PDA

View Full Version : US blocks UN Security Council from ending carnage in Gaza


mhgaffney
12-28-2008, 12:58 PM
I posted this already but it deserves a separate thread. Once again the US has used its veto to block the international community from intervening to stop the slaughter in Gaza.

Did the US media even report this?

The UN is now powerless to act -- because of the unhelpful US role. This is why the world despises America -- and why they view us as violent barbarians. BTW, they are right.

This is a familiar pattern. The same thing happened in 2006 when Israel was bombing Lebanon -- and also in 1982 during the first Israeli invasion of Lebanon led by Ariel Sharon. During that war Israel slaughtered 10-20,000 Lebanese, mostly civilians. After the 82 war the US punished Israel for its aggression by vastly expanding US aid.

History is repeating yet again.

MHG

US veto blocks UN anti-Israel resolution
Sun, 28 Dec 2008 08:17:23 GMT
http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id...onid=351020202

The UN Security Council has been unable to force an end to Israeli attacks against Gaza due to the intervention of the United States.

Washington once again used its veto powers on Sunday to block a resolution calling for an end to the massive ongoing Israeli attacks against the Gaza Strip.

The council has only been able to issue a 'non-binding' statement that calls on Israel to voluntarily bring all its military activities in the besieged region to an immediate end.

The statement comes as Israel has begun a fresh wave of air strikes on Gaza on Sunday, killing at least six people. At least 230 people were killed and 800 wounded in similar attacks on Saturday. The number of Palestinians deaths has so far risen to 271.

The council called on the parties to address the humanitarian crisis in the territory but has not criticized the Israeli air attacks.

Croatian UN Ambassador Neven Jurica read out the non-binding statement on behalf of the 15-member body that "called for an immediate halt to all violence" and on the parties "to stop immediately all military activities."

"The members of the Security Council expressed serious concern at the escalation of the situation in Gaza," he said, as the president of the council.

The council also requested the opening of border crossings into Gaza to address the serious humanitarian and economic needs in Gaza and to ensure medical treatment and a continuous supply of food and fuel.

US representative to the UNSC, Zalmay Khalilzad, defended the Israeli move, saying Tel Aviv has the right to self-defense.

"I regret the loss of any of all innocent life," he said, adding that Hamas rockets precipitated this situation.

Palestinian fighters in the Gaza Strip say they fire rockets into Israel in retaliation for the daily Israeli attacks against them. Unlike the state-of-the-art Israeli weapons and ammunition, the home-made Qassam rockets rarely cause casualties.

The US, a staunch ally to Israel, has so far vetoed over 40 anti-Israeli resolutions sought by the council since 1972.

Since 2004, Washington has prevented the adoption of four other resolutions that called for Tel Aviv to halt its operations in the Gaza Strip.

DB/AA/DT

W*GS
12-28-2008, 01:15 PM
I realize that gaffney believes that the Jews are 100% wrong, and that the Palestinians are completely and utterly blameless, but does anyone else here buy that line of bull**** (excepting LABF)?

cutthemdown
12-28-2008, 03:05 PM
I realize that gaffney believes that the Jews are 100% wrong, and that the Palestinians are completely and utterly blameless, but does anyone else here buy that line of bull**** (excepting LABF)?

Maybe Baja

cutthemdown
12-28-2008, 03:32 PM
Will Abbas use this as a chance to take the Gaza strip from Hamas? When Israel is through bombing them he could send his security forces in to take control.

mhgaffney
12-28-2008, 08:28 PM
The point you bozos refuse to face is that the world would have intervened and ended this conflict -- long ago -- but for the US support of Israel right or wrong.

And mostly wrong.

As I have pointed out -- the entire Arab world -- every single Arab nation -- has endorsed the 2002 Saudi peace offer to Israel.
http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/peace02.htm

Israel simply ignored the offer -- made no response at all -- and the US followed Israel's lead.

My question for W*gs and Cut is this:

Why? Why is the US allowing Israel to dictate US policy? Once upon a time -- under Ike and under JFK -- the US followed its own policy in the region. In 2008 we are simply doing whatever Israel wants.

This is the tail wagging the dog -- and is not acceptable for a nation that claims to be a superpower. Obviously, we are nothing but a paper tiger.

You cannot know if a peace offer is genuine unless you response to it. Therefor, the onus is on the US and Israel -- NOT the Arab world.

MHG

mhgaffney
12-28-2008, 08:32 PM
Will Abbas use this as a chance to take the Gaza strip from Hamas? When Israel is through bombing them he could send his security forces in to take control.

FYI, the Bush administration and Israel egged on Fatah to try to oust Hamas from Gaza. This happened more than a year ago --and led to near civil war in Gaza -- with Hamas prevailing after a lot of bloodshed.

Apparently you were too busy watching foooball or snoozing in front of the tube - to notice.

mhgaffney
12-28-2008, 08:35 PM
Hamas is NOT the issue.

The issue is the refusal of Israel to sit down and talk with the duly elected reps of the Palestinian people. I understand you don't like Hamas. But that's too ****ing bad. They were elected in a fair election -- so you just have to accept it.

BTW, most Israelis HAVE accepted it --and support negotiations. But you persist in the delusion that Palestinians are terrorists. You need to get over it.

I don't like most Repukes either -- but I do talk to them -- and Israel can talk to Hamas. Like it or not.

Obushma
12-28-2008, 10:08 PM
I realize that gaffney believes that the Jews are 100% wrong, and that the Palestinians are completely and utterly blameless, but does anyone else here buy that line of bull**** (excepting LABF)?

Wags once again pulls the "Neo-Cock" from him mouth to post.

cutthemdown
12-28-2008, 10:17 PM
FYI, the Bush administration and Israel egged on Fatah to try to oust Hamas from Gaza. This happened more than a year ago --and led to near civil war in Gaza -- with Hamas prevailing after a lot of bloodshed.

Apparently you were too busy watching foooball or snoozing in front of the tube - to notice.

no I noticed. I may disagree with how it occurred but I understand Fatah in west bank and Hamas in Gaza.

Israel has effectively splintered them. Or Hamas and Fatah splintered themselves. More likely a little of both.

My point is it looks like Fatah sitting back and enjoying this. They may even be in on it and just waiting to take control after it's over.

I would support probably a lot of what you want Gaff. For Israel to return Golan Heights. For Israel to let Palestinians make Jerusalem there capital etc.

I just feel those things are about as likely as Broncos stopping someone.

I also understand Israel's way of looking at it. Even if they give those things up they would probably still have missiles launched at them, still have to worry about the next time the Arabs try to take them out.

W*GS
12-29-2008, 07:11 AM
The point you bozos refuse to face is that the world would have intervened and ended this conflict -- long ago -- but for the US support of Israel right or wrong.

And mostly wrong.

It's your takes, and your tainted views, that are mostly wrong.

Just like with 9/11, on this issue you are cherry-picking facts and telling outright lies.

As I have pointed out -- the entire Arab world -- every single Arab nation -- has endorsed the 2002 Saudi peace offer to Israel.
http://www.al-bab.com/arab/docs/league/peace02.htm

Israel simply ignored the offer -- made no response at all -- and the US followed Israel's lead.

If Israel "made no response at all", why did then-Foreign Minister Shimon Peres say:

"Israel views positively every initiative aimed at arriving at peace and normalization. In this respect, the Saudi step is an important one, but it is liable to founder if terrorism is not stopped. We cannot, of course, ignore the problematic aspects which arose at the Beirut Summit and the harsh and rejectionist language used by some of the speakers.

It is also clear that the details of every peace plan must be discussed directly between Israel and the Palestinians, and to make this possible, the Palestinian Authority must put an end to terror, the horrifying expression of which we witnessed just last night in Netanya."

The Netanya massacre was a terrorist attack (claimed by Hamas) that killed 30 Israelis, including some Holocaust survivors.

Don't you think Israel would be a bit sceptical considering the Saudi plan after that, gaffney?

W*GS
12-29-2008, 07:14 AM
Wags once again pulls the "Neo-Cock" from him mouth to post.

Go back to keeping gaffney's taint crust-free. Otherwise you make a fool of yourself - as witnessed above.

The Lone Bolt
12-29-2008, 08:37 AM
Gaff, that peace initiative once again insists on the unreasonable "right of return" (I've read it myself so don't deny it), which would effectively destroy the state of Israel.

It is a false peace offering which the Saudis knew full well would be unacceptable to Israel (and rightly so).

NUB
12-29-2008, 08:39 AM
Israel isn't going to return the Golan Heights after what Syria tried to pull.

As for this whole thing... Israel is phasing out the Palestinian problem, that's pretty clear. They've been doing it for decades now depending on whether or not you believe in the "broadcasts". Both sides are at fault and anyone who takes sides confidently catches my suspicion immediately.


As for the U.S. and the U.N., here are some recent votes that made me laugh:

http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2008/gashc3941.doc.htm

Vote on Right to Food

The draft resolution on the right to food (document A/C.3/63/L.42/Rev.1) was approved by a recorded vote of 180 in favour to 1 against, with no abstentions, as follows:

In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia (Federated States of), Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Against: United States.

Abstain: None.

Absent: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Guatemala, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Palau, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Somalia, Tuvalu.

ANNEX IV

Vote on Right to Development

The draft resolution on the right development (document A/C.3/63/L.30/Rev.1) was approved by a recorded vote of 177 in favour to 1 against, with 2 abstentions, as follows:

In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Côte d’Ivoire, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Against: United States.

Abstain: Canada, Israel.

Absent: Central African Republic, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia (Federated States of), Palau, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Somalia, Tonga, Tuvalu.



Vote on Rights of the Child

The draft resolution on the rights of the child (document A/C.3/63/L.16/Rev.1) was approved by a recorded vote of 180 in favour to 1 against, with no abstentions, as follows:

In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Andorra, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Belarus, Belgium, Belize, Benin, Bhutan, Bolivia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Brunei Darussalam, Bulgaria, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Canada, Cape Verde, Chad, Chile, China, Colombia, Comoros, Congo, Costa Rica, Croatia, Cuba, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Denmark, Djibouti, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Egypt, El Salvador, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gabon, Gambia, Georgia, Germany, Ghana, Greece, Grenada, Guatemala, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Hungary, Iceland, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Jamaica, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Latvia, Lebanon, Lesotho, Liberia, Libya, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Marshall Islands, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mexico, Micronesia (Federated States of), Monaco, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Mozambique, Myanmar, Namibia, Nauru, Nepal, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Oman, Pakistan, Palau, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Republic of Korea, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Samoa, San Marino, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Serbia, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Suriname, Swaziland, Sweden, Switzerland, Syria, Tajikistan, Thailand, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Timor-Leste, Togo, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, Ukraine, United Arab Emirates, United Kingdom, United Republic of Tanzania, Uruguay, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Viet Nam, Yemen, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

Against: United States.

Abstain: None.

Absent: Central African Republic, Côte d’Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Kiribati, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Seychelles, Somalia, Tuvalu, Vanuatu.

mhgaffney
12-29-2008, 02:06 PM
While you knee jerks quibble the 1.5 million people of Gaza are being bombed and murdered. I just received this report from Barbara Lubin, a Jewish peace activist who collects donations for direct delivery of food and medicines to the Gaza refugee camps. Barbara's fund is known as THE MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE. I'll post the URL later.

Because of Israel's ongoing seige Barbara has not been able to deliver food/medicine since last July. The borders have been closed for months.

Here is her brief report -- and a photo. Notice the terror in the child's eyes. Many Gaza children are half-deaf from the (US made) Israeli F-16s breaking the sound barrier low over the area -- which they do day and night. Many childeren are also malnourished -- and all are just a few meals away from starvation:

In one of its bloodiest military operations, Israel continues a wide-scale air strike operation against the Gaza Strip. More than 300 people have been killed and hundeds more have been injured, most of whom are non-combatants.

Dozens of homes were destroyed, along with tens of UN and government schools and clinics. Local government offices and private vehicles were also destroyed. Al Mezan's initial monitoring indicates that at least 257 people have been killed in the IOF's strikes in the last 24 hours.

This brutal aggression comes amidst unprecedented deterioration of the humanitarian conditions. Gaza's 1.5 million persons face because of Israel's tight siege which prevents their access to food, medicine and power. Gaza's hospitals, already functioning with severe shortages in medicines and equipment, are now receiving hundreds of people with life-threatening injuries.

mhgaffney
12-29-2008, 02:16 PM
This is for W*gs:

You foolishly quote Shimon Peres. The guy is a notorious liar. Peres has been on every side of every issue for so long that no one in Israel takes him seriously. His long political career -- spanning more than 60 years -- has always been governed by one thing: his own personal ambition.

Check around. You'll find this is a correct assessment.(Oh but I forget -- you are a knee jerk. Research is not something you do.)

MHG

cutthemdown
12-29-2008, 03:35 PM
I think only 250 people killed shows Israel is trying to limit civilians casualties.

It sucks for the Palestinians that there leaders never take what will happen to them into account. The civilians are just pawns for Hamas to use as martyr's in the competition for world opinion.

If Israel didn't care at all then there would thousands dead already.

The Palestinians need better leadership and maybe then they would have a chance. If Hamas continues to lead them then they really have no hope but to look forward to being bombed and attacked every few yrs when Israel tires of rocket attacks.

Meck77
12-29-2008, 03:43 PM
We're seeing the result of two groups of people who believe they are they are a "chosen people" who can do no wrong. That's fine and dandy with me. Glad I don't live there. They can thump their chests and scream as loud as they want that their God is on their side. Meanwhile both sides keep butchering one another. What a great way to live!

Hopefully we don't go down with Israeli ship though. Maybe one day the average American will see that destroying our way of life for Israel just isn't worth it. We're aren't there yet.

Maybe when a suicide bomber rips thru a kindergarten class in Chicago America will get a wake a call. 9-11 apparently wasn't enough. They love to tell us we should defend Israel at any cost though don't they!

enjolras
12-29-2008, 09:01 PM
I've never really seen good hard numbers on this. Does the average American really support our Isreal policy? Outside of the hard line religious nuts, I have never met a single person who is truly supportive of our policies toward Isreal.

Most people are actually quite ignorant of the whole thing from what I can tell.

It seems to me that the Isreali lobby is such a powerful force that they create their own inertia.

cutthemdown
12-29-2008, 11:28 PM
I've never really seen good hard numbers on this. Does the average American really support our Isreal policy? Outside of the hard line religious nuts, I have never met a single person who is truly supportive of our policies toward Isreal.

Most people are actually quite ignorant of the whole thing from what I can tell.

It seems to me that the Isreali lobby is such a powerful force that they create their own inertia.

I think the reason Israel not an issue because they never ask us to actually fight for them. Americans see them as a country that handles it's own business.

Let's get one thing straight that everyone can agree on. Israel is for Israel and no one else. They don't care about American interests or telling the truth to America. The bombed one of our ships once and got away with it. The spy on us behind our backs while having a hand out in front.

Having said that IMO we have way more in common with the Jews then we do the Muslims. That's one reason we have gravitated to there side.

Since we will never change those things what we need to realize is that although Israel not our best friend they are better friends then countries like Syria and Iran will ever be.

What we need to do is take a stand on exactly what our position is going to be. What do we expect from Israel, what do we expect from the Palestinians. It seems to me we never come out and say what we think would be fair. We talk about a cessation of violence all the time but not how to keep that violence from coming back.

kappys
01-02-2009, 10:34 AM
I think only 250 people killed shows Israel is trying to limit civilians casualties.

It sucks for the Palestinians that there leaders never take what will happen to them into account. The civilians are just pawns for Hamas to use as martyr's in the competition for world opinion.

If Israel didn't care at all then there would thousands dead already.

The Palestinians need better leadership and maybe then they would have a chance. If Hamas continues to lead them then they really have no hope but to look forward to being bombed and attacked every few yrs when Israel tires of rocket attacks.


250 dead is only the start of this catatrophe. It is likely that hundreds or possibly thousands more will die from the destruction of infrastructure which is far more serious.

I give Isreal no credit for restraint because they are able to avoid the temptation of genocide.

mhgaffney
01-02-2009, 11:49 AM
Cut,

I'm sorry to have to tell you and the others that you are all mistaken. The issue here is NOT the Jews versus the Muslims.

The issue is Colonialism.

Israel is one of the last of the settler colonies on the planet -- and is not unique. There are many historical examples -- and they were all evil in their own way.

Colonialism in our time is outdated just as slavery was outdated in the 19th century. Israel is thus a throw back to a different kind of world -- where white Europeans lorded over the rest of humanity. For example, Britain funded its industrial revolutioin with wealth stolen from India, which was the jewel in the British crown. The stolen wealth was never repaid, I might add.

Our uncritical support for Israel has thus placed the US on the wrong side of history. The region is prepared to accept a Jewish state in their midst -- but only on terms that give a measure of justice and dignity to the Palestinians, who have at least an equal claim to the the land of Palestine.

Israel's refusal to sit down and negotiate a fair peace settlement with the Palestinians and with their neighbors has only been possible because of uncritical US support. Israel cannot continue its unjust policies without US military and diplomatic backing --so the US role is crucial.

This conflict can easily explode globally -- and escalate into WW III. This is why it is so important -- that we educate our countrymen to the real issues -- and stimulate a debate that can bring about a positive shift in US policy.

Unfortunately, time is short. At present --- we are headed over the cliff. I tend to be pessimistic that we can achieve the needed change before the explosion comes -- but for the sake of the children we must try our best.

Either way future generations -- assuming anyone survives what is coming -- will look back on America's role with contempt and disdain.

MHG

W*GS
01-02-2009, 12:02 PM
gaffney, you're one of the most disgusting posters here.

When you're not blaming Jews for all the evil in the world, you're trying to profit from 9/11.

You suck.