PDA

View Full Version : Tank johnson


dreasher54
01-19-2009, 08:23 PM
since the cowboys won't resign tank, and if we go to a 3-4 should we get him to be our NT??

LonghornBronco
01-19-2009, 08:26 PM
Is it a givin that we re converting to the 3-4. I hope not.

Killericon
01-19-2009, 08:36 PM
No.

Dagmar
01-19-2009, 09:30 PM
http://www.unbirthdaycardco.com/resources/hell+to+the+no.jpg

atomicbloke
01-19-2009, 09:35 PM
No.

SouthStndJunkie
01-19-2009, 09:36 PM
A potential turd is the last thing we need to give a fresh faced 32 year old rookie head coach to deal with.

TheDave
01-19-2009, 09:36 PM
The fact that the cowboys won't resign him is a major red flag

Dudeskey
01-19-2009, 10:08 PM
since the cowboys won't resign tank, and if we go to a 3-4 should we get him to be our NT??

No. **** that mother****er...

Broncos_OTM
01-19-2009, 11:17 PM
Tank would be a good NT if he wasnt such a cancer. one of the main reasosn he wont be re-signed. and this is the same team that has TO

McDman
01-19-2009, 11:23 PM
Who says he has been a cancer? Idk why the Cowboys are not signing him again, but since he got to Dallas he has not been in the news at all. I think he has behaved himself fairly well.

fontaine
01-20-2009, 03:59 AM
Tank kept out of trouble this past year.

He's not being retained because he didn't fit in the 3-4 Dallas runs so we shouldn't sign him here if that's the way we're going as well. But if we're going 4-3 then we should sign him.

Broncoman13
01-20-2009, 06:03 AM
I saw him plenty at camp last year and he is a **** talking MFer. The only other person on the field that was talking more trash than him was Pacman Jones. No to Tank.

Dedhed
01-20-2009, 06:25 AM
A potential turd is the last thing we need to give a fresh faced 32 year old rookie head coach to deal with.

Tank isn't a potential turd, he's a certified turd. He was Pacman's best friend in Dallas. That's all the indication I need.

Elway777
01-20-2009, 06:32 AM
He might have not been in touble with the law but worse he is a locker room cancer. No

supermanhr9
01-20-2009, 10:43 AM
Once upon a time I would've argued till I dropepd we should sign him, but that was a long time ago, when he wasn't such a turd, no to the tank, yes to the improvement of the defense through a bargain FA sign and a big first round pick.

rovolution
01-20-2009, 10:47 AM
Tank never played Nose Tackle for the boys. he came in on nickle situations when they went with 4 down linemen

19Morton77
01-20-2009, 11:40 AM
I saw him plenty at camp last year and he is a **** talking MFer. The only other person on the field that was talking more trash than him was Pacman Jones. No to Tank.

If he talks the talk and walks the walk then what is the problem? We had that same character in Shannon Sharpe and only Hogan didnt like his act. What bothers me is the talkers that dont back it up (like I saw before the last Chargers game in San Diego). He is a lineman so the talking or showboating is never seen on tv and is mostly between the players themselves.

McDman
01-20-2009, 11:46 AM
Post an article that states he is a locker room cancer.

WolfpackGuy
01-20-2009, 12:38 PM
Anybody that has more gats than sacks will probably not get the okay from Bowlen.

Dudeskey
01-20-2009, 02:13 PM
Tank isn't a potential turd, he's a certified turd. He was Pacman's best friend in Dallas. That's all the indication I need.

They don't call him "Tank" for nothing...Ha!

oubronco
01-20-2009, 03:42 PM
better than anything we have