OJ May Get An Early Release!

[rastaman]

LAS VEGAS -- Lawyers for O.J. Simpson and a former golfing buddy hope to persuade a Nevada Supreme Court panel to spring the two men from prison while the justices review their convictions of a gunpoint hotel-room heist.

Mr. Simpson and convicted co-defendant Clarence "C.J." Stewart won't be in a Las Vegas courtroom Monday for the 30-minute sessions allotted to their lawyers before a trio of justices from the state's only appellate court. Clark County District Attorney David Roger, who prosecuted the pair, will argue against release.

The justices won't make an immediate decision, but it is rare for the state high court to hear oral arguments on bond and even more rare to grant release.

Mr. Simpson, 62 years old, is serving nine to 33 years for kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon in the September 2007 confrontation with two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas casino hotel room. Mr. Stewart, 55, is serving 7 1/2 to 27 years.

Simpson lawyer Yale Galanter has said Mr. Simpson won't flee if he's released, poses no danger to the community and will comply with any conditions the high court sets.

"C.J. is hopeful the court will take a look at the record and see that there are multiple issues on appeal that should get him a new trial," said Mr. Stewart's lawyer, Brent Bryson.

Mr. Bryson argues that Mr. Stewart, a former mortgage broker from North Las Vegas, should have been tried separately from Mr. Simpson, an NFL Hall-of-Famer, television star and celebrity criminal defendant acquitted in the 1994 slaying of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, in Los Angeles.

Messrs. Galanter and Bryson said a favorable ruling from the court would signal how justices feel about their overall appeals, which are unlikely to be decided for at least a year.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124930663425101093.html

Copyright © 2009 Associated Press

[TailgateNut]

Maybe we can hire him and Vick. Bawahahah

[Spider]

Go OJ go .............http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/2008/09/custom_1222279198959_Ford-Bronco.jpg

[Spider]

Maybe we can hire him and Vick. Bawahahah

At least get vick

[rastaman]

I'll get smacked for this, but I don't think OJ did the original "crime". I watched the entire trial and the police misconduct and malfeasance was SO bad (including Mark Fuhrman), that the LAPD contaminated almost every single shred of so called evidence against him. Then, all OJ's memorabilia was pretty much heisted from him in a civil claim that, I feel, was unjustified. He was later enticed to "get his stuff back" from a phone caller who told where OJ's stuff was. OJ said he'd spoken to the holder of his stuff, but something went bad on their alleged agreement. So...

If you watched every microsecond of his original trial, you'd understand why they arrived at their verdict.

One thing I'll agree is that OJ is cocky, self centered and stupid. And, if he did do the original crime, the LAPD planted entirely too much evidence and that is what cast doubt on the crime. Johnny C mopped the floor with the states pr0secution like any good Atty. would've.

[NaptownChief]

I'll get smacked for this, but I don't think OJ did the original "crime".




I don't think you are going to find a single person on this board that is surprised by that statement.

[Garcia Bronco]

I'll get smacked for this, but I don't think OJ did the original "crime". I watched the entire trial and the police misconduct and malfeasance was SO bad (including Mark Fuhrman), that the LAPD contaminated almost every single shred of so called evidence against him. Then, all OJ's memorabilia was pretty much heisted from him in a civil claim that, I feel, was unjustified. He was later enticed to "get his stuff back" from a phone caller who told where OJ's stuff was. OJ said he'd spoken to the holder of his stuff, but something went bad on their alleged agreement. So...

If you watched every microsecond of his original trial, you'd understand why they arrived at their verdict.

One thing I'll agree is that OJ is cocky, self centered and stupid. And, if he did do the original crime, the LAPD planted entirely too much evidence and that is what cast doubt on the crime. Johnny C mopped the floor with the states pr0secution like any good Atty. would've.

Dude...they pulled his DNA from his blood at the crime scene and his truck. He effing did it.

[NaptownChief]

Dude...they pulled his DNA from his blood at the crime scene and his truck. He effing did it.


I always wondered if rastaman was on the jury, now I am convinced.

[Garcia Bronco]

I always wondered if rastaman was on the jury, now I am convinced.

Hats off to the late cockhran and his team.

[rastaman]

Dude...they pulled his DNA from his blood at the crime scene and his truck. He effing did it.

Point well taken. But you fail to realize is OJ FREELY gave his blood samples to Det. Vanatter and instead of taking the vials of blood to the evidence lab and booking it.....Vanatter ignored SOP and returned to the crime scene with OJ's vials of blood. It was later discovered that blood found on top of a linked fence at the crime scene had samples taken, and it was discovered the blood had an anti-coalagent called EDTA.

The human body doesn't produce EDTA and EDTA is applied to blood samples to prevent the samples from thickening and to keep a more liquid state. So how did EDTA get into the blood found on the fence? the answer is that blood was planted from the blood vials originally given from OJ.

Now keep this in mind the chain of custody of OJ's white SUV and its security at the police inpoundment was breached and the truck was broken into. Prior to the SUV breakin, LAPD forensic did not find blood DNA in the Bronco, however, after the break in LAPD's forensic lab reinvestigated the Bronco and suddenly their was blood DNA evidence linking OJ, to the murdered victims.

By the time OJ's original vials of blood were booked as evidence, it was discovered that over 2cc's of OJ's blood were missing!

The police were in a position to mix and plant the blood after the killings.

[rastaman]

I always wondered if rastaman was on the jury, now I am convinced.

I've often wondered whether people of your ilk watched the trial and unbiasely reviewed the chain of evidence......its obvious you did not.

[rastaman]

Hats off to the late cockhran and his team.

I think all involved now know OJ is innocent but to admit it will make them look more foolish. A crippled old man, even OJ cannot do all that horrible killing and then clean up, dispose of items and still have a relatively neat home. It is a shame they trusted Squatter Kato every word.

Then of course who would be interested in white on white killing? I do believe someone with access to OJ home did it. Oj may even know who did. Think someone young, angry, BROKE, squatter who never finished a sentence in his life. If OJ did nothing when he saw Nicole in a sexual act, it is stupid to attribute a recital as reason for murder then leave his children in a home where they may find their mothers body. I see no reason to believe the Browns.

They were dependent on OJ and probably thought OJ would never see light of day again and that would give them his children and continued access to his money. Yes there was evidence there but few who have made him guilty has never actually studied the evidence.

Rumple the leaves where the second glove was found, find more bloood in his home and light carpet give him more time and we can talk guilty, however I do think he is guilty because he knows what happened and have to protect his children. The law officers may have helped out with evidence they thought would only speed up resolution of a seemingly guilty person. Why oh Why didnt kato call the police?

He knew OJ was leaving and he would be there alone. That would have given the responding police a reason to enter his back yard and find the glove. I really feel someone in high places wanted Nicole dead and no money Kato was used to frame OJ.

[Rohirrim]

Good to hear that OJ might get an early release. He needs to get back on the trail of the "real" killer.

[Garcia Bronco]

Point well taken. But you fail to realize is OJ FREELY gave his blood samples to Det. Vanatter and instead of taking the vials of blood to the evidence lab and booking it.....Vanatter ignored SOP and returned to the crime scene with OJ's vials of blood. It was later discovered that blood found on top of a linked fence at the crime scene had samples taken, and it was discovered the blood had an anti-coalagent called EDTA.

The human body doesn't produce EDTA and EDTA is applied to blood samples to prevent the samples from thickening and to keep a more liquid state. So how did EDTA get into the blood found on the fence? the answer is that blood was planted from the blood vials originally given from OJ.

Now keep this in mind the chain of custody of OJ's white SUV and its security at the police inpoundment was breached and the truck was broken into. Prior to the SUV breakin, LAPD forensic did not find blood DNA in the Bronco, however, after the break in LAPD's forensic lab reinvestigated the Bronco and suddenly their was blood DNA evidence linking OJ, to the murdered victims.

By the time OJ's original vials of blood were booked as evidence, it was discovered that over 2cc's of OJ's blood were missing!

The police were in a position to mix and plant the blood after the killings.

There is no way they could have replaced all that blood at the crime scene from the sample. He did it and even took the time to have book done to talk about how "He would have done it."

[Northman]

I don't think you are going to find a single person on this board that is surprised by that statement.

:rofl:

[ak1971]

I'll get smacked for this, but I don't think OJ did the original "crime". I watched the entire trial and the police misconduct and malfeasance was SO bad (including Mark Fuhrman), that the LAPD contaminated almost every single shred of so called evidence against him. Then, all OJ's memorabilia was pretty much heisted from him in a civil claim that, I feel, was unjustified. He was later enticed to "get his stuff back" from a phone caller who told where OJ's stuff was. OJ said he'd spoken to the holder of his stuff, but something went bad on their alleged agreement. So...

If you watched every microsecond of his original trial, you'd understand why they arrived at their verdict.

One thing I'll agree is that OJ is cocky, self centered and stupid. And, if he did do the original crime, the LAPD planted entirely too much evidence and that is what cast doubt on the crime. Johnny C mopped the floor with the states pr0secution like any good Atty. would've.

You ought to get with Gaffney and write a book about it.

[footstepsfrom#27]

Well now he can get back to looking for the real killers.