PDA

View Full Version : Sotomayor takes oath from Chief Justice Roberts


Bronco_Beerslug
08-08-2009, 08:50 AM
Your newest member of the SC.

=================================================
Sotomayor takes oath from Chief Justice Roberts (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090808/ap_on_go_su_co/us_supreme_court_sotomayor)

By MARK SHERMAN, Associated Press Writer Mark Sherman, Associated Press Writer – 1 min ago

WASHINGTON – Sonia Sotomayor became the Supreme Court's newest justice Saturday, pledging during a brief ceremony at the high court to defend the Constitution and administer impartial justice.

Sotomayor, 55, is the first Hispanic justice and only the third woman in the court's 220-year history.


http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20090808/capt.0e2f2850850d4f418afcb532dc15f410.aptopix_supr eme_court_sotomayor_dcsa202.jpg?x=400&y=231&q=85&sig=etPnFKr.pBDva2ASdrZsHg--
Sonia Sotomayor, left, President Obama's choice to replace retiring Justice David Souter, takes the oath from Chief Justice John Roberts to become the Supreme Court's first Hispanic justice and only the third woman in the court's 220-year history, in Washington, Saturday, Aug. 8, 2009. She is joined by her brother, Juan Luis Sotomayor, and her mother Celina Sotomayor. Sotomayor, 55, has been a federal judge for 17 years. The Senate confirmed Sotomayor's nomination Thursday by a 68-31 vote.
(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)


She took the second of two oaths of office from Chief Justice John Roberts in an ornate conference room, beneath a portrait of the legendary Chief Justice John Marshall. Her left hand resting on a Bible that was held by her mother, Celina, Sotomayor pledged to "do equal right to the poor and to the rich."

Minutes earlier, she swore a first oath in a private ceremony in the room where the justices hold their private conferences.

CONTINUED

Rohirrim
08-08-2009, 08:55 AM
First hispanic? Damn. That took a long time. Congrats to her. Hopefully she can stem the tide of Scalia's rightard activism.

spdirty
08-08-2009, 09:58 AM
Scalia and Thomas need to get her head right, then she'll be fine. If not, she took over for the liberal douhebag Souter so no big loss.

Bronco_Beerslug
08-08-2009, 10:34 AM
Scalia and Thomas need to get her head right, then she'll be fine. If not, she took over for the liberal douhebag Souter so no big loss.Hopefully, during the next 8 years we can purge 1 or 2 of the more backward thinking justices out of there.

If not, she took over for the liberal douhebag Souter so no big loss.Uh huh, it was his swing vote that appointed Bush president.

Garcia Bronco
08-08-2009, 12:36 PM
Hopefully, during the next 8 years we can purge 1 or 2 of the more backward thinking justices out of there.



Is there a particular case you are thinking of?

Rohirrim
08-08-2009, 01:51 PM
Scalia and Thomas need to get her head right, then she'll be fine. If not, she took over for the liberal douhebag Souter so no big loss.

That shouldn't be too hard. According to Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito anybody who comes before the court with wealth and power is right and anybody who is not wealthy and powerful is wrong. Sotomayor could pick that up in a day.

footstepsfrom#27
08-08-2009, 04:21 PM
Very solid choice. She's both a judicial scholar and devoted to constitutional authority. It's amazing we've had only 3 women on the court in 220 years.

Spider
08-08-2009, 05:57 PM
Scalia and Thomas need to get her head right, then she'll be fine. If not, she took over for the liberal douhebag Souter so no big loss.

Douchebag ? yeah since he helped elect Bush ..........