PDA

View Full Version : No Home Run for McCain


Bronco_Beerslug
09-05-2008, 04:07 AM
War Room
By Alex Koppelman
Friday, Sept. 5, 2008 00:30 EDT
No home run for McCain (http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/)

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- John McCain started off slow. And for a moment, when anti-war protesters broke in and heckled him, distracting his crowd's attention, it seemed that all might be lost and that he might fall completely flat on a night in which he needed to shine.

But the Republican nominee and his speechwriter had saved the best -- in this case, the story of McCain's time as a prisoner of war -- for last. It was a moving section, one that seemed to make the entire Xcel Center go silent. And it made for a good transition into his closing argument, a call for Americans to join with him to fight for their country. Now the McCain campaign just has to hope that voters at home kept watching long enough to see the big finish.

So far, the reviews aren't good. CNN's Jeffrey Toobin calling this " the worst speech by a nominee that I’ve heard since Jimmy Carter in 1980" is one thing. But the harsh critique that former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson delivered on MSNBC (which Barack Obama's campaign was quick to blast out to reporters) was something else entirely.

"Pretty disappointing," Gerson said. "I think that was a missed opportunity. Many Americans needed to hear from this speech something they have never heard from Republicans before. And in reality, a lot of the policy they’ve heard from Republicans before."
― Alex Koppelman


Thursday, Sept. 4, 2008 23:18 EDT
McCain and Palin party down

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- The speech was flat, the backdrop went from lime green to electric blue, and the Xcel Energy Center ain't exactly Mile High Stadium, but there is something nice about a traditional balloon drop at the end of a convention, and John McCain knows it.

The Republican convention came to a close Thursday night amidst a sea of confetti, balloons and streamers, and you sort of had to wonder whether a Barack Obama victory this fall would mean an end to one of the oldest tableaus in American politics. (If the guy can pack football stadiums, he may not need gigantic balloons to rev the crowd up.) Yeah, the scene looked like it could have been straight out of 1980, and that doesn't do much to give the impression that McCain is the candidate of the future. (Or to counter the Democratic message, which was that McCain didn't spell out how he would change the direction the country's going.) Still, the whole crowd looked like it was having fun in the flood of red, white and blue falling from the ceiling. Maybe getting rid of balloon drops is one change America doesn't need yet.

The music, however, betrayed a certain literal-mindedness. "Barracuda," by Heart -- a nod to Sarah Palin's nickname. "Dancing in September," by Earth, Wind & Fire -- the perfect song to dance to, on Sept. 4! (Though it's hard to call what Republican delegates do to music dancing.) "Celebration," by Kool & the Gang, "Don't Stop Believing," by Journey, "Everyday People," by Sly & the Family Stone... every song had a message, and they weren't very subtle. But then again, neither was the convention, so maybe that was apt.



Thursday, Sept. 4, 2008 22:40 EDTProtesters disrupt McCain speech

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- If you're at home watching John McCain's speech at the Republican Convention and wondering why he made a few odd pauses and why the crowd broke into the occasional chant of "USA! USA!" it's because a few antiwar protesters got into the hall and started heckling him during his speech.

The first hecklers were off-camera, located conveniently above the press stands. Two men, carrying banners that read "You can't win an occupation," began shouting questions for McCain. They managed to divert the attention of the press and a substantial portion of the crowd; McCain, who couldn't see what was going on from his vantage point, seemed confused. It seems as though both men have been removed, though it's hard to be sure from where I'm sitting.

Later, a second protester, this one on the floor and not far from the podium, broke into the speech, leading to more chants from McCain's supporters and more disruption of the speech. This time, McCain was able to figure out what was going on. "Please don't be diverted by the ground noise and the static," he quipped, earning himself a big round of applause. "Americans want us to stop yelling at each other."
― Alex Koppelman



Palin camp claims Dems attacking her family, can't name any

A fundraising letter that Sarah Palin's camp sent out Thursday afternoon tells potential donors, "Unfortunately, as you've seen this week, the Obama/Biden Democrats have been vicious in their attacks directed toward me, my family and John McCain. The misinformation and flat-out lies must be corrected."

The point, of course, is that the McCain/Palin campaign needs money to help defend against these awful "Obama/Biden Democrats."
That is, if they exist at all.

A couple reporters have now pressed various spokespeople for specifics about who's being referenced in the letter. One of them, ABC News' Jake Tapper, reports (http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/palin-accuses-o.html): The response I got was that Obama spokesman Mark Bubriski erroneously attacked Palin as a supporter of Pat Buchanan. That's it. That's the evidence.
An attack on Palin herself.
In other words, they can't name one person affiliated with the Obama-Biden campaign who attacked the Palin family.
Sara Kugler of the Associated Press got a slightly different answer (http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080904/ap_on_el_pr/cvn_palin) when she posed the same question to a spokeswoman for Palin. "Asked who was to blame, the spokeswoman said, 'You want me to tick through all the stuff that's been ticking through all the blogs the past few days? What about the stuff that was on Daily Kos, that rumor that was spread?'" Kugler says.
Actually, as Tapper notes, there are some politicians who have personally attacked opponents' family members. For instance, in 1998, it was John McCain who joked, "Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno."
― Alex Koppelman



Thursday, Sept. 4, 2008 21:04 EDT
Karl Rove, flip-flopper

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- When you cover politics (hell, if you've even paid attention to it for about a day or so) you quickly learn that politicians and their surrogates have an incredible ability to peddle utter crap while maintaining a completely straight face. Still, though, I can't shake the feeling that this sort of thing reached new heights of absurdity this week.

Maybe it's because we've really seen the curtain pulled back this week. The recording (http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/09/03/noonan_murphy/) of the conversation between Chuck Todd, Peggy Noonan and Mike Murphy that popped up was particularly revealing. It was a close look at the deep doubts about the Sarah Palin choice remaining in the Republican establishment and, seemingly, even among those tapped to go on television and defend her.

And, of course, the crack research team at "The Daily Show" came through with some similarly illuminating material. Check out this segment from Wednesday night's show -- among the highlights, Karl Rove gets caught in a rather radical shift in his position on the question of what kind of prior experience a vice-president should have.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/video/index.jhtml?videoId=184086&title=Sarah-Palin-Gender-Card



Thursday, Sept. 4, 2008 10:50 EDT
Noonan aplogizes for Palin remarks -- sort of


Conservative columnist Peggy Noonan had some 'splaining to do last night. On Wednesday, she -- along with MSNBC's Chuck Todd and prominent GOP strategist Mike Murphy -- was caught on a live mike calling the selection of Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin as John McCain's running mate "political bull****," something at odds with the tone of the column she'd just published. So now she has explained herself. And apologized. Well, to a certain extent, at least.

"Well, I just got mugged by the nature of modern media, and I wish it weren't my fault, but it is," Noonan says in a new introduction appended to the online version (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122044753790594947.html?mod=todays_columnists) of her column from Wednesday. She continues: In our off-air conversation, I got on the subject of the leaders of the Republican party assuming, now, that whatever the base of the Republican party thinks is what America thinks. I made the case that this is no longer true ... And when I said, "It's over!" -- and I said it more than once -- that is what I was referring to ... However, I did say two things that I haven't said in public, either in speaking or in my writing. One is a vulgar epithet that I wish I could blame on the mood of the moment but cannot ... But, bottom line, I am certainly sorry I blurted my barnyard ephithet, I am certainly sorry that someone abused my meaning in the use of the words, "It's over," and I'm sorry I didn't have the Kay Bailey Hutchison thought before this morning, because I could have written of it. There. Now: onto today's column.
― Alex Koppelman

Stormontheplains
09-05-2008, 05:53 AM
if you listened to his speech, it was great. He denounced the last 8 years, got into detail of what he would like to do, I was very impressed

theAPAOps5
09-05-2008, 05:57 AM
He denounced the last 8 years! Then you should be totally upset, you are the one who said George W. Bush is your hero.

TailgateNut
09-05-2008, 06:39 AM
if you listened to his speech, it was great. He denounced the last 8 years, got into detail of what he would like to do, I was very impressed


So, did he, denounce his support. I watched as much as I could "stomach", and I didn't hear him talk about hobknobbing Bush as his did during those years. Was he re-born lately, or is he just trying to BS his way into the Oval office.
Me thinks, it's the latter.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 07:55 AM
He denounced the last 8 years! Then you should be totally upset, you are the one who said George W. Bush is your hero.

Ha! :yep:

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 07:57 AM
But the harsh critique that former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson delivered on MSNBC (which Barack Obama's campaign was quick to blast out to reporters) was something else entirely.

"Pretty disappointing," Gerson said. "I think that was a missed opportunity. Many Americans needed to hear from this speech something they have never heard from Republicans before. And in reality, a lot of the policy they’ve heard from Republicans before."

Ouch! :D

Garcia Bronco
09-05-2008, 08:02 AM
if you listened to his speech, it was great. He denounced the last 8 years, got into detail of what he would like to do, I was very impressed

He did do that. I like that as well. He point blank said that they've llost Amercia's trust.

Hotrod
09-05-2008, 08:04 AM
I liked it just fine. Obviously nothing special. My one concern was he looks old and tired.

They still have my vote for now.

Rohirrim
09-05-2008, 08:07 AM
I thought the personal aspects of the speech were very moving. I didn't really listen to the policy stuff because I knew that was just blah, blah, blah. I was surprisingly impressed with Cindy. Her life history is one of caring for children and putting herself out there in the worst places, helping the less fortunate. Very admirable.

Drek
09-05-2008, 08:25 AM
if you listened to his speech, it was great. He denounced the last 8 years, got into detail of what he would like to do, I was very impressed

What detail?

Give some. What is he going to do for the economy? What is he going to do for energy? Saying "I'm for renewables" and "I'm for jobs" is worthless. Obama says "I'm for renewables and I'm going to give tax breaks for X amount to companies who invest in them, put X amount into government research programs for renewables, and put another X amount into the free market to spur competitive R&D in the private sector for all these different renewables". That is detail, that is policy. McCain is throwing out buzz words like they'll have traction.

He denounced the last 8 years pretty well, but that is at odds with his voting record. Also, he's been in the senate all of these 8 years.

His campaign has bailed on the "Obama isn't experienced enough/doesn't have substance" because it didn't work and lost what little traction it had when Obama gave his stellar acceptance speech. Now what they are basically doing is saying "we've ****ed up the last 8 years, but why not give us another chance? We promise we'll change."

He's got nothing, the new polling data that has Obama widing his national lead and taking over battle ground states in state polls backs that up. He's a dead man walking and they're grasping at whatever straw they can to stay competitive.

Hotrod
09-05-2008, 08:27 AM
If McCain wins the melt down of team socialist is going to be classic.

Rohirrim
09-05-2008, 08:29 AM
If McCain wins the melt down of team socialist is going to be classic.

As will the meltdown of team America.

Hotrod
09-05-2008, 08:37 AM
As will the meltdown of team America.

I disagree.

Pseudofool
09-05-2008, 08:41 AM
It was a pretty bad speech guys. As far as speeches go. It was not well delivered and didn't seem well organized, thematic, or passionate. I appreciated the turn towards moderation, but McCain doesn't deliver moderation well. If he's not angry, he's not really effective as a candidate...

Rohirrim
09-05-2008, 08:41 AM
I disagree.

Well, of course you do. ;D

Tell us all how the country will be better off under a McCain/Palin presidency. What will it look like in four years?

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 08:44 AM
It was a pretty bad speech guys. As far as speeches go. It was not well delivered and didn't seem well organized, thematic, or passionate. I appreciated the turn towards moderation, but McCain doesn't deliver moderation well. If he's not angry, he's not really effective as a candidate...

:yep:

Even GeeDubya's speechwriter thought so:

But the harsh critique that former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson delivered on MSNBC (which Barack Obama's campaign was quick to blast out to reporters) was something else entirely.

"Pretty disappointing," Gerson said. "I think that was a missed opportunity. Many Americans needed to hear from this speech something they have never heard from Republicans before. And in reality, a lot of the policy they’ve heard from Republicans before."

That's gotta sting if you're a McSame water carrier. :giggle:

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 08:45 AM
I disagree.

You disagreed last time - and you were wrong then too.

Rohirrim
09-05-2008, 08:46 AM
When I was watching Cindy's story I was thinking, I wonder if she goes in the booth and votes Dem. ;D

The Lone Bolt
09-05-2008, 08:47 AM
It was a pretty bad speech guys. As far as speeches go. It was not well delivered and didn't seem well organized, thematic, or passionate. I appreciated the turn towards moderation, but McCain doesn't deliver moderation well. If he's not angry, he's not really effective as a candidate...

I disagree. It wasn't well delivered until the end, but his theme of "working for a cause greater than yourself" was very clear and consistent, and he gave personal reasons why he believes in it.

Obama may be a better public speaker, and I probably won't vote for McCain anyway, but I will give Mac credit for delivering a memorable message. Honestly I have trouble remembering what Obama's main message was, but McCain's was clear.

Stormontheplains
09-05-2008, 08:58 AM
What detail?

Give some. What is he going to do for the economy? What is he going to do for energy? Saying "I'm for renewables" and "I'm for jobs" is worthless. Obama says "I'm for renewables and I'm going to give tax breaks for X amount to companies who invest in them, put X amount into government research programs for renewables, and put another X amount into the free market to spur competitive R&D in the private sector for all these different renewables". That is detail, that is policy. McCain is throwing out buzz words like they'll have traction.

He denounced the last 8 years pretty well, but that is at odds with his voting record. Also, he's been in the senate all of these 8 years.

His campaign has bailed on the "Obama isn't experienced enough/doesn't have substance" because it didn't work and lost what little traction it had when Obama gave his stellar acceptance speech. Now what they are basically doing is saying "we've ****ed up the last 8 years, but why not give us another chance? We promise we'll change."

He's got nothing, the new polling data that has Obama widing his national lead and taking over battle ground states in state polls backs that up. He's a dead man walking and they're grasping at whatever straw they can to stay competitive.

Obama on his last 85 votes, voted with GW, there's real change.

As far as the economy, he knows our biggest weakness is the stregnth of the dollar, he also knows that oil has to be drilled now, once we began drilling and the price drops, average americans will have more money to spend on goods and services. I know what small amount I contribute goes to fuel and utilities instead of retail.

My biggest point for Mcain is he really wants this country to suceed. I believe he does care more about our long term success more than his own. With Obama as with this site, I can not stand the higher educated elite, and thier attitude. I have no one I have known in my life that has been on welfare, umemployment, or medicaid, I can not relate to the poor that cant find work, I have never seen it, so there for I can't identify with thier politics. There are always jobs, and if they dont pay as much, then you get 2 jobs.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 08:59 AM
I can not stand the higher educated elite, and thier attitude.

That explains SO much. :spit:

Rohirrim
09-05-2008, 09:05 AM
I have no one I have known in my life that has been on welfare, umemployment, or medicaid, I can not relate to the poor that cant find work, I have never seen it, so there for I can't identify with thier politics. There are always jobs, and if they dont pay as much, then you get 2 jobs.

Maybe, like Cindy McCain, you should broaden your horizons a little and go out into the world and see it. Just because you ignore the misery doesn't make it go away. I work at a hospital and see it every day. There are many in the world in great suffering who need help. There are many who are desperately poor and need a hand. Lend them yours.

Play2win
09-05-2008, 09:06 AM
That explains SO much. :spit:

to him the "higher educated elite" = GED... ;D

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 09:10 AM
to him the "higher educated elite" = GED... ;D

ROFL! ^5

Stormontheplains
09-05-2008, 09:14 AM
Maybe, like Cindy McCain, you should broaden your horizons a little and go out into the world and see it. Just because you ignore the misery doesn't make it go away. I work at a hospital and see it every day. There are many in the world in great suffering who need help. There are many who are desperately poor and need a hand. Lend them yours.

My point being that around here we help people all the time through fundraising, donations, or just helping my ederly nieghbor. I don't ignore, I would say I deal with it by action. Which brings me to the divide in this country, which I believe is not the dem's or gop I believe it to be urban vs rural, and how much our life experiences are completely different. I feel out here it is city vs country and it just so happens the gop embraces the country

Stormontheplains
09-05-2008, 09:17 AM
to him the "higher educated elite" = GED... ;D

My education is 96 college credit hours, I quit after I hurt my knee the last time, my wife has her associates in science, my point being my family lives in a nice house, we have some education, and I currently have all my teeth with only 2 cavities.

Hotrod
09-05-2008, 09:20 AM
Obama on his last 85 votes, voted with GW, there's real change.

As far as the economy, he knows our biggest weakness is the stregnth of the dollar, he also knows that oil has to be drilled now, once we began drilling and the price drops, average americans will have more money to spend on goods and services. I know what small amount I contribute goes to fuel and utilities instead of retail.

My biggest point for Mcain is he really wants this country to suceed. I believe he does care more about our long term success more than his own. With Obama as with this site, I can not stand the higher educated elite, and thier attitude. I have no one I have known in my life that has been on welfare, umemployment, or medicaid, I can not relate to the poor that cant find work, I have never seen it, so there for I can't identify with thier politics. There are always jobs, and if they dont pay as much, then you get 2 jobs.

Exactly! I've got mine so ****'em

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 09:37 AM
....and I currently have all my teeth with only 2 cavities.

That makes you a member of the 'elite' compared to the average Bush supporter. :D

Bronco Bob
09-05-2008, 10:28 PM
Obama on his last 85 votes, voted with GW, there's real change.

Could you list those 85 votes. I want to see if perhaps GW finally wised
up and voted with Obama.



As far as the economy, he knows our biggest weakness is the stregnth of the dollar, he also knows that oil has to be drilled now, once we began drilling and the price drops, average americans will have more money to spend on goods and services. I know what small amount I contribute goes to fuel and utilities instead of retail.

That's just plain silly. It will be 10 years + before we see a drop of that
oil. Meantime we could become self sufficient with wind and solar.



My biggest point for Mcain is he really wants this country to suceed. I believe he does care more about our long term success more than his own.

And Obama doesn't? Obama has more of a stake in the US than McCain.
Obama has two young daughters. He's looking for an America 50 years from
now when his daughters have grandchildren.


With Obama as with this site, I can not stand the higher educated elite, and thier attitude. I have no one I have known in my life that has been on welfare, umemployment, or medicaid, I can not relate to the poor that cant find work, I have never seen it, so there for I can't identify with thier politics. There are always jobs, and if they dont pay as much, then you get 2 jobs.

Well, I have. And the world isn't some Leave it to Beaver world.
There are people out there with real hardships and problems.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-05-2008, 10:37 PM
Could you list those 85 votes. I want to see if perhaps GW finally wised
up and voted with Obama.


Ha!

Isn't that a riot?

First they say "Obama is the most left-leaning senator in the Democratic party" - and then they say "but Obama voted with Bush 85 times."

No wonder these people can be so easily hoodwinked by the Sarah Palins of the world. :D

Odysseus
09-05-2008, 10:57 PM
As will the meltdown of team America.

I agree.

McCain is a major mistake.

BroncsRule
09-05-2008, 11:20 PM
Johnny's speech was dull as a sack of doorknobs. And no details at all - the only specific thing he said was that he would double the tax deduction from $3,500 per child to $7,000 per child.

Other than that, he spoke in generalities about building more nuke plants, education vouchers, holding teachers accountable, running off the bad teachers.

He promised to lower taxes, reduce expenditures, veto pork barrel spending bills.

He told some specific vignettes about people in the hall - a poor couple from Michigan who had lost all of their real estate investment properties and had to get real jobs - a couple who had lost their son in Iraq. but specific stories about people does not equal policy specifics.

And, of course, he told his POW stories for the last 15 minutes or so.

He then managed to find his voice for a rousing finale: "Fight with me! Fight for America!"

Perhaps because he was so deathly dull for the first 45 minutes, it made the transition to the last 30 seconds actually seem kind of dramatic.

All in all, a dreadful, desperate speech.

gunns
09-05-2008, 11:43 PM
As will the meltdown of team America.

I agree. My father, a Korean war vet, a life long Republican, proud American, who I avoid talking politics, called me the other day and said that if McCain wins the election, on November 5th he will hang the flag at half mast. He has a huge flag pole in his front yard.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
09-10-2008, 04:25 AM
Protester who interrupted McCain’s speech is an Iraq War Veteran

Much has been made of the surge strategy in Iraq by the McCain/Palin ticket since John McCain supported it and it should open the door to actually discuss the conduct of this God awful war and those brave soldiers who come home from it and the ones who do not. Putting personalities aside, drama aside, let us at least discuss this war. Yes, we are spending $10 billion a month on it, but what about the true human cost meaning those who have died and those who come home. Some forever broken.

In his acceptance speech before the Republican convention, there was no mention of the veterans who have served over in Iraq by John McCain. As he gave his acceptance speech a protester interrupted that speech and this is what McCain said of it, "My friends, my dear friends ... please, please don't be diverted by the ground noise and the static," in which those gathered at the convention shouted back at that protester, “USA” over and over. Let some of them walk a mile in his shoes.

Little did they know or John McCain know that this protester actually served over in Iraq and according to Iraq Veterans Against the War, his name is, Adam Kokesh who is an IVAW board member. He held up a sign stating, "McCain Votes Against Vets." Surge nothing, this patriotic American actually put on the uniform, served his country deserved some respect coming from McCain and those Republicans gathered at the convention. While they may not have know who he was, it was the sign that should have at least clued them in before they belligerently shouted him down.

According to IVAW, “McCain's record on veterans' issues is extremely poor. He received a "D" rating from the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America and the Disabled American Veterans reports that he voted for legislation benefiting veterans only 20% of the time.” That is one dismal record and the mainstream media should press him on it. Then again, the McCain campaign as well as those in attendance demonized the media by calling them elitists. But, the facts should be brought out none the less.

Another fact not really being talked about as reported by the IVAW, "Despite numerous mailed, faxed, and in-person invitations to meet, McCain’s office refused to send anyone to receive the briefing. When Davey, a retired Army First Sergeant and former St. Paul police officer, attempted to deliver the briefing, he was escorted off the premises." Such arrogance coming from the McCain campaign.

If McCain truly wants to be the Commander in Chief of the armed forces; shouldn’t he at least hear any grievances and concerns coming from these veterans? You would think so. Then again, he has circled the wagons where he will not allow the mainstream media to interview Sarah Palin. Obama, McCain, Biden and others have been fully vetted by the media and so should Palin.

On May 21st, 2008, The Nation reported that Senator Barack Obama slammed McCain for not supporting a GI bill sponsored by Virginia’s senator, Jim Webb and Nebraska’s senator, Chuck Hagel. This bill “would increase the amount of money given to returning vets to cover tuition, books, and a living stipend…”

Also reported by The Nation, "Today, soldiers receive only a fraction of the benefits that they used to, and the college costs covered by the military are usually only enough to cover about 60 percent of a public education, and far less at a private institution."

It was none other than Senator Barack Obama who stood up for our veterans when he said, "He is one of the few Senators (meaning McCain) of either party who oppose this bill because he thinks it's too generous. I couldn't disagree more." So Barack did not wear a flag lapel pin, but he did after all stand up in support of our veterans when it counted most.

According to Veterans for Common Sense, they do list McCain’s dismal record in his non-support of our troops and veterans.

This site reports that "John McCain skipped close to a dozen votes on Iraq, and on at least another 10 occasions, he voted against arming and equipping the troops, providing adequate rest for the troops between deployments and for health care or other benefits for veterans." Yet, yet, he wants to be the Commander in Chief of the Armed forces?
Below you will read but a few votes McCain voted against.

September 2007: McCain voted against the Webb amendment calling for adequate troop rest between deployments. At the time, nearly 65% of people polled in a CNN poll indicted that "things are going either moderately badly or very badly in Iraq.

May 2006: McCain voted against an amendment that would provide $20 million to the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for health care facilities.

April 2006: McCain was one of only 13 Senators to vote against $430,000,000 for the Department of Veteran Affairs for Medical Services for outpatient care and treatment for veterans.

March 2006: McCain voted against increasing Veterans medical services funding by $1.5 billion in FY 2007 to be paid for by closing corporate tax loopholes.

In reading a past piece by The Hill dated, May 17th, 2007,
you will read, “Sen. McCain has spent considerable time defending the president on Iraq and catering to the Republican base on immigration, but has only managed to show up for four of the last 14 Iraq votes…”

It is no wonder why that protester who interrupted his speech was so angry. I would be too especially if a candidate could become the next president of the United States.

We should expect more from a man who can become the next president, but again, according to The Hill, "McCain’s campaign said the rigorous travel schedule necessary when running for the White House makes it extremely difficult to be voting all the time in Washington."

The McCain/Palin ticket or should we say the McBush/Palin ticket often states that Senator Obama just talks, but when it came to these important votes, he did what was expected of him when one reads, “Barack Obama (D-Ill.) voted on each of the 14 measures.” Voting is an action and it is exactly why his constituents voted him into office in the first place.

This article also cites, "Iraq has arguably become the central issue of McCain’s campaign, as he has been the most outspoken in his defense of the recent troop surge." Well what about McCain's defense and support of our troops when they do need him?

Yes, he was a POW during the Viet Nam War and did come home, but we also must remember that over 58,000 soldiers did not make it home alive from that war. So far over 4,000 did not make it home from this war and those still serving are being stretched to the limit.

I will be writing of the devastation of war during the next few weeks, since McBush brought it up, but I wish to end this one piece with one of the most powerful essays written to date called The Wall by Alfred A. Hambidge, Jr.. When I first read it, no words came to me to adequately describe how it made me feel, but I do think it extremely important for all of my readers to read in its entirety so that McCain aka McBush does not go onto become the next Commander in Chief.

In the meantime, here is but a snippet of this marvelous essay, “You know what really galls me? How those that seem to yell loudest for war have never seen one. They've never seen a buddy disappear from the waist up after a shell hit, then see his legs stand there for a moment before falling over. They never saw a friend all psyched up about going home tomorrow after finishing his tour get hit in the belly with shrapnel, see his guts spill out, then watch him try to gather up his intestines lying in the dirt.” In true support of our troops and veterans, all I ask is that you pass this piece onto everyone you know asking they do the same and then go out and vote.

http://www.marymacelveen.com/blog/_archives/2008/9/6/3871122.html