PDA

View Full Version : Stop Federal Takeover of Food Regulation in H.R. 875


Garcia Bronco
03-20-2009, 08:40 AM
Stop Federal Takeover of Food Regulation in H.R. 875
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 by: Ethan Huff, citizen journalist
See all articles by this author
Email this author

Key concepts: Food, Food safety and Authority


Email this article to a friend Printable Version FREE Email Newsletter

Articles Related to This Article:
• The Honest Food Guide empowers consumers with independent information about foods and health

• Interview with "Kevala" Karen Parker, master raw foods chef

• Cigarettes, Lies, and Pet Food Advertising




Support NaturalNews advertisers - Advertise with NaturalNews

Sign the Health Revolution Petition
Join the call for genuine health freedom in America. End FDA tyranny and Big Pharma corruption. Watch the video and sign the petition here.

(NaturalNews) The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund recently reported the unveiling of the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (H.R. 875) on Feb. 4, 2009, by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), to both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Agriculture. Cosponsored by 36 other Congressmen, all Democrats, H.R. 875 would essentially transfer all state control over food regulation to the Food Safety Administration (FSA), a newly-established federal bureaucracy to be created within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Its implications point to the elimination of all independent, family farms as well as all organic farming operations due to overbearing federal regulations subjectively determined by FSA in favor of corporate factory farms.

Some of the requirements set forth within H.R. 875 include:

- Designating FSA as sole regulator of food safety rather than the individual states, including granting FSA the power to implement and administer a "national system for regular unannounced inspection of food establishments" under its own terms.
- Reclassifying all farms as "food production facilities", ensuring they come under the regulatory and inspection protocols of FSA as well as enforcing compliance with whatever FSA deems as appropriate food safety requirements.
- Requiring farmers to comply with FSA-established "minimum standards" for farming practices, including requiring them to establish Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans and other written documentation as determined and mandated by FSA.
- Granting FSA the power to arrogate "preventative process controls to reduce adulteration of food" as it deems fit.
- Instituting FSA as food safety law enforcement, allowing it to assess civil penalties and fines for violation of any and all FSA safety laws up to $1 million for each violation. Collected fines would become unappropriated slush funds to be used however FSA deems fit in order to "carry out enforcement activities under the food safety law".

While many of these provisions may appear benign due to language emphasizing safety and to standardized regulations, the implications are far more mischievous. While stripping states of what little tenth amendment powers remain, H.R. 875 would establish a central regulatory body with even more unaccountable authority than that of the FDA. Similar to the provisions contained in the Obama "stimulus" package and the Bush "bailout" before it, H.R. 875 would bolster the ever-burgeoning federal empire in eliminating state sovereignty and individual freedom, particularly in relation to food.

The legality of any type of raw milk distribution across the country is also in jeopardy as H.R. 875 would grant FSA the statutory authority to impose a ban on its sale and distribution, period. If, for example, FSA determines that pasteurization is a necessary "preventative process" for safe milk production, it could override any current state provisions permitting intrastate raw milk sales, an area where even the overbearing FDA does not have legitimate jurisdiction. This limit would not apply to FSA, however, which would be granted unlimited jurisdictional power over all decisions concerning food safety, despite the unconstitutionality of such authority.

Additionally, the bill contains language that would expand the definition of the word "contaminant" for purposes of widening the scope of what constitutes "adulterated food". In other words, the vague, open-ended language would grant seemingly unlimited authority to FSA to arbitrarily levy fines whenever and to whomever it deems fit for breaching its subjective food safety rules.

The full text of H.R. 875 can be found here as well as committee contacts and a listing of the bill`s cosponsors. It is important to keep in mind that Rep. DeLauro`s husband, Stanley Greenburg, works for biotechnology giant Monsanto, the multi-national corporation responsible for the creation of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) in cows, the perpetuation of "Round-Up Ready" sugar and soy products hidden in conventional foods, and the instigation of lawsuits against farmers whose fields were contaminated by Monsanto`s patented seeds. H.R. 875 provides the means by which corporations like Monsanto can seize control of the last-remaining independent farming operations in the United States.

H.R. 875 is still being reviewed by the committees with no official date set for a vote. Now is the time to contact both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Agriculture to express opposition to this federal takeover of the food supply. Also, be sure to contact your representatives to express opposition as well.

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people." -Henry Kissinger, 1970


http://www.naturalnews.com/025824.html

Smiling Assassin27
03-20-2009, 10:25 AM
seems like a one size fits all attempt...naturally, the little guys will get unduly burdened if Congress has its way.

Garcia Bronco
03-20-2009, 10:28 AM
seems like a one size fits all attempt...naturally, the little guys will get unduly burdened if Congress has its way.

IMO it's completely ridiculous.

Smiling Assassin27
03-20-2009, 10:38 AM
IMO it's completely ridiculous.

turning the States into a Federally subsidized food police seems a bit overblown and costly.

in the grand scheme, the Monsantos of the world should make out well, when all the small guys fold up their farms and go home due to the high cost of compliance.

watermock
03-20-2009, 03:08 PM
They want to put RFID chips in all farm animals to track them too.

And buying ammo is going to get tracked and dated.

Smiling Assassin27
03-20-2009, 03:41 PM
on who's dime?

Bronco_Beerslug
03-20-2009, 04:45 PM
So letting the food companies hire their own inspectors (which is the standard now) is the right way to regulate food in this country?

Spider
03-20-2009, 05:18 PM
LOl Garcia , you are so full of **** ........ Tell you what genius , pack your ass down to meat packing plant ...........Then come back and repost this same bull****

Bronco Bob
03-20-2009, 08:00 PM
So, Garcia, tell us how well lax regulation of peanuts worked out.

Garcia Bronco
03-23-2009, 06:56 AM
So, Garcia, tell us how well lax regulation of peanuts worked out.

That didn't happen at the peanut farms, it happened where they were packed. What this bill does is make small farms cost prohibitive. That's the problem. Of course none of you, except maybe Spider, understands government compliance and the cost.

Spider
03-23-2009, 07:40 AM
That didn't happen at the peanut farms, it happened where they were packed. What this bill does is make small farms cost prohibitive. That's the problem. Of course none of you, except maybe Spider, understands government compliance and the cost.
But more important is the cost of not complying , look Dealing with the government is a pain in the ass , I know I deal with them on a daily basis , some of their rule are pure bull**** , but some are damn important , take a look at my new thread up top called if you see this on the interstate ....... when yo ugot something like that rollin down the road , you dont want anyone taking shortcuts .......... Yeah the gubermint is a pain the ass , but trust me , yo uwant em

Bronco Bob
03-23-2009, 05:42 PM
That didn't happen at the peanut farms, it happened where they were packed. What this bill does is make small farms cost prohibitive. That's the problem. Of course none of you, except maybe Spider, understands government compliance and the cost.

Okay then, tell us how lax regulations on lettuce and spinach farms worked out.
Having to go to the hospital for Salmonella poisoning tends to get rather expensive too.
Not to mention the cost of a funeral if you don't make it.

Bronco_Beerslug
03-23-2009, 07:38 PM
That didn't happen at the peanut farms, it happened where they were packed. What this bill does is make small farms cost prohibitive. That's the problem. Of course none of you, except maybe Spider, understands government compliance and the cost.And what's the cost of food companies regulating themselves without government oversight?

kappys
03-23-2009, 11:43 PM
Its ultimately a catch - 22. Lax regulation will lead to health outbreaks but as others have pointed out excess government egulation often makes it impossible for small farms and farmer's markets to survive.

Bronco Bob
03-24-2009, 10:03 PM
Its ultimately a catch - 22. Lax regulation will lead to health outbreaks but as others have pointed out excess government egulation often makes it impossible for small farms and farmer's markets to survive.

If a farm can't produce food that can be proven to be safe to eat, it ought not be sold to the public anyway.
I see nothing in this that is going to put legitimate, safely run farms out of business.
Just more libertarian scare none sense. "Ohhh! The Government! Run!"

kappys
03-25-2009, 11:41 AM
If a farm can't produce food that can be proven to be safe to eat, it ought not be sold to the public anyway.
I see nothing in this that is going to put legitimate, safely run farms out of business.
Just more libertarian scare none sense. "Ohhh! The Government! Run!"

How safe do you want everything? How much testing needs to be done before something is considered safe?

Without considering some of the intricacies involved it is easy to make blanket statements like this. Unfortunately that isn't the real world. In fact I would say it is a rather reactionary stance towards recent events. However much you test you can never ensure everything is 100% safe, but the more testing you require and perform the closer you can get to that number. Nevertheless, at some point it much be considered cost prohibitive/

mosca
03-25-2009, 03:51 PM
I like how Clint Eastwood put it:

"You can't stop everything from happening. But we've gotten to a point where we're certainly trying. If a car doesn't have four hundred air bags in it, then it's no good."

Bob
03-26-2009, 07:40 PM
Stop Federal Takeover of Food Regulation in H.R. 875
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 by: Ethan Huff, citizen journalist
See all articles by this author
Email this author

Key concepts: Food, Food safety and Authority


Email this article to a friend Printable Version FREE Email Newsletter

Articles Related to This Article:
• The Honest Food Guide empowers consumers with independent information about foods and health

• Interview with "Kevala" Karen Parker, master raw foods chef

• Cigarettes, Lies, and Pet Food Advertising




Support NaturalNews advertisers - Advertise with NaturalNews

Sign the Health Revolution Petition
Join the call for genuine health freedom in America. End FDA tyranny and Big Pharma corruption. Watch the video and sign the petition here.

(NaturalNews) The Farm-to-Consumer Legal Defense Fund recently reported the unveiling of the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2009 (H.R. 875) on Feb. 4, 2009, by Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-CT), to both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Agriculture. Cosponsored by 36 other Congressmen, all Democrats, H.R. 875 would essentially transfer all state control over food regulation to the Food Safety Administration (FSA), a newly-established federal bureaucracy to be created within the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). Its implications point to the elimination of all independent, family farms as well as all organic farming operations due to overbearing federal regulations subjectively determined by FSA in favor of corporate factory farms.

Some of the requirements set forth within H.R. 875 include:

- Designating FSA as sole regulator of food safety rather than the individual states, including granting FSA the power to implement and administer a "national system for regular unannounced inspection of food establishments" under its own terms.
- Reclassifying all farms as "food production facilities", ensuring they come under the regulatory and inspection protocols of FSA as well as enforcing compliance with whatever FSA deems as appropriate food safety requirements.
- Requiring farmers to comply with FSA-established "minimum standards" for farming practices, including requiring them to establish Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans and other written documentation as determined and mandated by FSA.
- Granting FSA the power to arrogate "preventative process controls to reduce adulteration of food" as it deems fit.
- Instituting FSA as food safety law enforcement, allowing it to assess civil penalties and fines for violation of any and all FSA safety laws up to $1 million for each violation. Collected fines would become unappropriated slush funds to be used however FSA deems fit in order to "carry out enforcement activities under the food safety law".

While many of these provisions may appear benign due to language emphasizing safety and to standardized regulations, the implications are far more mischievous. While stripping states of what little tenth amendment powers remain, H.R. 875 would establish a central regulatory body with even more unaccountable authority than that of the FDA. Similar to the provisions contained in the Obama "stimulus" package and the Bush "bailout" before it, H.R. 875 would bolster the ever-burgeoning federal empire in eliminating state sovereignty and individual freedom, particularly in relation to food.

The legality of any type of raw milk distribution across the country is also in jeopardy as H.R. 875 would grant FSA the statutory authority to impose a ban on its sale and distribution, period. If, for example, FSA determines that pasteurization is a necessary "preventative process" for safe milk production, it could override any current state provisions permitting intrastate raw milk sales, an area where even the overbearing FDA does not have legitimate jurisdiction. This limit would not apply to FSA, however, which would be granted unlimited jurisdictional power over all decisions concerning food safety, despite the unconstitutionality of such authority.

Additionally, the bill contains language that would expand the definition of the word "contaminant" for purposes of widening the scope of what constitutes "adulterated food". In other words, the vague, open-ended language would grant seemingly unlimited authority to FSA to arbitrarily levy fines whenever and to whomever it deems fit for breaching its subjective food safety rules.

The full text of H.R. 875 can be found here as well as committee contacts and a listing of the bill`s cosponsors. It is important to keep in mind that Rep. DeLauro`s husband, Stanley Greenburg, works for biotechnology giant Monsanto, the multi-national corporation responsible for the creation of recombinant bovine growth hormone (rBGH) in cows, the perpetuation of "Round-Up Ready" sugar and soy products hidden in conventional foods, and the instigation of lawsuits against farmers whose fields were contaminated by Monsanto`s patented seeds. H.R. 875 provides the means by which corporations like Monsanto can seize control of the last-remaining independent farming operations in the United States.

H.R. 875 is still being reviewed by the committees with no official date set for a vote. Now is the time to contact both the House Committee on Energy and Commerce and the House Committee on Agriculture to express opposition to this federal takeover of the food supply. Also, be sure to contact your representatives to express opposition as well.

"Control oil and you control nations; control food and you control the people." -Henry Kissinger, 1970


http://www.naturalnews.com/025824.html

Oh, dont worry, the government NEVER abuses power we lend them...

Why is it that almost every single act, seems to be designed to make us less able to take care of ourselves? Hmmm.... I wonder....and I cant quite figure out why Charitable giving would be discouraged as well....

Big Brother = taking names, and making slaves.