PDA

View Full Version : If Kyle Orton had 17 ints so far, what would our record be?


bronco0608
11-14-2009, 01:28 PM
Poll!

Broncotilldeath
11-14-2009, 01:31 PM
1-7

loborugger
11-14-2009, 01:31 PM
0 and 8.

Check that, we probably woulda bet Cleveland.

1 and 7.

Bronx33
11-14-2009, 01:40 PM
Not nearly enough options.

LRtagger
11-14-2009, 01:41 PM
WTF where is 3-5????????

Arkie
11-14-2009, 01:54 PM
2-6 if they were spread out an even two picks per game

6-2 or 5-3 if half of them were clumped together in a couple of games like Jay's 9 picks against the Pack and Niners

BlaK-Argentina
11-14-2009, 02:06 PM
2-6 if they were spread out an even two picks per game

6-2 or 5-3 if half of them were clumped together in a couple of games like Jay's 9 picks against the Pack and Niners

6-2? No way. 5-3 with a LOT of luck.

2-6 sounds about right. Wins against CLE and OAK.

oubronco
11-14-2009, 02:12 PM
I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

strafen
11-14-2009, 02:12 PM
Any time you hear the phrase "game manager" that means...you suck as a QB.
It means he's there to play not to lose.
Despite not having thrown any significant INT's until we played Pitts, he still had not done anything spectacular to win us any game.
I would give the game we won against NE as the only game out of 6 wins when Orton was a factor.
Other than that, he's been irrelevant on all the remaining 5 wins, and totally responsible for our two losses where he showed his inability to rally from behind and win a game when is still within our grasp...

Mogulseeker
11-14-2009, 02:27 PM
2-6.

We would have lost all those close games. Probably still have beaten Oakland and Cleveland.

Br0nc0Buster
11-14-2009, 02:33 PM
Id say 2-6 with the only wins against Cleveland and Oakland

DenverBrit
11-14-2009, 03:18 PM
Who knows, he might throw all 17 ints in one game.

DenverBound
11-14-2009, 03:29 PM
I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

You'd probably enjoy that, huh? :punched:

oubronco
11-14-2009, 03:34 PM
You'd probably enjoy that, huh? :punched:

popps would :thumbsup:

errand
11-14-2009, 10:47 PM
The funny thing is, Kyle Orton hasn't thrown 17 INT's in the same time it's taken Jay to toss 35 of them.

Popps
11-14-2009, 11:00 PM
I don't have any idea but popps would still be sucking his rod

The thing is, if you're going to be one of my stalkers, you at least need to do enough homework to know how silly that statement is.

Knowing that Cutler isn't a "franchise QB" doesn't mean I'm automatically in love with his replacement.

Sorry you've been on the wrong side of all of this. Like a lot of trolls, this has been a rough time for you.

I suggest forming some sort of support group for people that don't understand football.

oubronco
11-15-2009, 09:08 AM
The thing is, if you're going to be one of my stalkers, you at least need to do enough homework to know how silly that statement is.

Knowing that Cutler isn't a "franchise QB" doesn't mean I'm automatically in love with his replacement.

Sorry you've been on the wrong side of all of this. Like a lot of trolls, this has been a rough time for you.

I suggest forming some sort of support group for people that don't understand football.

Sorry poops the Cutler thing is long gone most people have moved on except you and we hear it week in and week out how you just love Orton's nuts so don't come at me with your weak smack about being a troll I loves me some Broncos football except for Orton mainly because he can't seem to throw an accurate pass more than 5-10 yds after that his throws are behind or way too high and he just has a knack for moving into the pass rushers instead of away from them or hit a wr in stride if he can prove it on the field more than half a game then fine i'll be on board but unfortunately he's limited in these areas :welcome:

GeniusatWork
11-15-2009, 09:26 AM
2-6 best