View Full Version : Obama has given the go ahead for direct talks with Iran.
cutthemdown
09-12-2009, 03:27 PM
That is all!!!!
snowspot66
09-12-2009, 05:36 PM
So?
cutthemdown
09-12-2009, 05:49 PM
Sou tell me. I thought for once I would post something without giving my opinion or putting other peoples stories about it up.
I was curious to what people think about without just attacking or agreeing with what I would say about it.
So? You tell me Snow
1-smart?
2-worth a try?
3-stupid?
4-waste of time?
cutthemdown
09-12-2009, 05:55 PM
sort of proves a theory I was working on. People don't really want to give opinions as much as they do argue with people they have a competition with on the forum.
I've found myself arguing many times on subjects I'm not even passionate about, or even care about!!! Or even know anything about!!!!!
Oh well just a little rant.
In any effect as soon as Broncos kick off the season I won't be back in the politics forum.
I'll just make little jabs on the main board about football from then on.
snowspot66
09-12-2009, 06:11 PM
What kind of response were you expecting? You didn't exactly give anything to go on now did you? I don't even know what your stance is on this never mind having a competition with you on it. If you just want opinions without giving your own positive or negative then just ask for opinions.
As to Obama. I say go for it. Can't hurt anything.
barryr
09-12-2009, 06:11 PM
Liberals don't want to talk about it until they are told what to say from lefty blogs. Of course, that applies to most subjects.
I don't see what "talks" will do with Iran. The leaders there are nuts and talks aren't going to convince them to stop their plans.
What "talks" will likely end up doing is the U.S., Obama, makes promises and some sort of deal with Iran, likely money and whatever else, but then, Iran not sticking with it and continuing to do what they want.
Typical right-wing response.
There's much more to Iran that turbaned ayatollahs, you ignorant ass.
barryr
09-12-2009, 06:15 PM
I believe I stated "leaders" you stupid ****ass. Learn to read sometime. Not to mention try coming up with an opinion on the thread and not cowardly avoiding it and just attacking someone who did.
snowspot66
09-12-2009, 06:18 PM
What plans does Iran have in store for us barryr? I've been out of the loop lately but last I read they were still dealing with election repercussions and an economy that's been bitchslapped by the downturn in oil prices. I'm sure we're quite low on the list of worries.
barryr
09-12-2009, 06:22 PM
What plans does Iran have in store for us barryr? I've been out of the loop lately but last I read they were still dealing with election repercussions and an economy that's been b****slapped by the downturn in oil prices. I'm sure we're quite low on the list of worries.
What are you talking about? Plans? Wanting countless nukes isn't something great. You tell me what "talks" will solve and have solved.
peacepipe
09-12-2009, 07:39 PM
What are you talking about? Plans? Wanting countless nukes isn't something great. You tell me what "talks" will solve and have solved.
LOL as if GWBS tactic of ignoring countries like NK worked.
frerottenextelway
09-12-2009, 07:49 PM
What are you talking about? Plans? Wanting countless nukes isn't something great. You tell me what "talks" will solve and have solved.
Ummm.... the Cold War?
Bronx33
09-12-2009, 08:28 PM
Lets see if the magic mouth can screw this up.
cutthemdown
09-12-2009, 08:43 PM
LOL as if GWBS tactic of ignoring countries like NK worked.
truth is they tricked Clinton. They stopped one program while covert having a plutonium based program on the side.
Not saying Bush did well with them, but its not his fault they got a nuke. We waited to long to stop them.
We should have been busy with N Koreas nuke program back when Bush SR was in office.
Let's not make same mistake with Iran and allow then nuclear weapons.