PDA

View Full Version : This season's going to fun to watch


phisig150
04-27-2009, 11:38 PM
We've have arguably a top 3 WR tandem in the league with BMarsh, Royal, Stokley, Gaffney (experience in the system), a top receiving tight end, two excellent blocking tight ends, a elite LT, an emerging top RT, decent interior linemen, and now a potential franchise RB in Knowshon. A great versatile weapon in Hillis, and decent RB depth. Adequate to good Qbs who I think one (not sure who yet) will flourish in this system with the overall talent surrounding him. I think we surprise a lot of "experts" and squeak into the playoffs by winning a lot of wild shootouts.

On top of that how do you not love Dawkins and Bailey playing on the same team. Ayers also intrigues me. Don't know about you but I'm excited.

OABB
04-27-2009, 11:42 PM
go broncos!

phisig150
04-27-2009, 11:49 PM
With all the doom and gloom around here I think we forget sports is first and foremost entertainment, and with the players we have on offense it's going to be entertaining year at the very least. We'll win a lot of games 35 to 28 and lose some like too I'm sure. This is going to become the league's next great offensive team (Colts, Rams, Chargers back in the day, etc.) and if all the rule changes are any indication we'll probably play the brand of football Goodall drools over.

TheChamp24
04-28-2009, 12:28 AM
I'm not calling this the next great offensive team until I see if Orton(or Simms) can handle the QB duties.
All those great offensive teams had an exceptional QB.

phisig150
04-28-2009, 12:42 AM
I'm not calling this the next great offensive team until I see if Orton(or Simms) can handle the QB duties.
All those great offensive teams had an exceptional QB.

Fair enough. I do however think Orton may be the guy. Still young. Seems like a team leader or at least a great guy to have in the locker room. Urlacher seemed pretty distraught losing him and that means a lot to me if your mddle linebacker is upset to see him go. Seems tough as nails or at least gutsy enough to play through injuries. Not a great arm but probably better than what Pennington has to work with. Has at least 4 legit play makers around him when he only really had Forte in Chicago. Huge offensive line upgrade. And a great offensive mind that will play to his strengths and mask his flaws. I think we'll see quite a large dropoff for Cutler this year without the recievers and te talent he had here.

lex
04-28-2009, 12:51 AM
Fair enough. I do however think Orton may be the guy. Still young. Seems like a team leader or at least a great guy to have in the locker room. Urlacher seemed pretty distraught losing him and that means a lot to me if your mddle linebacker is upset to see him go. Seems tough as nails or at least gutsy enough to play through injuries. Not a great arm but probably better than what Pennington has to work with. Has at least 4 legit play makers around him when he only really had Forte in Chicago. Huge offensive line upgrade. And a great offensive mind that will play to his strengths and mask his flaws. I think we'll see quite a large dropoff for Cutler this year without the recievers and te talent he had here.

He didnt "have" anything. He played on the same team with Forte...in the same backfield.

phisig150
04-28-2009, 12:54 AM
He didnt "have" anything. He played on the same team with Forte...in the same backfield.

Didn't watch a lot of Bears games. Thought they played together (had). Don't remember many play makers he played with (had). I know he didn't actually own the team.

lex
04-28-2009, 01:18 AM
Didn't watch a lot of Bears games. Thought they played together (had). Don't remember many play makers he played with (had). I know he didn't actually own the team.

The reason I pounced on that is because it feeds into this whole notion that the teams win/loss record is attributable to the QB...almost as if the QB is a boxer. No. A QB is just one piece of a team. There have been plenty of times that mediocre and even bad QBs have won games because the running game and defense did the heavy lifting. The QB doesnt really "have" anything. He's not even calling the plays anymore like the QB used to in the Johnny Unitas days. Its kind of silly to give a QB credit for wins when their biggest contribution is handing off to a running back. And more often than not, the teams that have won SBs were the teams that were better at running the ball and playing defense.

Dexter
04-28-2009, 02:19 AM
The reason I pounced on that is because it feeds into this whole notion that the teams win/loss record is attributable to the QB...almost as if the QB is a boxer. No. A QB is just one piece of a team. There have been plenty of times that mediocre and even bad QBs have won games because the running game and defense did the heavy lifting. The QB doesnt really "have" anything. He's not even calling the plays anymore like the QB used to in the Johnny Unitas days. Its kind of silly to give a QB credit for wins when their biggest contribution is handing off to a running back. And more often than not, the teams that have won SBs were the teams that were better at running the ball and playing defense.

I somewhat agree with what you said but you also can't sell Orton short on what he had to work with around him.

Orton's receivers are average at best, his offensive line was below average, but he did have a good defense, running game and TE's. Orton didn't carry that team, but he did more than just "hand the ball off to Forte".

I also don't believe Chicago's offensive system got the most out of him they could. They won't with Cutler either. Why Cutler is so happy to be in Chicago is surprising. He won't ever amass the numbers in that system that he did here.


Just my 2 cents.

cutthemdown
04-28-2009, 02:34 AM
I'm looking forward to seeing how Mcdaniels changes the Broncos offense and special teams. Looking at some of the draft picks and the udfa signings its clear to me Mcdaniels wants more Dbacks and WR on the special teams.

Broncos coverage has been slow slow slow slow. They need to get down the field quicker and I bet that is what they are focusing on. Most important thing in coverage is to get tacklers around the returner and Broncos just never did that, they came in late one by one every friggin game.

I swear my old HS team got downfield faster then the coverage units we had.

TDmvp
04-28-2009, 02:37 AM
I'm looking forward to seeing how Mcdaniels changes the Broncos offense and special teams. Looking at some of the draft picks and the udfa signings its clear to me Mcdaniels wants more Dbacks and WR on the special teams.

Broncos coverage has been slow slow slow slow. They need to get down the field quicker and I bet that is what they are focusing on. Most important thing in coverage is to get tacklers around the returner and Broncos just never did that, they came in late one by one every friggin game.

I swear my old HS team got downfield faster then the coverage units we had.



I'm a Shanny homer yet I agree our ST has sucked over the last few years as bad as our D did last year .

watermock
04-28-2009, 02:43 AM
McDummy seems intent on making this team unstoppable on offense, I'll give him that.

If Orton can run it.

Remember tho, Shanny did not leave the cupboard bare on offense.

Mock's maybe having an epiphany.

Not yet.

Atwater His Ass
04-28-2009, 02:45 AM
There is nothing special about Orton. Anyone that thinks he can come in here and do half of what Cutler could is smoking crack, plain and simple.

The defense is still what needs to be fixed here. And so far it hasn't been imporved, which is saying something considering how awful it was last season.

watermock
04-28-2009, 02:46 AM
Broncos coverage has been slow slow slow slow. They need to get down the field quicker and I bet that is what they are focusing on. Most important thing in coverage is to get tacklers around the returner and Broncos just never did that, they came in late one by one every friggin game.



He DID draft some gunnners...

HMM...

cutthemdown
04-28-2009, 02:55 AM
He DID draft some gunnners...

HMM...

I've read that the SS from Notre Dame we drafted is known for getting down field on ST and making plays. Woodyard I think can make some plays on ST. Larsen as well. A few more headhunters and maybe we can get back to where I don't piss my pants every time we kick the ****ing ball.

Seriously Mock I know you felt same way. We all did. You just knew a big return was coming it was laughable how bad we have been.

It wasn't really missed tackles as it was the returner being full speed by the time our coverage even got there. You let returners get to full speed you are asking for big trouble.

We need defenders who get down there and make the returner start making moves before he gets flying 100 MPH.

TailgateNut
04-28-2009, 06:39 AM
We've have arguably a top 3 WR tandem in the league with BMarsh, Royal, Stokley, Gaffney (experience in the system), a top receiving tight end, two excellent blocking tight ends, a elite LT, an emerging top RT, decent interior linemen, and now a potential franchise RB in Knowshon. A great versatile weapon in Hillis, and decent RB depth. Adequate to good Qbs who I think one (not sure who yet) will flourish in this system with the overall talent surrounding him. I think we surprise a lot of "experts" and squeak into the playoffs by winning a lot of wild shootouts.

On top of that how do you not love Dawkins and Bailey playing on the same team. Ayers also intrigues me. Don't know about you but I'm excited.


Don't you know that positive posts will get you banned from posting on the 'mane?:wiggle:

barryr
04-28-2009, 06:49 AM
That's been another problem for the Broncos for a long while now. Mediocre special teams, and combine that with a poor defense, has caused the Broncos to lose the battle of field position just about every game the last few years and really even beyond that.

colonelbeef
04-28-2009, 06:49 AM
I'm not calling this the next great offensive team until I see if Orton(or Simms) can handle the QB duties.
All those great offensive teams had an exceptional QB.

Orton and Simms kind of suck and suck, there is nothing exceptional about either of them.

kamakazi_kal
04-28-2009, 07:14 AM
If by offensive "fun" you mean watching Orton dump the ball off to the RB "just short" allot, then yeah it's gonna be fun.

I still can't believe I'm rooting for Simms to be Denver's starting QB.

gyldenlove
04-28-2009, 07:45 AM
I've read that the SS from Notre Dame we drafted is known for getting down field on ST and making plays. Woodyard I think can make some plays on ST. Larsen as well. A few more headhunters and maybe we can get back to where I don't piss my pants every time we kick the ****ing ball.

Seriously Mock I know you felt same way. We all did. You just knew a big return was coming it was laughable how bad we have been.

It wasn't really missed tackles as it was the returner being full speed by the time our coverage even got there. You let returners get to full speed you are asking for big trouble.

We need defenders who get down there and make the returner start making moves before he gets flying 100 MPH.

I want me a lot more Spencer Larsen on ST, if he can lay the lumber like he did against KC we are going to be okay. That kid is a highspeed crash in disguise.

Rohirrim
04-28-2009, 07:49 AM
The offense should be very strong. Hopefully, Ayers can stop the run on his own, because that's what we're asking of him. Judging by Big Alphonso's record, he won't be tackling many RBs. ;D

HAT
04-28-2009, 08:19 AM
There is nothing special about Orton. Anyone that thinks he can come in here and do half of what Cutler could is smoking crack, plain and simple.



Oh, the drama.

So you're saying Orton can't throw for 2300 yards, 13 TD's and win 4 games with an 43.0 QBR.

Riiiigght!

What a tool.

TailgateNut
04-28-2009, 08:34 AM
So you're saying Orton can't throw for 2300 yards, 13 TD's and win 4 games with an 43.0 QBR.

.


Good one!

snowspot66
04-28-2009, 09:08 AM
Oh, the drama.

So you're saying Orton can't throw for 2300 yards, 13 TD's and win 4 games with an 43.0 QBR.

Riiiigght!

What a tool.

Don't you know? Our QB's were borderline candidates for the Special Olympics squad. We're doomed to mediocrity forever and ever!

Good Lord. We consistently got double digit wins with Plummer at the helm when the West was one of the strongest divisions in football and the AFC was the unquestioned power conference. Not only that but we almost made the Super Bowl with the Browncos on our defensive line, Ian Gold roaming the field, and the power packed combo of Mike and Tatum running the ball.

Now the West is at it's weakest in decades and while the AFC is still dominant it's not nearly the extreme difference in talent from earlier in the decade.

And yet people are claiming we are ****ed and doomed to worse than mediocrity because we have Kyle Orton and Chris Simms as our QB's. I don't get it.

STBumpkin
04-28-2009, 09:19 AM
The defense is still what needs to be fixed here. And so far it hasn't been imporved, which is saying something considering how awful it was last season.

You wouldn't call Dawkins and the other new talent we have in the backfield an improvement on last year? How about replacing the failure Slowick with the proven DC Nolan? How about the additions by subtraction like Bly and our old safeties? You are a joke.

TailgateNut
04-28-2009, 09:31 AM
You wouldn't call Dawkins and the other new talent we have in the backfield an improvement on last year? How about replacing the failure Slowick with the proven DC Nolan? How about the additions by subtraction like Bly and our old safeties? You are a joke.

Bly, the "I'll get burned most of the time, but I'll get an interception every blue moon" wonderchild.
He WAS a joke!

Although the Cutler knobslobbers wont agree, I think we've improved our team. We might even be able to score once we reach the red zone, and not just play football between the 20s.

Paladin
04-28-2009, 10:03 AM
The Quitler knobslobbers should just get a beer and cry in it....

"Improve the D". I don't think some people would know when the D had been immproved.

Chris
04-28-2009, 02:00 PM
Actually Smith has been notorious for stopping guys behind the line of scrimmage. He's got the potential to be great at that like champ.

Atwater His Ass
04-29-2009, 02:10 AM
You wouldn't call Dawkins and the other new talent we have in the backfield an improvement on last year? How about replacing the failure Slowick with the proven DC Nolan? How about the additions by subtraction like Bly and our old safeties? You are a joke.

I don't care how good the secondary is. How long has the best CB in football been on our team? What has that accomplished?

DL is what needs to improve. And the personnel we have on this team currently can't get it done.

So basicaly, you like signing a couple of veteran backups in Davis and Fields, signing an aging one dimensional S and changing coaches, but not fixing the DL?

Shanny changed DC's. Shanny brough in John Lynch and several career backups on the DL. Guess what? Didn't get us any closer to a SB win.

Have you been watching Bronco football over the past couple years? ffs man, stop drinking the koolaid for 5 mins, step back, and see what is really going on.

STBumpkin
04-29-2009, 09:05 AM
I don't care how good the secondary is. How long has the best CB in football been on our team? What has that accomplished?

DL is what needs to improve. And the personnel we have on this team currently can't get it done.

So basicaly, you like signing a couple of veteran backups in Davis and Fields, signing an aging one dimensional S and changing coaches, but not fixing the DL?

Shanny changed DC's. Shanny brough in John Lynch and several career backups on the DL. Guess what? Didn't get us any closer to a SB win.

Have you been watching Bronco football over the past couple years? ffs man, stop drinking the koolaid for 5 mins, step back, and see what is really going on.

I never said the D is gonna be great, just that it has been improved. The DL personnel couldn't get it done with slowick, I'm willing to see how they do with someone who knows what they are doing in Nolan.

I have watched the team for the last 5 years, and I seem to remember something about a regime change. This is not the team of the last 5 years. Whether it is better now or not won't be answered until they actually play some ball. Give the new guys a chance.

Gort
04-29-2009, 04:42 PM
On top of that how do you not love Dawkins and Bailey playing on the same team. Ayers also intrigues me. Don't know about you but I'm excited.

http://www.antimotivational.com/pictures/excitement.htm