PDA

View Full Version : T.O. With Denver or Against Them Twice A Year?


sportsaddict
03-05-2009, 11:38 AM
I know that there has been talk about Denver being one of the very few possible places that T.O. could land, but if he doesn't land in Denver he could be playing with the Raiders. That means playing the Broncos twice a year. Javon Walker just restructured his contract to free up a lot of space. Anything's possible.

http://jocklife.com/blog/javon-walker-takes-pay-cut-stays-raiders-15094

DomCasual
03-05-2009, 11:47 AM
Can we ban this dumbass already?

So, douchebag - I just did a quick search ("I was surfing the web...") for your username and the term "jocklife." Here are a few gems that I found, silly spammer:

On Allbuffs.com:
I was surfing the web, and I came across an interview on Jocklife.com about Kordell Stewart and his thoughts about coming out of retirement! If you're a true CU Buffs fan, you will check it out. Jock*******

On Dawgsbynature.com (a Browns SB Board):
For all you wondering just how Eric Wright managed to caugh up the ball after his int last sunday i came across a good blog where he talks about it. He also talks about the win and the upcoming bye week. It is very well written. Apparently he took the wrong path after the int and could of had a TD if just ran along the sideline. Check it out for yourself

On Yardbarker.com, in a thread about the Celtics:
I found a pretty good story on Rondo. He talks about what its like playing with the big three and how they are going to remain at the top. Check it out if you want at http://www.jock*********

On IndyBlue.com (a Colts board):
I was surfing the web, and I came across rookie, Mike Hart's blog on Jock*********. I learned a lot about the rookie! He seems like a cool guy!

On Steelerslive.com:
Gotta check out this Jerome Bettis Movie. If you are a true fan you will like it. check it at out at jock****
and in another thread:
I was surfing the web, and I came across an interview with Kordell Stewart on Jocklife.com. He talks about coming out of retirement! It's awesome! If you're a true Steelers fan, you must check it out. Check it out at Jock*****!

Jens1893
03-05-2009, 11:50 AM
Dom, you should have pursued a career in espionage.

vancejohnson82
03-05-2009, 11:51 AM
Can we ban this dumbass already?

So, douchebag - I just did a quick search ("I was surfing the web...") for your username and the term "jocklife." Here are a few gems that I found, silly spammer:

On Allbuffs.com:


On Dawgsbynature.com (a Browns SB Board):


On Yardbarker.com, in a thread about the Celtics:


On IndyBlue.com (a Colts board):


On Steelerslive.com:

and in another thread:

haha :strong:

DomCasual
03-05-2009, 11:51 AM
Dom, you should have pursued a career in espionage.

And risk running into Oleg in a dark alley? I think not!

worm
03-05-2009, 11:51 AM
Well he is very industrious (while being less than forthright). Plus there is content at the link...not a lame ass rick roll.

OBF1
03-05-2009, 12:00 PM
This message is hidden because sportsaddict is on your ignore list.

montrose
03-05-2009, 12:03 PM
I wouldn't be opposed to offering him a 1-year, minimum salary contract with the notice that one slip up and he's gone. He could help fill in until Marshall returns from suspension although I'd prefer Marvin for that role.

GSRelyea
03-05-2009, 12:08 PM
http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/features/rumors

Thursday, March 5
Where to, T.O.?
Terrell Owens | Cowboys | Interested: Redskins? Raiders? Jets? Giants? Broncos?
Now that the rumors have become official, and Terrell Owens has been cut by the Dallas Cowboys, the guessing game begins as to where he will continue his NFL career.
ESPN's John Clayton has speculated that the Oakland Raiders might be a potential destination, given Al Davis' penchant for big-play wide receivers. A Raiders' No. 81 jersey might become a hot item on the apparel market, but a move to Oakland doesn't really make sense for T.O., who is still seeking that elusive Super Bowl ring. The Raiders are clearly not "one player away" from a championship-caliber squad, and in spite of his devotion to physical fitness Owens is on the far side of his career, and may not have many seasons left to hunt the Lombardi trophy.

With that in mind, several receiver-needy teams emerge as possible candidates. The Washington Redskins do possess a 1,000-yard receiver in Santana Moss, but Moss had a tendency to disappear at times during 2008 and would likely be better-suited to a No. 2 role. Owner Dan Snyder has relentlessly proven that he loves chasing big-name veterans, and really the only issue would be finding some more cash to lay at the feet of Owens given the monstrous contracts already dished out to Albert Haynesworth and DeAngelo Hall this offseason. It's hard to fathom the potential for entertaining post-game press conferences with Owens and one of Clinton Portis' many alter-egos, and Youtube viewers eagerly await such a circumstance. Unfortunately, it would appear now that the Redskins are out of the running, as ESPN's Chris Mortensen says that a team source has told him "No way" in regards to the team signing Owens.

Another likely suitor is the Denver Broncos. New Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels has experience in integrating a "problem" wide receiver into a cohesive offensive unit based on his time with Randy Moss and the New England Patriots. The Broncos may themselves have a problem on their hands with No. 1 wideout Brandon Marshall's off-field drama and the subsequent hearings that are bound to take place with the league, so T.O. could very well be the team's new No. 1 by the season opener.
This leaves the largest media market in the country, and one could argue a case for Owens reaching a deal with either the New York Giants or New York Jets. The Jets will lack a true No. 1 wideout if they don't make another move before the start of 2009, as the team elected not to re-sign Laveranues Coles, and Jerricho Cotchery is not up to that role. On the other hand, the team may focus on developing the rushing attack, given that there is as yet no proven quarterback on the roster, and Thomas Jones showed he still has quite a bit left in the tank after his 1,312-yard, 13-touchdown season in 2008. Additionally, ESPN Radio 1050's Andrew Marchand has reported that a source with knowledge of the Jets' thinking indicates that the team will not pursue Owens.

With the Plaxico Burress situation still up in the air, the Giants also lack a true No. 1 wideout, a fact that is plain to even the most casual observer of the team and perhaps a reason that the team withered away in the playoffs. While Owens would certainly provide more fodder for local sportswriters with his comments than the less overt Burress, he could fill a similar role on the field and has proven an ability to keep his nose clean off of it. However, Newsday and the Newark Star-Ledger have sources who have claimed the Giants will not go after Owens.

For all of the press Owens does generate, he's never had serious off-field issues like so many of his peers in the NFL. The controversy that Owens tends to spark falls fundamentally within the realm of wanting more passes thrown his way, which some would argue is just an indication of his competitive fire. Fans and media members don't seem to mind when a dominant basketball player demands the ball in crunch-time, and Owens is certainly still one of the league's dominant offensive players. Owens finished 2008 averaging 15.2 yards per catch, a figure that ranked seventh amongst receivers with 1,000 yards or more. No matter which team decides to take a shot on T.O., he will certainly be a difference-maker in 2009.

Rulon Velvet Jones
03-05-2009, 12:12 PM
Why aren't the Chargers being mentioned? I think it would be a good fit, unless there's something glaring I'm missing.

supermanhr9
03-05-2009, 12:18 PM
Burned!!!!!!!!!

BroncoDoug
03-05-2009, 12:21 PM
with what money are we going to be able so sign him with:?

HILife
03-05-2009, 12:26 PM
I know that there has been talk about Denver being one of the very few possible places that T.O. could land, but if he doesn't land in Denver he could be playing with the Raiders. That means playing the Broncos twice a year. Javon Walker just restructured his contract to free up a lot of space. Anything's possible.

http://jocklife.com/blog/javon-walker-takes-pay-cut-stays-raiders-15094

That's fine with me. Our superstar defense will be able to hold it down.:rofl: :rofl:

Bronx33
03-05-2009, 12:29 PM
Oakland Raiders might be a potential destination


perfect!!

Old Dude
03-05-2009, 12:31 PM
This is almost too disgusting to post, but here are the Vegas odds on where TO goes next:

1:2 Raiders
.... "The Field" (including "does not play")
4:1 Redskins
5:1 Broncos
6:1 Jets

Followed by Patriots, Rams, Browns & Giants (and the Giants just said they had "zero" interest.")

Bronx33
03-05-2009, 12:31 PM
Why aren't the Chargers being mentioned? I think it would be a good fit, unless there's something glaring I'm missing.

The chargers already have 2 douchebags TO would put em over the top as far as douchebags are concerned.

ZONA
03-05-2009, 12:32 PM
Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.


Quite possibly the most selfish player to have ever played in the NFL. Absolutely NO THANK YOU.

epicSocialism4tw
03-05-2009, 12:36 PM
Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.


Quite possibly the most selfish player to have ever played in the NFL. Absolutely NO THANK YOU.

Dont make fun of his quarterback!

That's his quarterback!

FantomForce
03-05-2009, 12:38 PM
Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.

Hell No
Screw T.O.


Quite possibly the most selfish player to have ever played in the NFL. Absolutely NO THANK YOU.

Thank you Zona!

Bronx33
03-05-2009, 12:43 PM
I would rather have fish hooks inserted in my ball sack than have TO on this team.

Old Dude
03-05-2009, 12:46 PM
I'm surprised Kansas City hasn't come up in the discussions....

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=50691

Then again, maybe I'm not surprised.

Bronx33
03-05-2009, 12:47 PM
I'm surprised Kansas City hasn't come up in the discussions....

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=50691

Then again, maybe I'm not surprised.


Any team without a legit QB is probably not on TOs list.

Old Dude
03-05-2009, 12:55 PM
But does he get to make the lists anymore?

Bronx33
03-05-2009, 12:59 PM
But does he get to make the lists anymore?

Well any team with a marginal QB is wasting their money on TO really whbat's the point of getting him if your QB can't get him the ball ( just ask randy moss) and his time in oakland.

Peoples Champ
03-05-2009, 01:01 PM
Against him, Champ shut down Randy Moss in Oakland, he will do the same with TO.

And nobody post TO burning champ from the eagles. Champ was on a torn hamstring and Broncos were up 20 points.

broncofan2438
03-05-2009, 01:08 PM
Will never happen with us....with Oakland ......yes

worm
03-05-2009, 01:11 PM
Oakland was burnt by Moss already.

They aren't that dumb.....

Wait a minute.

Popps
03-05-2009, 01:12 PM
It just wouldn't be an off-season without this.

Requiem
03-05-2009, 01:14 PM
That is right Popps, it wouldn't.

epicSocialism4tw
03-05-2009, 01:19 PM
It just wouldn't be an off-season without this.

I dont know...Bretta Favre hasnt come up at all. Still waiting for that one.

mr007
03-05-2009, 01:22 PM
Well any team with a marginal QB is wasting their money on TO really whbat's the point of getting him if your QB can't get him the ball ( just ask randy moss) and his time in oakland.

I am having a real hard time reading anything you write with those freakin' tigo's next to whatever it is you post. A coworker just asked me to stand and up and come to a meeting and I didn't think it was such a good idea....

DHallblows
03-05-2009, 01:44 PM
Any team without a legit QB is probably not on TOs list.

Won't lie...that'd eliminate the Redskins and Raiders...

Old Dude
03-05-2009, 02:13 PM
According to yahoo, teams who have executives who have officially said NO to TO include:

Dallas Cowboys.
New York Giants.
Washington Redskins.
Baltimore Ravens.
San Francisco 49ers.
Minnesota Vikings.
Atlanta Falcons.
Cleveland Browns.

with Philadelphia expected to join the list shortly.

TheDave
03-05-2009, 02:26 PM
Damnit... I missed another list.

bombay
03-05-2009, 02:39 PM
against

Popps
03-05-2009, 02:42 PM
According to yahoo, teams who have executives who have officially said NO to TO include:

Dallas Cowboys.
New York Giants.
Washington Redskins.
Baltimore Ravens.
San Francisco 49ers.
Minnesota Vikings.
Atlanta Falcons.
Cleveland Browns.

with Philadelphia expected to join the list shortly.

He has to end up a Raider. The more I think about it, the more sense it makes.

HemiEd
03-05-2009, 02:46 PM
Please, Please sign him to the Broncos.

Rulon Velvet Jones
03-05-2009, 03:07 PM
I'm surprised Kansas City hasn't come up in the discussions....

http://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=50691

Then again, maybe I'm not surprised.

He and Todd Haley aren't exactly the best of friends.

Los Broncos
03-05-2009, 03:15 PM
I'd rather face him, he can tear a team apart from within.

Bronco_Beerslug
03-05-2009, 05:44 PM
Let's see, TO or some idiot that beats up his girlfriends in front of the police............................................ .............tough one!

oubronco
03-05-2009, 05:48 PM
It just wouldn't be an off-season without this.

don't forget we still have the upcoming Favre soap opera

cutthemdown
03-05-2009, 05:48 PM
The only team that could control Owens for a yr or 2 will be really good offenses, really good teams, with a really strong coach and strong veteran leadership. Make a list of those teams and his landing spot will probably be among them.

Not even Al Davis silly enough to try it. IMO Mcdaniels would see that as too big a fish to handle. KC IMO would be scared of him because they also are young and the coach not settled in.

Honestly the Pats could probably tame him, and it's just like them to do something like that.

azbroncfan
03-05-2009, 05:49 PM
What would NE trading for Moss have to do with Denver's interest in TO?

oubronco
03-05-2009, 06:09 PM
somebody will make it rain on TO

lazarus4444
03-05-2009, 06:19 PM
I know the guy is a selfish a-hole but damn he brings it on the field every Sunday. His 'bad' season last year is something most WR would kill for. At this point i'd rather have TO than Brandon "The Idiot" Marshall who will probably get suspended for lying to the commish straight to his face.

I'm more interested in winning and TO would help the Broncos win while BM is not helping the Broncos win. Maybe BM can take some pointers from TO about conducting his life off the field.

cutthemdown
03-05-2009, 07:17 PM
You can't say TO isn't a hard worker, or that he gets in trouble with law. All his problems seem to come from turning on his QB, other players, and coaches. I don't think Cutler is up to taking on TO, nor is Mcdaniels. I would rather draft couple WR and stay young at that spot.

Old Dude
03-06-2009, 03:42 AM
According to yahoo, teams who have executives who have officially said NO to TO include:

Dallas Cowboys.
New York Giants.
Washington Redskins.
Baltimore Ravens.
San Francisco 49ers.
Minnesota Vikings.
Atlanta Falcons.
Cleveland Browns.

with Philadelphia expected to join the list shortly.

The list of nay-sayers grows:

San Diego Chargers.
Philadelphia Eagles.
New York Jets.
Tennessee Titans.
St. Louis Rams.
New Orleans Saints.
Houston Texans.
Jacksonville Jaguars.

That's half the league, so far.

Mogulseeker
03-06-2009, 04:47 AM
How about this: against TO, twice a year, with the Raiders, with a $14mil bonus, cut the first year after totally taking apart the team.

Old Dude
03-06-2009, 07:12 AM
Since the Raiders just kept Javon Walker with a restructured deal, they might not be in pursuit of Owens either.