PDA

View Full Version : Fed buys another 750 billion in toxic debt


watermock
03-19-2009, 01:25 AM
And where are they getting this junk?

FROM THE SAME BANKS THAT WE HAVE ALLREADY RESCUED!

Remember, the "fed" is a private catel of banks, including, Citi, B of A, Sachs, Merril and USB.

Naturally, FINANCIALS WENT UP AS MUCH AS 25% YESTERDAY.


Fed launches bold $1.2T effort to revive economy.
AP – In this March 3, 2009 file photo, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke testifies on Capitol Hill in … WASHINGTON – With the country sinking deeper into recession, the Federal Reserve launched a bold $1.2 trillion effort Wednesday to lower rates on mortgages and other consumer debt, spur spending and revive the economy. To do so, the Fed will spend up to $300 billion to buy long-term government bonds and an additional $750 billion in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke and his colleagues wrapped a two-day meeting by leaving a key short-term bank lending rate at a record low of between zero and 0.25 percent. Economists predict the Fed will hold the rate in that zone for the rest of this year and for most — if not all — of next year.

The decision to hold rates near zero was widely expected. But the Fed's plan to buy government bonds and the sheer amount — $1.2 trillion — of the extra money to be pumped into the U.S. economy was a surprise.

"The Fed is clearly ready, willing and able to be the ATM for the credit markets," said Terry Connelly, dean of Golden Gate University's Ageno School of Business in San Francisco.

Wall Street was buoyed. The Dow Jones industrial average, which had been down earlier in the day, rose 90.88, or 1.2 percent, to 7,486.58. Broader indicators also gained.

And government bond prices soared. Heralding a coming drop in mortgage rates, the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note dropped to 2.50 percent from 3.01 percent — the biggest daily drop in percentage points since 1981.

The dollar, meanwhile, fell against other major currencies. In part, that signaled concern that the Fed's intervention might spur inflation over the long run.

If the credit and financial markets can be stabilized, the recession could end this year, setting the stage for a recovery next year, Bernanke has said in recent weeks. The Fed chief and his colleagues again pledged to use all available tools to make that happen, and economists expect further steps in the months ahead.

Since the Fed last met in late January, "the economy continues to contract," Fed policymakers observed in a statement they issued Wednesday.

"Job losses, declining equity and housing wealth and tight credit conditions have weighed on consumer sentiment and spending," they said.

The Fed's announcement that it will spend up to $300 billion over the next six months to buy long-term government bonds was something that in January it had hinted it would do. But some officials had seemed to back off from the idea in recent weeks.

Such action is designed to boost Treasury prices and drive down their rates, as it did Wednesday. Rates on other kinds of debt are likely to fall as well.

"This is going to help everybody," said Sung Won Sohn, economist at the Martin Smith School of Business at California State University. "This might help the Fed put Humpty Dumpty back together again."

The last time the Fed set out to influence long-term interest rates was during the 1960s.

The Fed's decision to buy an additional $750 billion in mortgage-backed securities guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie comes on top of $500 billion in such securities it's already buying. It also will double its purchases of Fannie and Freddie debt to $200 billion.

Since the initial Fannie-Freddie program was announced late last year, mortgage rates have fallen. Rates on 30-year mortgages now average 5.03 percent, down from 6.13 percent a year ago, according to Freddie Mac. The Fed's decision to expand the program could further reduce rates, analysts said.

"This is not only going to keep mortgage rates low for a long period of time," said Greg McBride, a senior financial analyst at Bankrate.com. "The mere announcement may produce a honeymoon effect and bring mortgage rates down to even lower levels in the coming days."

The goal behind all the Fed's moves is to spur lending. More lending would boost spending by consumers and businesses, which would revive the economy.

The Fed also said it would consider expanding another $1 trillion program that's being rolled out this week. That program aims to boost the availability of consumer loans for autos, education and credit cards, as well as for small businesses.

Where does the Fed get all the money? It prints it.

The Fed's series of radical programs to lend or buy debt has swollen its balance sheet to nearly $2 trillion — from just under $900 billion in September. Sohn believes the Fed's balance sheet could grow to $5 trillion over the next two years.

The Fed has said it's mindful of the risks of pumping more money into the economy, bailing out financial institutions and leaving a key rate near zero for too long. There's the potential to plant the seeds for higher inflation, put ever-more taxpayer money at risk and encourage "moral hazard." That's when companies make high-stakes gambles knowing the government stands ready to rescue them.

Across the Atlantic, the Bank of England last week began buying government bonds from financial institutions as it turned to new ways to help revive Britain's moribund economy. The Bank of England, like the Fed, already had lowered its key interest rate to a record low of 0.5 percent.

Finance leaders from top economies have discussed coordinating actions from their governments and central banks to provide a more potent punch against the global financial crisis.

The Fed is taking the new steps as the U.S. economy sinks deeper into recession. Businesses are facing weaker sales prospects as customers in the United States and abroad cut back, the policymakers said.

Still, the Fed said it hoped its actions, the government's bank rescue effort and President Barack Obama's $787 billion stimulus of increased government spending and tax cuts eventually will help revive the economy.

"Although the near-term economic outlook is weak, the committee anticipates that policy actions .... will contribute to a gradual resumption of sustainable economic growth," the Fed said.

But even in this best-case scenario, the nation's unemployment rate — now at quarter-century peak of 8.1 percent — will keep climbing. Some economists think it will hit 10 percent by the end of this year.

The recession, which began in December 2007, already has snatched a net total of 4.4 million jobs and has left 12.5 million searching for work.

watermock
03-19-2009, 01:37 AM
We are witnessing the biggest heist in history.

All these companies are shoveling their bad decisions on the American taxpayer.

watermock
03-19-2009, 03:11 AM
-- The Huffington Post (liberal) -- Sen. Wyden says effort to block bonuses was killed in Congress: "Senator Ron Wyden said on Tuesday that the furor surrounding AIG's bonus payments could have been avoided had the Obama White House and members of Congress simply backed legislation that he and Sen. Olympia Snowe introduced more than a month ago. In an interview with the Huffington Post, the Oregon Democrat noted that during the crafting of the stimulus package, he and his Republican colleague from Maine introduced a provision that would have forced bailout recipients to cap their bonuses at $100,000. Any amount paid above that would have been taxed at 35%. The language made it through the Senate, but during conference committee with the House, it was inexplicably removed."

............

rastaman
03-19-2009, 03:43 AM
The full measure of our nation’s plight was revealed in Hillary Clinton’s first trip as Secretary of State. It was to China, to beg them to fund Obama’s new fiscal deficits. Without loans from China, the U.S. economy cannot be revived. The significance of this cannot be overstated: the U.S. no longer exercises sovereignty over its own economic affairs. That sovereignty now resides in the hands of China, the U.S.’s greatest long-term rival.

Thanks to Republican policies of massive debt and shipping jobs abroad, the U.S. has technically become a colony of China. It exports raw materials and imports finished goods, together with the capital to make up the difference. Should the Chinese decide not to lend the trillions of dollars the U.S. is begging for, the U.S. economy will implode, plummeting onto itself in a World Trade Center-like collapse that will leave dust clouds circling the planet for decades.

Notwithstanding the destruction inflicted on the economy by Republican policies, the most devastating breakdown is in the intellectual foundation on which right wing economic ideology itself is premised. Free market doctrine, the secular religion of right-wing America, is in utter, irretrievable shambles.

One of the most lofty tenets on which free markets are premised is their claim for themselves that they are “efficient,” that is, that market prices always reflect “fundamental values” of assets. But if that’s true, how could the world’s largest insurance company, AIG, have lost 99.5% of its market value in only 18 months? How could the world’s largest bank, Citibank, have lost 98% of its value over the same period?

How could the world’s largest brokerage company, Merrill Lynch, have gone bankrupt and need to be bought by Bank of America? How could the world’s largest car company, General Motors, have lost 95% of its value and stand on the threshold of extinction? How could the world’s largest industrial conglomerate, General Electric, have lost 85% of its value in only 18 months?

If the largest companies in the world, those at the very heart of the capitalist system itself, can lose virtually all of their value in only 18 months, what is the possible meaning of the phrases “efficient markets” and “fundamental value”? Yes, the Free Market and Capitalism has been a total failure and has economically and financially destabilized the entire WORLD.

watermock
03-19-2009, 04:09 AM
Dodd just admitted he removed the AIG bonus reprisals.

Dayum.

watermock
03-19-2009, 04:17 AM
Libby isn't to blame.

You have no clue.

cutthemdown
03-19-2009, 05:03 AM
If America can do this without the dollar plunging, or inflation getting out of control, then Obama pulls it off. Because the world so dependent on the USA they are sort of forced to finance our debt.

When the dollar plunges or we get really bad inflation, then start to worry.

watermock
03-19-2009, 05:12 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg/225px-Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg

Dodd fesses up. per CNN.

I believe he was also the leading recipient of AIG contributions.

Bob
03-19-2009, 11:23 AM
If America can do this without the dollar plunging, or inflation getting out of control, then Obama pulls it off. Because the world so dependent on the USA they are sort of forced to finance our debt.

When the dollar plunges or we get really bad inflation, then start to worry.

If you think that things are bad in America, they are much worse elsewhere in the world. China has to grow their economy at something like 8% every year, to create enough jobs to keep their huge rural population pacified -- as we are now saving at about 5%, the Chinese are feeling the pinch as well.

Our barrowing is an economic game of hot potato, and like other recent schemes, when it unravels, the only cure is for the system to reset through natural forces. Putting off the winter that will come, is as stupid as spending all of our resources and energy in fall to save all those poor leaves that are falling off the trees.

Bob
03-19-2009, 11:25 AM
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/42/Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg/225px-Christopher_Dodd_official_portrait_2-cropped.jpg

Dodd fesses up. per CNN.

I believe he was also the leading recipient of AIG contributions.

I am not a fan of AIG, but those like Dodd, and Frank who act so enraged at companies -- that they were in bed with, is at best hypocritical, and at worst is criminal.

cutthemdown
03-19-2009, 12:26 PM
Well Obama is going too far. The dollar is plunging and if it keeps going we will get inflation, carter style, and it will be a long 4 yrs with no recovery for Obama, and then a ticket back to Chicago.

http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSN1948188420090319

Bob
03-19-2009, 07:54 PM
Well Obama is going too far. The dollar is plunging and if it keeps going we will get inflation, carter style, and it will be a long 4 yrs with no recovery for Obama, and then a ticket back to Chicago.

http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSN1948188420090319

Question is how much inflation? I am VERY close to pulling all or 1/2 of my money out of the stock market -- damn the tax penalities. I feel horrible, for not finding any reason to believe that the dollar will not crash, but with each passing day, and each decision, they are intentionally attempting to create inflation,believing that they can time this just right. The economy is too big, to turn on a dime, and would be surprised if anyone can time it. The masses will loss everything, and not realize it, until a few days after the fact. The only way out is take the depression now, without attempting to bypass the natural consquences of years of moronic and unethical over-spending.

Seamus
03-19-2009, 10:23 PM
Hey it only gets better!

What has your federal/state/local government done since they see revenue loss from less spending? All of a sudden less money coming in, we need to raise taxes! Yep you little people who we are trying to keep in a house (so you can pay property taxes) need to belly up and start paying for this bad debt.

California Gubonator can't wait for Obama's next move into health care. Just think of how he can trim the budget by kicking all the state employee's coverage to the government. This will trickle down to the counties and local cities where most of these guys are getting pretty darn good coverage.

watermock
03-19-2009, 10:53 PM
Cali's pension plans are just astronomical for govt workers like firemen and teachers.