PDA

View Full Version : And you want to run my healthcare part 437


Garcia Bronco
11-16-2009, 04:15 PM
Millions will have to repay part of tax credit

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writer Stephen Ohlemacher, Associated Press Writer –

WASHINGTON – More than 15 million taxpayers could unexpectedly owe taxes when they file their federal returns next spring because the government was too generous with their new Making Work Pay tax credit.

Taxpayers are at risk if they have more than one job, are married and both spouses work, or receive Social Security benefits while also earning taxable wages, according to a report Monday by the Treasury Department's inspector general for tax administration.

The tax credit, which is supposed to pay individuals up to $400 and couples up to $800, was President Barack Obama's signature tax break in the massive stimulus package enacted in February.

Most workers started receiving the credit through small increases in their paychecks in April. The tax credit was made available through new withholding tables issued by the Internal Revenue Service.

The withholding tables, however do not take into account taxpayers with multiple jobs or married couples in which both people work. They also don't take into account Social Security recipients with jobs that provided taxable income.

The Social Security Administration sent out $250 payments to more than 50 million retirees in the spring as part of the economic stimulus package. The payments were meant to provide a boost for people who didn't' qualify for the tax credit.

However, they went to many retirees who also received the credit. Those retirees will have the $250 payment deducted from their tax credit — but not until they file their tax returns next year, long after the money may have been spent.

"While implementing a credit through reduced withholding is an effective way to provide economic stimulus evenly throughout the year, it is difficult to account for everyone's circumstances," said J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration. "More than 10 percent of all taxpayers who file individual tax returns for 2009 could owe additional taxes."

The tax credit is also available for 2010. Russell said the problems will continue in 2010 if they are not resolved.

The credit pays workers 6.2 percent of their earned income, up to a maximum of $400 for individuals and $800 for married couples who file jointly. Individuals making more than $95,000 and couples making more than $190,000 are ineligible.

"Making Work Pay was designed to deliver much needed boosts to the paychecks of 95 percent of all working Americans," said Nayyera Haq, a Treasury Department spokeswoman. "Since enactment, more than 110 million families have benefited from as much as $60 in additional take home pay each month to put toward their family budgets, serving as a steady boost to spending and consumption."

For many, the new tax tables will simply mean smaller-than-expected tax refunds next year. The average tax refund this year was about $2,800.

The IRS, in a response to the audit, advised taxpayers to check their withholding throughout the year to make sure they don't get hit with an unexpected tax bill.

"The withholding system must approximate the tax liability of tens of millions of Americans, and therefore, cannot be tailored precisely to fit every individual situation," Richard Byrd Jr., commissioner of the IRS' wage and investments division, wrote in the agency's response to the report.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091116/ap_on_bi_ge/us_tax_credit_pickle

frerottenextelway
11-16-2009, 06:08 PM
You're upset about tax cuts now?

Rigs11
11-16-2009, 09:20 PM
Wow having to pay back tax credits. Gasp!

frerottenextelway
11-17-2009, 03:39 AM
Wow having to pay back tax credits. Gasp!

Yeah, it's a good example of people who don't understand what they're reading, but sure are upset by it!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-18-2009, 09:01 AM
http://www.bartcop.com/hc-confuse-the-public.jpg

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-19-2009, 08:14 AM
I think this guy wants to thank Garcia for the BJ...

http://www.bartcop.com/pharm-addict.jpg

Garcia Bronco
11-19-2009, 09:55 AM
Yeah, it's a good example of people who don't understand what they're reading, but sure are upset by it!

It's still a **** up and wouldn't have been a problem had they left it alone.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
11-21-2009, 07:50 PM
Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (http://firedoglake.com/2009/11/20/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-maggie-mahar-money-driven-medicine-the-real-reason-health-care-costs-so-much/)

(http://firedoglake.com/?p=51406&akst_action=share-this)
http://static1.firedoglake.com/1/files/2009/11/Maggie-Mahar-Money-Driven-Medicine-book-196x300.jpg (https://www.amazon.com/dp/006076533X?tag=firedoglake-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as1&creativeASIN=006076533X&adid=0KYPDMBEPZ8GFKPNX3D8&)

FDL’s Book Salon is honored to have Maggie Mahar, health fellow at The Century Foundation, business journalist, and author of Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (https://www.amazon.com/dp/006076533X?tag=firedoglake-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as1&creativeASIN=006076533X&adid=0KYPDMBEPZ8GFKPNX3D8&). The book has been made into a film, produced by Alex Gibney (best known for Taxi to the Dark Side and Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room) and featured on Bill Moyer’s Journal. Viewers can see a streaming video of the entire film, here (http://www.moneydrivenmedicine.org/watch-in/watch-now).


Suppose you lived in a country whose health care system had become so dysfunctional, wasteful and inhumane that almost everyone with any sense realized it required fundamental reform. Everyone conceded that it cost from 50 to 100 percent more per person than comparable countries, yet if was producing no better and often worse health outcomes. They knew it was gobbling up the federal budget and capturing its GDP at a frightening, unsustainable pace. In addition it left at least 47 million uninsured, millions more underinsured and still more fraudulently insured, forced millions into bankruptcy, while too often treating those it presumably “cared” for in an uncaring, negligent, even reckless and sometimes criminal manner. How would you fix it? Where would you even begin?


The first thing you might do is try to understand how you got into such an indefensible mess, and that’s partly what Maggie Mahar does in her superbly written and exhaustively documented book, Money-Driven Medicine: The Real Reason Health Care Costs So Much (https://www.amazon.com/dp/006076533X?tag=firedoglake-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as1&creativeASIN=006076533X&adid=0KYPDMBEPZ8GFKPNX3D8&). But don’t expect a simple diagnosis or easy answers. It’s not a single “reason” but rather a complex history that has seen America’s health care system transformed by a corporate culture whose incentives are at war with basic values of good medicine.


In first tracing the last 50+ years of this devolution, Mahar describes how doctors gradually lost control of their profession to the corporate MBAs who arrogantly believed that hospital corporations could replicate Walmart. Many CEOs of for-profit hospitals became rich, driven by the need to grow and consolidate. But as they did, the biggest and worst of them — NME, Tenet, Columbia/HCA (Rick Scott), Health South — variously resorted to massive Medicare fraud, kickbacks, pervasive patient abuse and even kidnapping to fill their beds. Many executives should have gone to jail, but almost none, and no one at the top, ever did.


We often hear that “more care is not better care,” and Mahar traces the incentives that lead hospitals, doctors, device and drug makers to “do more” with insufficient attention to whether it actually improves patients or is worth the costs/risks. Contrary to market (and consumer-driven care) enthusiasts, the “supply” side too often drives demand: if hospitals are overbuilt with too many beds, it’s an incentive to prescribe more treatments, longer stays, do more tests and bring in more specialists.
Instead of solving the problem, competition makes it worse, as competing hospitals entice doctors — the doctors bring the patients — with lavish technology centers and technology “wars” — but the more MRIs you have, the more incentive there is to overprescribe their use, driving up costs but with no overall benefit to patients. And then there are the medical “mistakes,” so pervasive that one doctor observes, “Hospitals are dangerous places — especially if you do not need to be there.”


In a chapter on drug and medical device makers, Mahar anticipates the pre-reform price increases announced earlier this week. Big Pharma is not driven by increased demand so much as the need to meet Wall Street expectations, conditioned by years of spectacular profits powered in part by the Medicare drug bill of 2003. Their R&D budgets, which they claim to justify unrelenting price increases, are dwarfed by their marketing budgets and efforts, in which physician integrity becomes compromised by collusion and patients are convinced they must have the latest, more expensive drugs even though their efficacy and value remain unproven.


It’s an overwhelming, dismaying story –and I’ve touched only a tiny fraction — and through it all we read of physicians torn between the traditional ethics of their profession and the incentives and temptations of the money-driven system that surrounds them. Mahar shows the best of them struggling to create islands of ethical sanity, to collaborate and share information (using IT reforms, evidence-based medicine) in a hospital and drug industry that would rather withhold information because it’s “proprietary” or a “trade secret.” We see this system capture and corrupt everyone, including regulators during the last two administrations, even to the extent of censoring critical reports in medical journals.
Mahar summarizes the malevolent forces (178):
If you believe the Dartmouth research which says that one in three health care dollars is wasted, the conclusion is inescapable: the real reason Medicare appears to be headed for bankruptcy is not because the nation is graying, nor even simply because the cost of new technology is skyrocketing. The problem lies not in the cost of progress, but in the way we are using — and overusing — that technology in a money-driven system where device makers, drugmakers, some hospitals, and even some doctors all seem to be selling something — and selling it hard.

The obvious questions are: how do we fix this? Where do we begin? Is there some way to get back to a doctor-patient relationship based on trust, and is that enough? As Mahar notes,
The U.S. is in the only country in the developed world that has chosen to turn healthcare into a largely unregulated for-profit enterprise.
Healthcare is a necessity–like heat or light. This is why most governments regulate it, understanding that we can’t let patients be gouged.

Mahar finished Money-Driven Medicine (https://www.amazon.com/dp/006076533X?tag=firedoglake-20&camp=0&creative=0&linkCode=as1&creativeASIN=006076533X&adid=0KYPDMBEPZ8GFKPNX3D8&) in 2006, before the current debates on health reform, but she writes frequently on the current reform efforts at her blog, Health Beat (http://www.healthbeatblog.org/). We’ll have a chance to ask how well the House and Senate bills address the problems of money-driven medicine.

frerottenextelway
11-21-2009, 07:54 PM
It's still a **** up and wouldn't have been a problem had they left it alone.

No, it's not a **** up - I don't think you understand what you're reading (which is partly the fault of AP's sensationalism presentation). And it's a tax-cut, if they would've left it alone there wouldn't have been a tax-cut.

"How dare you liberals lower my taxes"