? Never mind, they're usually wrong too in their assessments of people's psyche's.

gunns

12-21-2009, 11:34 AM

Go watch the first Oakland game from week three again. Hillis was in there on 3 goal line plays in the first series of the game. Result?

false start on him
stuffed
stuffed

Yup, he'd make all the difference in the world.

Seems to me this was an entirely different game. It wouldn't have hurt to try.

Taco John

12-21-2009, 11:35 AM

Go watch the first Oakland game from week three again. Hillis was in there on 3 goal line plays in the first series of the game. Result?

false start on him
stuffed
stuffed

Yup, he'd make all the difference in the world.

I don't think that you can put a running back in cold like that and expect him to dominate. It can happen, I suppose, but most runningbacks need to get 5 carries just to get warmed up and ready for contact.

Beantown Bronco

12-21-2009, 11:36 AM

Seems to me this was an entirely different game. It wouldn't have hurt to try.

We're blocking even worse now than we were then.

Ambiguous

12-21-2009, 11:37 AM

Beantown Bronco

12-21-2009, 11:38 AM

I don't think that you can put a running back in cold like that and expect him to dominate. It can happen, I suppose, but most runningbacks need to get 5 carries just to get warmed up.

True, but he was in there for a few plays prior to this. He wasn't running the ball, but he was warmed up at least as much as one can be in the first drive of the game.

And I think it's safe to say we'd all take Moreno's first five carries over his last five carries from yesterday.

Taco John

12-21-2009, 11:42 AM

True, but he was in there for a few plays prior to this. He wasn't running the ball, but he was warmed up at least as much as one can be in the first drive of the game.

And I think it's safe to say we'd all take Moreno's first five carries over his last five carries from yesterday.

That's sure not in dispute. Maybe we can agree that we'd rather see Hillis given opportunities in short yardage rather than gadget passes to Clady?

Pony Boy

12-21-2009, 11:45 AM

I don't think that you can put a running back in cold like that and expect him to dominate. It can happen, I suppose, but most runningbacks need to get 5 carries just to get warmed up.

After Stokley's catch and run, I think McDaniels could of grabbed Hillis by the facemask and told him to go out there and get the "mother-*******" football in the endzone and it would of been done.......... one thing for sure is I know Hillis would of snagged those screens out of the backfield that were muffed.

MplsBronco

12-21-2009, 11:46 AM

just use the ignore feature, seriously

I have checked out many boards and always come back here eventually

or here is a thought, get off the internet and do something else

Bingo! The post counts for some people on here indicate the need to get a life.

Rohirrim

12-21-2009, 11:49 AM

I don't think that you can put a running back in cold like that and expect him to dominate. It can happen, I suppose, but most runningbacks need to get 5 carries just to get warmed up and ready for contact.

Maybe it's because we're not using the ZBS? Of course, yesterday I couldn't tell what they were using. Since they just got pushed back off the ball every time, it was hard to tell what the scheme was.

Rohirrim

12-21-2009, 11:50 AM

Bingo! The post counts for some people on here indicate the need to get a life.

Lead the way.

DrFate

12-21-2009, 12:07 PM

This board has not recovered from the fracture that happened when Sparky was hired. I agree with Taco - a fanbase that is used to stability simply doesn't handle this kind of transition well.

From where I sit - the 'fan police' really turned this into a dark and dreary place. Either chug the Kool Aid or be branded a bad fan. As the team has careened to the current record, there isn't anything consistent to hang onto. There is no consensus - the coach, the QB, the defense - nobody has executed well enough to be agreeable to everyone.

The team will likely miss the playoffs (like last year) with a late season swoon (like last year) and there will be questions about personnel (like last year). Swapping Shanny/Cutler for Sparky/Orton has been a wash.

Cito Pelon

12-21-2009, 12:43 PM

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 12:53 PM

normally I am with you, until this last game

this last game, Hillis was the best #2 option...I have no doubt in my mind

No argument from me on that.

Greatspirits

12-21-2009, 12:57 PM

Its the Retardlicans! they've completely destroyed this country and tried to pass the blame on someone else now there trying to do the same to this board!!

Tombstone RJ

12-21-2009, 12:58 PM

Lead the way.

Mpls has 846 posts since 2002. You, have 28k+ posts since 2003. Mpls has a point. You do not.

ant1999e

12-21-2009, 01:00 PM

Whoop, another example of one of those always right douche bags. Have you ever thought of psychology? Never mind, they're usually wrong too in their assessments of people's psyche's.

Always right? WTF are you talking about? The ones that guarantee we would be better off with hillis starting are the always right crowd. I'm tired of hearing the bitching after a win on how hillis should have got more touches. You must be one of those armchair coach douche bags who are riding hillis' cock.

Rohirrim

12-21-2009, 01:10 PM

Mpls has 846 posts since 2002. You, have 28k+ posts since 2003. Mpls has a point. You do not.

Perhaps someday I'll give a **** what you think.

Then again. Probably not.

Tombstone RJ

12-21-2009, 01:20 PM

Perhaps someday I'll give a **** what you think.

Then again. Probably not.

Post # 28,655, nice. Hilarious!

Rohirrim

12-21-2009, 01:22 PM

Post # 28,655, nice. Hilarious!

And you've been on the board since 2002 and have pretty much been an asshole the entire time.

So you've got that going for ya. :thumbsup:

Tombstone RJ

12-21-2009, 01:25 PM

And you've been on the board since 2002 and have pretty much been an a-hole the entire time.

So you've got that going for ya. :thumbsup:

I just like to point out irony when I see it. :flower:

Rohirrim

12-21-2009, 01:28 PM

I just like to point out irony when I see it. :flower:

Okay by me. I just come here to practice my typing. :wave:

barryr

12-21-2009, 02:21 PM

This forum has indeed been mostly about how great Shanahan was, (ignore the last decade), how great Cutler is(ignore all his picks), and how great players like Hillis and Scheffler are(ignore they make as many mistakes as positive plays). Great stuff.

strafen

12-21-2009, 07:11 PM

Always right? WTF are you talking about? The ones that guarantee we would be better off with hillis starting are the always right crowd. I'm tired of hearing the b****ing after a win on how hillis should have got more touches. You must be one of those armchair coach douche bags who are riding hillis' cock.Dude, you need to gggle another board for gay people.
You love mentioning cocks every time you get a chance to insult people.
How old are you?
You aren't getting any, are you?
Grow up and quit bitching!

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 07:20 PM

http://www.orangemane.com/BB/showthread.php?t=87811

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 07:23 PM

Like I said, they b**** after we win. We kicked the **** out of the chiefs and the b****es were on here crying about hillis not getting the ball enough. It's not about us winning or loosing, it's about their hatred for McDaniels.

Perhaps you could explain to us... in depth... why LaMont Jordan (who has been inactive week after week after week recently) was carrying the football instead of Hillis...

McDman

12-21-2009, 07:27 PM

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 07:31 PM

Perhaps you could explain to us... in depth... why LaMont Jordan (who has been inactive week after week after week recently) was carrying the football instead of Hillis...

Because the COACH thinks he is a better player, an opinion I trust over the housewives, dentists and whatnot that post here.

strafen

12-21-2009, 07:49 PM

Wait, are you a drag queen?Do you like to find out?

McDman

12-21-2009, 08:12 PM

Do you like to find out?

Naw, you just got offended by his drag queen comment so I thought maybe you were.

~Crash~

12-21-2009, 08:17 PM

normally I am with you, until this last game

this last game, Hillis was the best #2 option...I have no doubt in my mind

that fat ass trying to catch a football was a classic. someone should make a gift out of it ....

strafen

12-21-2009, 08:19 PM

Naw, you just got offended by his drag queen comment so I thought maybe you were.I'm sorry. My bad.
He's been on my case for a while. I must've hit a nerve.
That's how he rolls...

~Crash~

12-21-2009, 08:21 PM

Because the COACH thinks he is a better player, an opinion I trust over the housewives, dentists and whatnot that post here.

proof pull out any stat that shows fat ass should of played yesterday instead of Hills any stat and I will gladly tell you you are a liar. there is no stats ...you ass hat

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 08:22 PM

Because the COACH thinks he is a better player, an opinion I trust over the housewives, dentists and whatnot that post here.

Right. To be sure we'd have lost the game (oops looks like we did lose) without Jordan's 27 yard contribution.

"COACH" also has been the one who decided to put Jordan on the inactives list almost on a weekly basis all year, hasn't he?

Jordan has always been a waste of a roster slot.

~Crash~

12-21-2009, 08:26 PM

Right. To be sure we'd have lost the game (oops looks like we did lose) without Jordan's 27 yard contribution.

"COACH" also has been the one who decided to put Jordan on the inactives list almost on a weekly basis all year, hasn't he?

Jordan has always been a waste of a roster slot.

So True !!!!!!!!!!

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 08:36 PM

86 total rushing yards through Week 15.... yeah, that's a quality FA acquisition.... ::)

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 08:38 PM

proof pull out any stat that shows fat ass should of played yesterday instead of Hills any stat and I will gladly tell you you are a liar. there is no stats ...you ass hat

What the hell is an ass hat!! :spit:

Dagmar

12-21-2009, 08:39 PM

Sorry. This is the Mane! Hillis is the best RB in the NFL! FIRE COACH DUMMY!

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 08:42 PM

Sorry. This is the Mane! Hillis is the best RB in the NFL! FIRE COACH DUMMY!

The point is... LaMont Jordan sucks... and was (still is) a waste of a roster slot.

McDman

12-21-2009, 08:51 PM

I'm sorry. My bad.
He's been on my case for a while. I must've hit a nerve.
That's how he rolls...

It's all good, although it would have been kinda weird if you actually were a drag queen.

Dreadnought

12-21-2009, 08:52 PM

The point is... LaMont Jordan sucks... and was (still is) a waste of a roster slot.

I am impressed with his lack of speed and body fat, personally. Oh, and his lack of explosion, which I guess goes with the slow and fat part.

As far as getting on Hillis fans, it would be a stronger argument if Knowshon Moreno ran with any vision or power himself. As it stands he is cranking out a feeble 3.9 YPC and hasn't shown enough to really warrant keeping anyone on the bench. Except perhaps fat slow Lamont Jordan.

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 09:16 PM

I am impressed with his lack of speed and body fat, personally. Oh, and his lack of explosion, which I guess goes with the slow and fat part.

As far as getting on Hillis fans, it would be a stronger argument if Knowshon Moreno ran with any vision or power himself. As it stands he is cranking out a feeble 3.9 YPC and hasn't shown enough to really warrant keeping anyone on the bench. Except perhaps fat slow Lamont Jordan.

"Lazy" and "unmotivated" are also adjectives that have been used to describe LaMont Jordan during his less-than-stellar NFL career...

Rather reminiscent of JaMarcus Russell, actually.

TomServo

12-21-2009, 09:57 PM

this board and all bronco boards were Doomed the second the cutler for cassel story broke. Mcd believers and shanny fans picked sides and were waiting for the season to go south or, kick a ss and take the division and (or) make the playoffs.
who knew Mcd would give both sides all the ammo they need to say i told you so.

strafen

12-21-2009, 10:55 PM

It's all good, although it would have been kinda weird if you actually were a drag queen.Hopefully you've got enough of that joke...

Los Broncos

12-21-2009, 10:59 PM

The point is... LaMont Jordan sucks... and was (still is) a waste of a roster slot.

If Jordan sucks so bad what does McDaniels think of Hillis?

He just doesn't like him, that's all there is to it.

Blueflame

12-21-2009, 11:30 PM

If Jordan sucks so bad what does McDaniels think of Hillis?

He just doesn't like him, that's all there is to it.

Obviously McDaniels doesn't think Jordan is all that. Otherwise, wouldn't he have touched the football more than 25 times through 15 weeks of the season?

Dunno what Hillis has done (or not done) to get into McDaniels' doghouse, but... Hillis does have a higher yards-per-carry average (4.5) than Jordan (3.4)... and unlike Jordan, Hillis has found the endzone once this year.

PaintballCLE

12-21-2009, 11:46 PM

TomServo

12-21-2009, 11:51 PM

true but we did lose to a worse raider team last year at home

but i thought this years team as different?

ant1999e

12-22-2009, 12:46 AM

Perhaps you could explain to us... in depth... why LaMont Jordan (who has been inactive week after week after week recently) was carrying the football instead of Hillis...

See post #66. Seriously, pay attention. I am making the point that after the CHIEFS game, people were complaining that hillis didn't carry the ball enough. I agree hillis should have started in front of jordan.

ant1999e

12-22-2009, 12:53 AM

Dude, you need to gggle another board for gay people.
You love mentioning cocks every time you get a chance to insult people.
How old are you?
You aren't getting any, are you?
Grow up and quit b****ing!

I only mention hillis' cock when I'm talking about you dragqueen.

Blueflame

12-22-2009, 01:25 AM

See post #66. Seriously, pay attention. I am making the point that after the CHIEFS game, people were complaining that hillis didn't carry the ball enough. I agree hillis should have started in front of jordan.

OK. Point is... Jordan sucks and shouldn't even have been signed (only reason he was is that he once polished the bench for the New England Asterisks).

ant1999e

12-22-2009, 07:34 AM

OK. Point is... Jordan sucks and shouldn't even have been signed (only reason he was is that he once polished the bench for the New England Asterisks).

Your point I guess. I never spoke of jordan until you brought him up so it can't be my point.

Blueflame

12-22-2009, 03:10 PM

Your point I guess. I never spoke of jordan until you brought him up so it can't be my point.

Why would I be trying to make your point? I don't know... or much care... what your point is.

At any rate... some Broncos fans may be upset about Hillis not getting enough playing time for the simple reason that they perceive him to be a better option than LaMont Jordan (with Buckhalter out, if Hillis isn't on the field it's because Jordan is... and that's what makes this about Jordan). A belief that LaMont Jordan sucks... and therefore disgust with seeing his fat lazy butt on the field does not automatically translate into blind "hatred for McDaniels" as your post (#31) appeared to attempt to suggest. One can disagree with any given coach's decisions without necessarily hating that coach. Example: I liked Mike Shanahan but absolutely hated his decision to acquire Dale Carter...

ant1999e

12-22-2009, 07:17 PM

Why would I be trying to make your point? I don't know... or much care... what your point is.

At any rate... some Broncos fans may be upset about Hillis not getting enough playing time for the simple reason that they perceive him to be a better option than LaMont Jordan (with Buckhalter out, if Hillis isn't on the field it's because Jordan is... and that's what makes this about Jordan). A belief that LaMont Jordan sucks... and therefore disgust with seeing his fat lazy butt on the field does not automatically translate into blind "hatred for McDaniels" as your post (#31) appeared to attempt to suggest. One can disagree with any given coach's decisions without necessarily hating that coach. Example: I liked Mike Shanahan but absolutely hated his decision to acquire Dale Carter...

You quoted me. I was talking about posters on this board and their obsession over hillis. You quoted me and replied regarding jordan. Your comment had nothing to do with mine, but you argued it anyway. Go back and read before you reply again so you can understand what's going on.

In post #31, I was referencing the Chiefs game. Did jordan play that game? NO!!! My point was we won and hillis got some carries (jordan didn't play) but people still bitched that hillis didn't get the ball enough. Like I said in post #66, I agree hillis should have played over jordan in the raiders game.

If you didn't care about my point, what was the purpose of post #78?????? The fact that you couldn't follow along the conversation and I needed to explain myself shows that you're clueless.:clown:

Blueflame

12-23-2009, 02:27 AM

You quoted me. I was talking about posters on this board and their obsession over hillis. You quoted me and replied regarding jordan. Your comment had nothing to do with mine, but you argued it anyway. Go back and read before you reply again so you can understand what's going on.

In post #31, I was referencing the Chiefs game. Did jordan play that game? NO!!! My point was we won and hillis got some carries (jordan didn't play) but people still b****ed that hillis didn't get the ball enough. Like I said in post #66, I agree hillis should have played over jordan in the raiders game.

If you didn't care about my point, what was the purpose of post #78?????? The fact that you couldn't follow along the conversation and I needed to explain myself shows that you're clueless.:clown:

Yes, I did quote you. That is because your contention in Post #31 (that hatred for McDaniels is the sole reason why any Broncos fan would advocate more playing time for Hillis) is (IMHO) total horsecrap. If you're gonna pull a claim like that one out of your hindquarters, don't act so surprised to be called on it. :welcome:

ant1999e

12-23-2009, 12:02 PM

Yes, I did quote you. That is because your contention in Post #31 (that hatred for McDaniels is the sole reason why any Broncos fan would advocate more playing time for Hillis) is (IMHO) total horsecrap. If you're gonna pull a claim like that one out of your hindquarters, don't act so surprised to be called on it. :welcome:

My suggestion may not apply to all hillis fans but there are some on this board who will complain about everything McDaniels does because they dislike him. Complaining after a win about our fourth string running back not getting enough carries is one of them.
Seriously, we're talking about Peyton Hillis.

Dagmar

12-23-2009, 12:04 PM

Playing favorites eh? Like a certain poster's complete and utter hatred of all things Patriots, who didn't post much till we started losing...

Blueflame

12-23-2009, 12:30 PM

My suggestion may not apply to all hillis fans but there are some on this board who will complain about everything McDaniels does because they dislike him. Complaining after a win about our fourth string running back not getting enough carries is one of them.
Seriously, we're talking about Peyton Hillis.

Hey, I haven't been a part of the great Hillis debates; I just think he's a better option than the fat lazy slug LaMont Jordan.

Blueflame

12-23-2009, 12:34 PM

Playing favorites eh? Like a certain poster's complete and utter hatred of all things Patriots, who didn't post much till we started losing...

So what if I hate the Patriots? It's a free country and I'm far from the only football fan who intensely dislikes that franchise (I personally know at least a half dozen people who do).

And my posting has not significantly increased "since we started losing"... it's about the same rate as it's been all season (a few posts per week). :-*

Dagmar

12-23-2009, 12:37 PM

Who said I was talking about you?

ant1999e

12-23-2009, 12:54 PM

She has been trying on alot of shoes lately. I think they have all fit.

Blueflame

12-23-2009, 01:20 PM

Who said I was talking about you?

We both know you were (no one else on this forum expressed "a complete and utter hatred for all things Patriot"). I don't apologize for openly disliking the Patriots. I can see how that would be an unpopular or controversial opinion if this forum were "Patriots Planet". But it's not.