PDA

View Full Version : Who sucks more? Chiefs or Raiders?


Kaylore
10-25-2009, 05:34 PM
Vote!

gyldenlove
10-25-2009, 05:39 PM
Easily Oakland. Kansas City actually manages to look like a football team, a bad one, but a football team in at least half the games they play. Oakland looks more like they belong at a UCLA halloween kegger.

BMarsh615
10-25-2009, 05:39 PM
I vote Chiefs. At least the Raiders have a good passrush and running game. The Raiders have more talent.

The Chiefs are just horrible. No offensive line, no passing game, no running game, poor playcalling on both offense and defense, no passrush, horrible secondary (Flowers is just OK), young and inexperienced D-line, the worst LB core in the NFL....

Plus Matt Cassel put up Jamarcus Russell type numbers earlier today.Ha!

Ironlung
10-25-2009, 06:06 PM
which is worse, poop or vomit?

OBF1
10-25-2009, 06:19 PM
chokeland actully already beat KC

Durango
10-25-2009, 06:22 PM
That Raiders/Jets 'game' was just unbelievable. How can anyone be as bad at something he's paid to do as Jamarcus Russell? He's beyond awful. He's really an asset to the opponent, like a 12th player or something. The Jets are nothing special and they absolutely blasted these fools today, as JaMarcus Russell decided no-one on the Raiders was catching his passes, so why not start throwing to the Jets?

Rocket 7
10-25-2009, 06:22 PM
http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=216922

Cool Breeze
10-25-2009, 06:31 PM
Both are really bad!
I'm happy!

But really it is more fun with some more competition.
I'm still happy!

Orange_Beard
10-25-2009, 06:44 PM
I love AFC west football. I tried to watch the SD - Chefs today. Wow the chefs suck. They have nothing going for them.
I also could not believe how much jumping around and celebrating the chuggers were doing.

HEAV
10-25-2009, 06:45 PM
It's a tie.

Bronx33
10-25-2009, 06:53 PM
This type of calculation needs some kinda of a math major.

RhymesayersDU
10-25-2009, 06:54 PM
Vote for the Raiders sucking more, based on Cassel.

Man-Goblin
10-25-2009, 07:10 PM
Wow. Dead heat. I vote Raiders.

Killericon
10-25-2009, 07:37 PM
The Chiefs may be a worse team of football players, but the Raiders are a disgrace to the NFL, irrespective of how much they suck on field.

Raiders.

spdirty
10-25-2009, 07:45 PM
I just hope we sweep both of em, and inch a little bit closer to tightening up the all time series against both teams.

But I voted Chiefs, cuz the Raiders beat em in Arrowhead.

enjolras
10-25-2009, 07:49 PM
Didn't the Raiders already beat the Chefs this year?

FireFly
10-25-2009, 08:22 PM
the raiders have more talent, the chiefs are a better managed/coached team atm

Kaylore
10-26-2009, 12:49 AM
Didn't the Raiders already beat the Chefs this year?

Yes. In Kansas City. So I suppose it's pretty clear.

Pick Six
10-26-2009, 12:55 AM
Kansas City may still compete for the #1 overall draft pick. They are really bad...

azbroncfan
10-26-2009, 01:03 AM
the raiders have more talent, the chiefs are a better managed/coached team atm

I agree. I think Oakland is only a decent QB away from being respectable.

Bob's your Information Minister
10-26-2009, 01:04 AM
Raiders, they have no QB.

Rocket 7
10-26-2009, 01:11 AM
Raiders, they have no QB.

Which means the Chiefs do?

Bob's your Information Minister
10-26-2009, 01:22 AM
Which means the Chiefs do?

Flatt Cassel watches his diet and exercises regularly.

Archer81
10-26-2009, 01:24 AM
Asking who sucks more, the chiefs or raiders is like asking which of these do you want to die of, cancer, or burning alive.

:Broncos:

ZONA
10-26-2009, 02:51 AM
That question is like asking who is uglier. You have to say both.

http://img486.imageshack.us/img486/2928/kellyxg2.jpg
http://forum.globaltimes.cn/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=751&d=1251271564

loborugger
10-26-2009, 07:17 AM
Last week, the Raiders looked like a competent team.

KC hasnt looked like a competent team in quite a while.

TailgateNut
10-26-2009, 07:31 AM
chokeland actully already beat KC


Beat them at SUCKING. Regardless of any record, OAKLAND will always be the SuckSquad of the NFL IMO!

**** Oakland.

Muddled
10-26-2009, 07:39 AM
I was stunned to find I couln't off the top of the head name 5 Chief players who'd improve our team, when that one guy asked about it. It's close, but I'll give them the edge

cmhargrove
10-26-2009, 07:45 AM
It has been mentioned here before, but if the Raiders had held on to Garcia they might have been an 8-8 team this year. He makes his share of bonehead mistakes, but his leadership is a whole different level than Russell.

Thanks God Al Davis is still around to screw things up...

Meck77
11-04-2009, 04:14 PM
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/vPCIOfFpnYo&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/vPCIOfFpnYo&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Paladin
11-04-2009, 05:10 PM
And that is talent!

jacob2125
11-04-2009, 06:48 PM
I gotta give it to the Chiefs for achieving all around suck. This would be no contest if the Raiders had anyone but Jamarcus the Hutt at QB.

Circle Orange
11-04-2009, 06:58 PM
NFL's most frightening matchups

KC vs Rams
Rams vs Oakland
Oakland vs Detroit
Titans vs Oakland
Browns vs anybody

Bronco Warrior
11-04-2009, 07:16 PM
That is like trying to pick the Gayest Jonas brother. Both team's are uniquely disfunctional. If I was being honest I would pick Oakland but I hate them both! Oakland does have pigeon though so they get bonus points there? And which do you pick: the woman and staff beater or the Woman slapper and Fag Basher?

Bronco Rob
11-04-2009, 08:12 PM
The chefs are 3-29

haven't won a playoff game in 15 years...

Haven't even been to a Superbowl in 40 YEARS!


They suck out loud.....



:thumbs:

broncocalijohn
11-05-2009, 12:23 AM
I said the Raiders just by how retarded they are. Just check out the thread from a couple of days ago (gif) on the fake punt, Bey outrunning the guy he is supposed to tackle, Jaba, etc. They are an embarrassment that wont be cured for a long time.

broncocalijohn
11-05-2009, 12:25 AM
BTW, this is like Kaylore being your English teacher at the end of the year to give everyone bonus points because there isnt a wrong answer. They both are horrible!

Bronco Rob
11-05-2009, 09:02 AM
1.) The Kansas City Chiefs. They have one win against the Redskins.--37

2.) The Oakland Raiders. At least the Chiefs have a QB (sort of)--33

3.) Both suck the same--33

4.) I think one (or both) will break out and win the west!--2

Voters: 105.





8')

KCStud
11-05-2009, 09:14 AM
The Faiders have talent and still suck. The Chiefs plain and simply don't have much talent at all.

Peoples Champ
11-05-2009, 09:31 AM
its too hard to tell, but I will say the Chiefs are better just cuz their tailgating rocks. But they did lose to the Raiders, man I cant tell who is worse.

TailgateNut
11-05-2009, 09:34 AM
its too hard to tell, but I will say the Chiefs are better just cuz their tailgating rocks. But they did lose to the Raiders, man I cant tell who is worse.

That'll help numb the pain during meager seasons, or as is the case with the chiefs f-ing Decades.:spit:


Raiders still get the Suck Trophy!

Mountain Bronco
11-05-2009, 11:21 AM
They both suck so bad it isn't even funny. Well actually it is hillarious. They have both drafted so bad and screwed up so many trades that it is unbelievable. The Raiders coach is now accused of assaulting two women and will likely be suspended by the league. The Chiefs Coach has his players hating him for being such an ass, Casell looks overmatched without his great coach, LJ, ect... It is just WoW!

Mogulseeker
11-05-2009, 12:23 PM
The Raiders - their franchise is forever in limbo until Al Davis is no longer affiliated with them.

At least the Chiefs have a semi-competent owner.

Circle Orange
11-05-2009, 07:29 PM
I gotta give it to the Chiefs for achieving all around suck. This would be no contest if the Raiders had anyone but Jamarcus the Hutt at QB.

LOL, how can you not love his dipples? :P

The Oakland players already were grumbing they would have won at least two, probably three games with Garcia. You absolutely cannot win without qb play. I really think the raiders could be 9-7, maybe 10-6 with a legit qb. Now, they have no hope and management has no credibility with the team in constantly promoting bubblebuns.

For a funny tilt on Jamarcus, go here: http://www.bangcartoon.com/2009/tvguide.htm

full of funny NFL cartoons (some are borderline offensive and not worksafe, be warned.)

OrangeRising
11-05-2009, 11:22 PM
How could any Bronco fan hate anyone more than the Raiders. It's institutional, maybe genetic for Denver fans. The Chiefs come and go like a withering spring shower. The Raiders are eternal darkness, which may also explain why they can't seem to find their ass with both hands.

Peoples Champ
11-06-2009, 07:45 AM
That'll help numb the pain during meager seasons, or as is the case with the chiefs f-ing Decades.:spit:


Raiders still get the Suck Trophy!



Ya, I have never been to a Raider tailgate, but I cant imagine it being as good as KC, so I will say Raiders suck more.

Peoples Champ
11-06-2009, 07:46 AM
The Faiders have talent and still suck. The Chiefs plain and simply don't have much talent at all.


If the Chiefs can beat the Raiders next time, and split the season series, I will say the Chiefs are better than the Raiders

TailgateNut
11-06-2009, 07:54 AM
Ya, I have never been to a Raider tailgate, but I cant imagine it being as good as KC, so I will say Raiders suck more.

My annual Raider Hater Bash is pretty damn good. I think!;D:alky::thumbs:

bowtown
11-06-2009, 08:05 AM
I would love to see them play to a 0-0 tie this weekend.

Bronco Rob
11-06-2009, 08:14 AM
1.) The Kansas City Chiefs. They have one win against the Redskins.----43

2.) The Oakland Raiders. At least the Chiefs have a QB (sort of)------41

3.) Both suck the same------39

4.) I think one (or both) will break out and win the west!-----2


Voters: 125.



ROFL!

Bronco Rob
11-06-2009, 08:22 AM
Chokeland's last Superbowl : January 26, 2003

Kansas City's Last Superbowl : January 11, 1970



Chokeland's last playoff victory : January 19, 2003

Kansas City's last playoff victory : January 16, 1994



Telling stats.........


:wiggle:

TailgateNut
11-06-2009, 08:24 AM
Chokeland's last Superbowl : January 26, 2003

Kansas City's Last Superbowl : January 11, 1970



Chokeland's last playoff victory : January 19, 2003

Kansas City's last playoff victory : January 16, 1994



Telling stats.........


:wiggle:

Regardless, OAKLAND SWALLOWS!!!:wiggle:

Bronco Rob
11-06-2009, 02:57 PM
Regardless, OAKLAND SWALLOWS!!!:wiggle:


truth!

Peoples Champ
11-06-2009, 03:20 PM
both franchises are just god aweful

Bronco Rob
11-07-2009, 09:55 AM
1.) The Kansas City Chiefs. They have one win against the Redskins.---46

2.) The Oakland Raiders. At least the Chiefs have a QB (sort of)---45

3.) Both suck the same---41

4.) I think one (or both) will break out and win the west!---2





LOL

Circle Orange
11-07-2009, 11:07 AM
These two teams are a choice between fat and ugly. No one's a winner! :thumbsup:

Bronco Rob
11-09-2009, 06:17 AM
The Kansas City Chiefs. They have one win against the Redskins. 47

The Oakland Raiders. At least the Chiefs have a QB (sort of) 47

Both suck the same 43 30.94%

I think one (or both) will break out and win the west! 2

Voters: 139.



ROFL!

Pick Six
11-09-2009, 10:48 AM
The Chiefs made David Garrard look like a functioning quarterback, yesterday....ROFL!

Electric Chair
11-09-2009, 11:33 AM
Simply amazing poll results. Haha...

UberBroncoMan
11-09-2009, 11:37 AM
That question is like asking who is uglier. You have to say both.

http://img486.imageshack.us/img486/2928/kellyxg2.jpg
http://forum.globaltimes.cn/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=751&d=1251271564

I swear they both look like wax figure abominations.

Rohirrim
11-09-2009, 11:46 AM
The NFL is quietly looking into the possibility that Cable has mental issues. That wins it for the Faders, hands down. ;D

Archer81
11-09-2009, 04:44 PM
Its like asking what sucks more, having your junk cut off or having it torn off.

:Broncos:

Bronco Rob
11-15-2009, 03:12 PM
The Kansas City Chiefs. They have one win against the Redskins.----50

The Oakland Raiders. At least the Chiefs have a QB (sort of)----51

Both suck the same----47

I think one (or both) will break out and win the west!----2

Voters: 150.

Beantown Bronco
11-15-2009, 03:13 PM
Where is the "Chris Simms sucks more than both teams" option?

Bronco Rob
11-15-2009, 03:35 PM
Where is the "Chris Simms sucks more than both teams" option?


?????????

Beantown Bronco
11-15-2009, 03:38 PM
?????????

What don't you understand?

Bronco Rob
11-15-2009, 03:58 PM
What don't you understand?


Just saying I didn't see that option...




;)

UtahBroncos
11-15-2009, 04:36 PM
4 superbowl losses asswipes. The Raiders still lead the AFC West in SB'S

Raiders 3-2 in the bowl---- Mules 2-4 in the bowl.

Until you win 2 more SB'S, The Raiders are yor master.

It doesnt matter what year they were won. History is history.

Your inferiority complex is sick.

Bronx33
11-15-2009, 04:41 PM
ha! welcome raider fan! so why are you a bitch hiding under a bronco name? see if your not a little bitch then you will be fine on this board it's not like RF and RKA or anyother pussy raiders board that can't handle any flack from other fans.

Bronco Rob
11-15-2009, 05:20 PM
4 superbowl losses asswipes. The Raiders still lead the AFC West in SB'S

Raiders 3-2 in the bowl---- Mules 2-4 in the bowl.

Until you win 2 more SB'S, The Raiders are yor master.

It doesnt matter what year they were won. History is history.

Your inferiority complex is sick.


Hilarious!

Bronx33
11-15-2009, 05:23 PM
thanks for stopping by raiderfan you guys always find a way to make fools out of yourselves.

Kid A
11-15-2009, 05:32 PM
Looked like the Chiefs were about to blow another one to the Faid. Heyward Bey to the rescue!

Bronco Rob
11-16-2009, 03:50 AM
Looked like the Chiefs were about to blow another one to the Faid. Heyward Bey to the rescue!




:thumbs:

Denver724
11-16-2009, 08:14 AM
I think we will have our hands full with both.

strafen
11-16-2009, 08:54 AM
The funny thing is that either one of the Raiders or the Chiefs at this point have an equal chance to finish with an equal record that we will.Not likely, but you can't assume or take things for granted in the NFL...

Bronco Rob
11-17-2009, 04:05 AM
:thumbsup:

rmsanger
11-17-2009, 04:55 AM
Where's our team in this poll? We're at the top of the suckage pile right now...

azbroncfan
11-17-2009, 06:22 AM
4 superbowl losses asswipes. The Raiders still lead the AFC West in SB'S

Raiders 3-2 in the bowl---- Mules 2-4 in the bowl.

Until you win 2 more SB'S, The Raiders are yor master.

It doesnt matter what year they were won. History is history.

Your inferiority complex is sick.

How many of those Superbowls did you actually see?

Bronco Rob
11-18-2009, 04:03 AM
Rofl!

UtahBroncos
11-18-2009, 08:31 PM
Denver cant even walk with Oakland, our fans and city would stomp your little homo haven called " Denver" into the ground. I understand why Mule fans love rainbow colors. Just remember, we will come into your ****ty transient city like last year, and destroy your team.

Maybe Mcdump will get fired for losing to the Raiders at home. ****han did.

Your city is worthless pile of crud.

UtahBroncos
11-18-2009, 08:33 PM
Remember the 4 SB loses you have. You are way behind. You will never sniff another one.

Enjoy your 8-8 season. Maybe you can get Gaydy Quinn, he would fit right in with the homo city of Denver.

Rausch 2.0
11-19-2009, 12:43 AM
Just remember, we will come into your ****ty transient city like last year, and destroy your team.

Hilarious!

Rausch 2.0
11-19-2009, 12:45 AM
The funny thing is that either one of the Raiders or the Chiefs at this point have an equal chance to finish with an equal record that we will.Not likely, but you can't assume or take things for granted in the NFL...

It's possible your QB could really go down and dump your season.

Ok, possible.

I don't see how KC could win 5 or 6 more games...hmmm...

Bronco Rob
12-07-2009, 05:19 PM
Lol

Cito Pelon
12-07-2009, 05:30 PM
I'm not counting either of those teams out right now.

SJ Bronco
12-07-2009, 05:40 PM
Remember the 4 SB loses you have. You are way behind. You will never sniff another one.

Enjoy your 8-8 season. Maybe you can get Gaydy Quinn, he would fit right in with the homo city of Denver.

I live near oakland...you got some nerve calling anyone's city ANYTHING! and 26 years without winning a Superbowl must have you forgetting your place.

Kaylore
12-07-2009, 06:38 PM
So right now it's officially the Chiefs that are the worst. They get Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincy and finish in our house. They are pretty bad but you figure they might actually beat the Browns and that's it. So maybe four wins.

What a pathetic franchise.

Cito Pelon
12-07-2009, 06:50 PM
Pathetic is apt. They had some pride sometime ago. They'll be back, but it will take a few years.

Bronx33
12-07-2009, 06:56 PM
So right now it's officially the Chiefs that are the worst. They get Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincy and finish in our house. They are pretty bad but you figure they might actually beat the Browns and that's it. So maybe four wins.

What a pathetic franchise.


They need to chip in for a billboard and express their distain.;D

baja
12-07-2009, 07:07 PM
I want to change my vote from the Raiders to the Chiefs. After watching them yesterday nobody could be worse.

Kid A
12-07-2009, 07:10 PM
So right now it's officially the Chiefs that are the worst. They get Buffalo, Cleveland, Cincy and finish in our house. They are pretty bad but you figure they might actually beat the Browns and that's it. So maybe four wins.

What a pathetic franchise.

I don't think they beat Cleveland. For whatever reason the Browns seem to have at least a little pride left (they pushed to the end against SD, gave Cincy a couple good games). Chiefs have rolled over and imploded against division rivals in consecutive weeks. It will be very interesting to see if they give Haley another year.

gunns
12-07-2009, 07:33 PM
Remember the 4 SB loses you have. You are way behind. You will never sniff another one.

Enjoy your 8-8 season. Maybe you can get Gaydy Quinn, he would fit right in with the homo city of Denver.

Way behind? Broncos have been to 6 and the Raiders to 4. Hmmm and how many of those 4 were back to back? We lost as many as the Raiders have been to and while we were losing those 4 the Raiders were sitting home on their loser asses because they couldn't get there. In fact the Broncos beat the Raiders to get to one of them. You're the one that's way behind, check your history BOY.

broncosteven
12-07-2009, 08:02 PM
Raiders, they have no QB.

Their new (Gradouski?) QB is better than Cassel, Russell, and has more wins than Croyle.

Now with KFC Fans not attending games it is only a matter of time before KFC moves to LA.

Bronco Rob
12-09-2009, 04:34 AM
1.) The Kansas City Chiefs. ------------- 61

2.)The Oakland Raiders.---------------- 55

3.) Both suck the same-------------------- 49

4.) I think one (or both) will break out and win the west! -----2



LOL

kappys
12-09-2009, 07:56 AM
It all depends on the QB. With Gradowski in and Russel/Heyward Bey on the bench at least the Raiders have a semblance of a team. Granted he sucks too but he delivers the ball in the vicinity of his receivers and this kid Louis Murphy looks amazing(looked amazing in TC too if I recall but then had JaBust at QB)

bfoflcommish
12-09-2009, 08:10 AM
Utah Broncos is showing exactly why it is so easy to hate Raiders fans and just how stupid they really are, 1st he says

4 superbowl losses asswipes. The Raiders still lead the AFC West in SB'S

Raiders 3-2 in the bowl---- Mules 2-4 in the bowl.

Until you win 2 more SB'S, The Raiders are yor master.

It doesnt matter what year they were won. History is history.

Your inferiority complex is sick.



and not much later says


Denver cant even walk with Oakland, our fans and city would stomp your little homo haven called " Denver" into the ground. I understand why Mule fans love rainbow colors. Just remember, we will come into your ****ty transient city like last year, and destroy your team.

Maybe Mcdump will get fired for losing to the Raiders at home. ****han did.

Your city is worthless pile of crud.

hmmmmmm talk about inferiority complex, if yo uthink shanny got let go because he lost raiders in Denver. And please keep thinking Denver is worthless pile of crud, one less person in this city that doesnt appreciate it is perfectly fine with me

Bronco Rob
12-10-2009, 03:47 AM
The Kansas City Chiefs.------------- 67

The Oakland Raiders.----------------- 56

Both suck the same------------------ 49

I think one (or both) will break out and win the west! 2

Voters: 174.



Ha!

KCStud
12-10-2009, 12:16 PM
Chiefs will beat the Browns. I think we can beat the depleting Bills too.
Chiefs are actually heading in a positive direction from last season. Raiders draft picks are busts and not exactly working out. Gallery, McFumble, J-Bust and Huff are average at best players. Flowers, Hali, Bowe, Charles and Page are at least good players who are developing.
KC also has a QB. He has no OL and decent WR's at best(somebody cut Bobby Wade please).
Oh and those who say Cassel sucks, how about you tell me how Cassel only lost 5 games last year and Brady has already lost 5 games with the same team?

Bronco Rob
12-10-2009, 05:32 PM
I'd say it was a historic moment in franchise history, but beating the Chiefs these days doesn't qualify. Consider this: With the loss, the Chiefs are 9-35 in their last 44 games







:rofl:

Br0nc0Buster
12-10-2009, 05:42 PM
Chiefs will beat the Browns. I think we can beat the depleting Bills too.
Chiefs are actually heading in a positive direction from last season. Raiders draft picks are busts and not exactly working out. Gallery, McFumble, J-Bust and Huff are average at best players. Flowers, Hali, Bowe, Charles and Page are at least good players who are developing.
KC also has a QB. He has no OL and decent WR's at best(somebody cut Bobby Wade please).
Oh and those who say Cassel sucks, how about you tell me how Cassel only lost 5 games last year and Brady has already lost 5 games with the same team?

Heading in a positive direction huh?
Yeah how sad is it when after coming off a 44-13 stomping, the fans are telling themsevlers, "its ok things are getting BETTER"......:rofl:

Just because the Pats are not as good as they usually are doesnt excuse Cassel from playing like ****
He does suck, and not only did your team offer a high second, he is gonna prevent you from drafting an actual franchise qb at least for the time being

And the Pats are not the same team, their defense is falling apart and Brady is still recovering from his knee
The pats traded away a guy named Seymour, maybe you have heard of him, but losing someone like him would affect a team believe it or not

Br0nc0Buster
12-10-2009, 05:43 PM
The Chiefs are the obvious choice

The Raiders are not that terrible, Russel was just so god awful that benching him as already made them much better

The Raiders are never going to be a good team, but they are not complete trash like the Chiefs are right now

OBF1
12-10-2009, 05:48 PM
Sitting the 32 million dollar man on the bench is perfect. It is going to set them back at some point. The can not afford to keep paying these ultra high signing bonus' and not having the players work out. This weekend is the 6th game this season that they did not sell out leading to a local TV black out.

KCStud
12-11-2009, 12:40 AM
Heading in a positive direction huh?
Yeah how sad is it when after coming off a 44-13 stomping, the fans are telling themsevlers, "its ok things are getting BETTER"......:rofl:

Just because the Pats are not as good as they usually are doesnt excuse Cassel from playing like ****
He does suck, and not only did your team offer a high second, he is gonna prevent you from drafting an actual franchise qb at least for the time being

And the Pats are not the same team, their defense is falling apart and Brady is still recovering from his knee
The pats traded away a guy named Seymour, maybe you have heard of him, but losing someone like him would affect a team believe it or not

The team is still better than last season. I like the draft picks we got as well. Jackson and Magee are playing well and Succop is starting to look like a future franchise kicker

Bronco Rob
12-11-2009, 04:51 PM
The Kansas City Chiefs-------------------71

The Oakland Raiders----------------------56

Both suck the same----------------------50

I think one (or both) will break out and win the west------2

Voters: 179




:D

Kaylore
12-11-2009, 05:06 PM
This weekend is the 6th game this season that they did not sell out leading to a local TV black out.

Wow. That is truly epic. At least their fan base is doing something about it. Chief fans are so used to mediocrity and suck that they have come to accept it.

Bronco Rob
12-11-2009, 05:07 PM
Below are the National Football League leaders in regular-season sellouts.

1. Washington Redskins ... 327
2. Pittsburgh Steelers ... 307
3. Denver Broncos ... 301
4. San Franciso 49ers ... 267
5. New York Giants ... 264
6. Green Bay Packers ... 261
7. New York Jets ... 257
8. Chicago Bears ... 198
9. Dallas Cowboys ... 161
10. New England Patriots ... 159
11. Kansas City Chiefs ... 149
12. Baltimore Ravens ... 104
13. Tampa Bay Buccaneers ... 88
14. Indianapolis Colts ... 81
15. Philadelphia Eagles ... 80
15. Tennessee Titans ... 80



LOL

Rock Chalk
12-11-2009, 09:01 PM
I got to this party late. KC sucks more.

Oakland after ditching the fat ass Oakland does have some respectable wins.

Bronco Rob
12-19-2009, 03:10 AM
1.) The Kansas City Chiefs------73

2.) The Oakland Raiders-----------56

3.) Both suck the same-----------50

4.) I think one (or both) will break out and win the west! 2

Voters: 181



LOL

broncosteven
12-19-2009, 11:24 AM
Wow. That is truly epic. At least their fan base is doing something about it. Chief fans are so used to mediocrity and suck that they have come to accept it.

Kahn, Yours is usually the superior, but I think fans have to support their team through thick and thin rather than not go to games they need to do mass exits, not buy concessions at the game, do not buy the team merch. stuff that still hits the team in the wallet but shows there is still support for the organization so they don't feel they can use the lack of ticket sales as an excuse to move.

Sure owners can decide to move a franchise at any time but once fans stop going to games, no matter how bad the product is, that might give an owner more thought to moving into a bigger market like LA...

Bitch about the product, 2nd guess the moves, be a miserable pessimist, but don't give up on the team.

I would rather hear a stadium full of booo's than an empty stadium that is an embarassment to the league.

Add that to the fact that they are 3 years removed from the playoffs, and just changed the HC and GM, it is not like they have done nothing to turn it around.

Bronco Bob
12-19-2009, 11:29 AM
As a child I was taught by my parents to hate the Raiders.
I never even heard of the Chiefs until I was much older.

Bronco Rob
12-31-2009, 07:59 AM
Ha!

Bronco LB52
01-01-2010, 04:58 PM
The Queefs are worse than a team with a record seven-straight 10 loss seasonsLOL

Bronco Rob
01-02-2010, 04:40 AM
Ha!