PDA

View Full Version : Scouts inc. on Den vs. Oak


jayman_37
09-04-2008, 03:36 PM
Scouts Take: Broncos at Raiders
By Gary Horton
Scouts Inc.
(Archive)
jayson - Subscriber since 10/14/2004Updated: September 4, 2008, 11:50 AM ET
Comment
Email
Print

US Presswire
Scouts Inc. Position Advantage

Denver has the advantage at QB WR and coaching. Raiders have everything else.

QB RB REC OL DL LB DB ST COACHING EDGE




Entering the 2008 season, do we really know these two teams like we have in the past? Denver is young and made a lot of changes on both sides of the ball, but they like what they have seen in the preseason and have a gifted young QB in Jay Cutler. Oakland has some outstanding individual players -- but can they gel as a unit? Is QB JaMarcus Russell ready to lead this team? Can the Raider defense bounce back after a bad 2007? There is a lot of questions to be answered by both teams.

When Denver has the ball
There is no mystery to Denver's offensive philosophy. The Broncos will run to set up the pass with Cutler and they run their zone blocking schemes to perfection with quick, athletic lineman. They face an Oakland run defense that underachieved and ranked next to last in 2007. The Raiders will bring their safeties and linebackers closer to the line of scrimmage in run support and put their corners on an island in pass coverage without a lot of safety help over the top. With a good early run game, Cutler will have good matchups in the passing game outside, but without his best receiver, Brandon Marshall (suspension), the ability to go deep will be problematic. Look for Cutler to utilize play-action and his ability to roll-out and bootleg could lead to some nice gains and put a lot of pressure on the Oakland defensive perimeter. Also, look for the Raiders to possibly blitz Cutler more than they have in the past.




When Oakland has the ball
The Raiders are very similar to the Broncos on offense philosophically. They want to run the ball, manage the game, and use the pass as a spin-off of the run. They have a lot of talent in their backfield with three guys that can pile up the yards -- Justin Fargas, Michael Bush, and rookie Darren McFadden -- and they may all play at the same time on some plays. Look for McFadden to be utilized as an outlet receiver for Russell and he is a nightmare matchup in space versus the Broncos linebackers. This will be a low risk pass offense, even though Russell has a big time arm, and he will get mostly single man to man coverage by Denver corners, Champ Bailey and Dre' Bly, but Denver is vulnerable versus the run (30th in rush defense in 2007). The Broncos will play a more penetrating scheme up front but the Raiders zone blocking could be very effective and Oakland can wear down this defense inside.



Matchup To Watch
Oakland RB Darren McFadden versus Denver WOLB D.J. Williams

This is a matchup that could become very intriguing, especially in the passing game. McFadden has great open field speed and moves and catches the ball very naturally out of the backfield. He is a nightmare matchup in space. He will share carries with Fargas and Bush, but on third down McFadden will have a chance to be a difference maker. Williams is an excellent athlete with speed and range and he is back at his natural WOLB spot after playing inside in 2007. He is a good pass defender with solid instincts, but he will have his hands full covering McFadden on swing passes and dump-offs.



Denver keys to success
Confuse Russell: The Raiders' offense will revolves around the run game and Russell will likely be limited to under 25 pass attempts per game. Although most of his throws will be basic and low risk, the Broncos will try to give the young signal caller a variety of looks and coverages designed to make him hesitant and hold on to the ball an extra second or two. Denver will show Russell eight defenders in the box with tight man to man schemes by CBs Bailey and Bly, which allows them more freedom to blitz. Russell may be able to attack the middle of the field versus the safeties, but Denver will try to lure him into bad throws.
Pound the rock: The Raiders will load up to try to stop Denver's running game, but the Broncos can't let that deter them from running. They still need to establish a physical ground game. The Raiders were next to last in rushing defense in 2007, but they think they have become more physical and tougher in 2008. Denver is inexperienced on the offensive line, but the talent is there and they are always adept at their zone blocking schemes. They have two good backs, Selvin Young and young Andre Hall. Young will be the primary back and Hall can be good in short yardage situations. The Broncos will stay committed to the run early in this game.

Play well on special teams: There are a lot of changes in the Broncos' kicking game in 2008 and that can be a scary proposition. They have a new kicker, Matt Prater, who has a big leg, but can he be consistent on field goals? They will have a new punter with virtually no experience. Rookie WR Eddie Royal was scheduled to return punts and kickoffs but now that he is a starter at WR, his opportunities may be limited on special teams and Hall may end up taking his place. That is a lot of change when you are facing a tough division opponent on the road in the season opener.



Oakland keys to success
Run to set up the pass: Russel is an inexperienced quarterback and the Raiders want to bring him along slowly. Right now, what they do best is control the offense with a physical rushing attack, using a zone blocking scheme with a line that has a chance to be pretty good. They have tinkered with an offensive formation that features Bush at FB with Fargas and McFadden also on the field, and it gives them a lot of flexibility. Denver will play eight in the box and single man coverages on the perimeter and Russell will get some good passing matchups if he can identify them.
More blitzing: The Raiders have blitzed a lot more in the preseason than they did in 2007. In the past they have tried to get pressure from their front four with man to man coverages on the edges, but a year ago they gave up too many big passing plays and were terrible in run defense. They will play new safety Gibril Wilson close to the line of scrimmage and let him attack, along with OLB Thomas Howard and they can play man to man on the perimeter. Denver must be aware of the Oakland blitzes.

Will the zone blocking scheme be successful? The Raiders like their zone blocking scheme under offensive line coach Tom Cable and they have talented backs to run behind it. They want to run the ball a lot and wear down defenses and they have a chance to do that versus a Bronco defensive front that is thin inside. Although the Broncos will change to a more penetrating scheme rather than read and react, the Raiders should be able to run right at them, and keep in mind that the Broncos were the 30th ranked run defense in the league last year. However, as good as this matchup looks for Oakland, remember that the Broncos' defense sees zone blocking everyday from their own offense, so they will not be surprised.




Scouts Inc. Edge
This will be a physical game as each team tries to enforce its will early. However, there are a lot of questions entering this game. We really don't know the identity of either offense and we don't know how they will perform now that the games count. Both of these defenses were awful versus the run a year ago, which is a concern considering both offenses want to run first and pass second. The only known commodity is Cutler, but he will be without his best receiver. Oakland will play it close to the vest with its own talented young QB and in a close, low-scoring game, Russell will limit mistakes and let his backs to the heavy lifting as the Raiders upset the Broncos.


Prediction

Oakland Raiders 13
Denver Broncos 10


http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/insider/news/story?id=3568337

Broncoman13
09-04-2008, 03:38 PM
The Broncos have the edge on the OL, at TE, and if things go as I expect they will, the secondary as well.

broncofan7
09-04-2008, 03:40 PM
13-10??? no way it is that low scoring--have they not watched our Preseason at all? 23-17 Denver

telluride
09-04-2008, 03:42 PM
You get the feeling that they just pull an old version of this report out of their files and change the names? There's nothing in there that indicates he knows the slightest thing about this year's Bronco team.

Blueflame
09-04-2008, 03:46 PM
Reason #1 why the '07 Broncos were vulnerable vs. the run was because we didn't have the right personnel to run Bates' defensive scheme and Bates wasn't able to make adjustments to properly utilize the personnel we did have. But Bates isn't with the '08 Broncos....

theAPAOps5
09-04-2008, 03:49 PM
This isn't a bad thing. Just let the national media bag on Denver. Makes it that much more sweeter when they win. Their Defense is good but not good enough to hold Cutler and company to 10. Plummer retired over 1 year ago now!

Popps
09-04-2008, 04:01 PM
Russel is going to make at least one big mistake in this game and Champ or Bly will make him pay for it.

Can't wait.

Ray Finkle
09-04-2008, 04:18 PM
Russel is going to make at least one big mistake in this game and Champ or Bly will make him pay for it.

Can't wait.

Did you say Steak? (insert fat lady from Deuce Bigelow)

Inkana7
09-04-2008, 04:36 PM
I'll eat my hat if Oakland holds any team to 10 points. Nonetheless us.

BroncoMan4ever
09-04-2008, 04:47 PM
these idiots really think Oakland is better than Denver in that many areas?
what will they say after Denver wins by at least 2 TD's?

Cmac821
09-04-2008, 05:10 PM
:raidsux: :bronxrox:

Cmac821
09-04-2008, 05:12 PM
off topic but I have used this site for 2 years and I don't even have 200 post I have 167. Man what's wrong with me?

oubronco
09-04-2008, 05:15 PM
:wiggle:

Cmac821
09-04-2008, 05:20 PM
Is that a fact?

oubronco
09-04-2008, 05:22 PM
:ouwknow:

Bronx33
09-04-2008, 05:29 PM
You get the feeling that they just pull an old version of this report out of their files and change the names? There's nothing in there that indicates he knows the slightest thing about this year's Bronco team.



That's exactly what i gathered from it ( copy/paste ) copy right 2007

montrose
09-04-2008, 05:49 PM
Not that I'm guaranteeing victory by any means, but I love playing the role of underdog again.

broncofan2438
09-04-2008, 06:02 PM
scouts inc = morons

colonelbeef
09-04-2008, 06:27 PM
This year is going to be so satisfying. The expectations are so absurdly low. We just have to make sure they we let the 'experts' hear about it when they are proven wrong

broncosteven
09-04-2008, 07:01 PM
off topic but I have used this site for 2 years and I don't even have 200 post I have 167. Man what's wrong with me?

You are not that CasinoRoyal guy.

Rejoice.

BlueCrusher
09-04-2008, 07:17 PM
off topic but I have used this site for 2 years and I don't even have 200 post I have 167. Man what's wrong with me?

Yeah, you're some sort of freak or something.

Paladin
09-04-2008, 07:37 PM
Thank goodness. I'm not th eonly one to not have a clue about what the score will be Monday. Apparently, neither does this turd Horton.

That name reminds me of the Cat in the Hat or Dr. Suess or something.....

Bronx33
09-04-2008, 07:38 PM
Yeah, you're some sort of freak or something.


LMAO!

Ray Finkle
09-04-2008, 07:38 PM
off topic but I have used this site for 2 years and I don't even have 200 post I have 167. Man what's wrong with me?

or it may mean you have a life...unlike Boob.

Hamrob
09-04-2008, 10:08 PM
What idiots. 10 points...how assinine is that? I don't see how Cutler finishes the game with less than 2-3 TD passes...minus Marshall.

And...I like the Raiders running game. I think our middle is alot stronger than what they're touting. I think Robinson is going to be a monster and Thomas is going to be improved as well. Yes, we will have 8 men in the box...and I'll take DJ all day against the Rookie!

Does anyone really think that Russell is going to pick apart Bly and Champ? Come on! Now switch...Cutler on their fine secondary? I'm a homer...but Cutler will throw the ball on ANYBODY in this league.

34-17 Denver...write it down!

Hamrob
09-04-2008, 10:10 PM
Heck...Mike Shanahan could score 10 points alone against this lame-a$$ team!

Raidersbane
09-04-2008, 10:16 PM
I see us scoring more than 10 points in the first quarter......what a great scouting report..

BroncoDoug
09-04-2008, 11:17 PM
What idiots. 10 points...how assinine is that? I don't see how Cutler finishes the game with less than 2-3 TD passes...minus Marshall.

And...I like the Raiders running game. I think our middle is alot stronger than what they're touting. I think Robinson is going to be a monster and Thomas is going to be improved as well. Yes, we will have 8 men in the box...and I'll take DJ all day against the Rookie!

Does anyone really think that Russell is going to pick apart Bly and Champ? Come on! Now switch...Cutler on their fine secondary? I'm a homer...but Cutler will throw the ball on ANYBODY in this league.

34-17 Denver...write it down!

I just wrote down 34-17, now i'm going to wake up tomorrow and wonder wth 34-17 means and throw it away...

Broncos4Life
09-05-2008, 04:07 AM
You get the feeling that they just pull an old version of this report out of their files and change the names? There's nothing in there that indicates he knows the slightest thing about this year's Bronco team.

You know Tellrude, what bothers me is that these douche bags don't give Cutler any respect. They make it sound like because Marshall is gone that we won't throw the ball and that Jay will have to manage the game a la Jake Plummer. This sounds like the same scouting report we had every year when Jake was our QB. No F'n way is chokeland holding us to 10:rofl:. Are you freaking kidding me? We are not going into oak to play conservative 2004 run the ball offense. It just looks like this scout report was copied and pasted from about 4 years ago. Run, run, play action boot. Sorry espin. Cutler will throw from the pocket. And he will find open receivers. Oh how I would love if we came out throwin first!

watermock
09-05-2008, 04:26 AM
23 points? With these defenses? Double it and you'll be closer

Atwater His Ass
09-05-2008, 04:34 AM
vegas has the over/under 41-42 points.

this game could be a lot of things, but 13-10 isn't one of them.

MOCRUSH
09-05-2008, 04:56 AM
Yeah, you're some sort of freak or something.

Must be a "Crush" thing.

BroncoInferno
09-05-2008, 06:13 AM
Denver is going to have an explosive offense this season. That "10" prediction will look laughable in a few days.

theAPAOps5
09-05-2008, 06:18 AM
Scouts Inc isn't the only ones counting Denver out. 4 of the 6 CBS Sportsline's "experts" pick Oakland to win.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks

Broncos_OTM
09-05-2008, 06:51 AM
What idiots. 10 points...how assinine is that? I don't see how Cutler finishes the game with less than 2-3 TD passes...minus Marshall.

And...I like the Raiders running game. I think our middle is alot stronger than what they're touting. I think Robinson is going to be a monster and Thomas is going to be improved as well. Yes, we will have 8 men in the box...and I'll take DJ all day against the Rookie!

Does anyone really think that Russell is going to pick apart Bly and Champ? Come on! Now switch...Cutler on their fine secondary? I'm a homer...but Cutler will throw the ball on ANYBODY in this league.

34-17 Denver...write it down!
I dont know if we read the same article. but they said they would run heavy on us. which i aggree they will. and i think they may even see some sucess at it. but no where did i read that russell will pick us apart. because its true if they can run on us the pass will be there.. just like this summer so far we got picked apart by some mediocre qbs

Broncos_OTM
09-05-2008, 06:51 AM
Denver is going to have an explosive offense this season. That "10" prediction will look laughable in a few days.

i aggree but with out marshall it could be more of a dud.

Broncos_OTM
09-05-2008, 06:54 AM
You know Tellrude, what bothers me is that these douche bags don't give Cutler any respect. They make it sound like because Marshall is gone that we won't throw the ball and that Jay will have to manage the game a la Jake Plummer. This sounds like the same scouting report we had every year when Jake was our QB. No F'n way is chokeland holding us to 10:rofl:. Are you freaking kidding me? We are not going into oak to play conservative 2004 run the ball offense. It just looks like this scout report was copied and pasted from about 4 years ago. Run, run, play action boot. Sorry espin. Cutler will throw from the pocket. And he will find open receivers. Oh how I would love if we came out throwin first!

Marshall is HUGE for this offense it allows the other team to double him posting single covreage for royal. and opens the run game with out him it should simply things for oakland. not to mention but for the most part royal is still a unkown quanity. he had a great catch this preason but i also see a play where he ran the wrong route. and had a step or two. excpect alittle more of taht until he gets evreything udner his belt

Kaylore
09-05-2008, 07:03 AM
Scouts Inc isn't the only ones counting Denver out. 4 of the 6 CBS Sportsline's "experts" pick Oakland to win.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks

Madden picked us to win! And half of them took KC over NE.

Our offense struggled to score last year and our rush defense was so bad we never got any opportunities. The first week is the hardest to predict because nobody knows what a team is going to look like. It's all a crap shoot. Having said that, provided we aren't suffering from the season opener poop effect that we have in season's past (Plummer not playing will help) we should do better this year. I like our offensive line. Missing Marshall is going to hurt a lot of what we can do, though.

BroncoBen
09-05-2008, 07:04 AM
You get the feeling that they just pull an old version of this report out of their files and change the names? There's nothing in there that indicates he knows the slightest thing about this year's Bronco team.

Much less the Raiders... I agree on your take they just pulled this old report and posted it as new... idiots.

Irish Stout
09-05-2008, 07:17 AM
These Scout Inc. people sure seem smart. I must believe them and not what I previoulsy have seen with my own eyes. I must have been confused, because I thought we were making a change in on our offense from run dominated to pass dominated, you know, now that we have a great QB and some good O-line protection... but I guess I am wrong. I guess we'll just run, run, run, and then not convert on third and not score in the redzone this year.

Has anyone actually seen Cutler do a bootleg in pre-season?

I would give a prediction, but I am too confused... Madden picked us? More confusion... Whatever Suckland scores, I say we score double that and add 7.

Broncos_OTM
09-05-2008, 07:21 AM
All i got to say fellas is that Oakland beat us once last year. almost twice if shanny hadnt called the TO

Were minus Marshall this year..

While oakland added Javon Walker who when healthy is a beast and Deangelo Hall who is a upgrade at CB for them

theAPAOps5
09-05-2008, 07:22 AM
Remember Oakland was worse than Denver against the run last year. Denver really only needs to score 10 points. Their offense is that bad. Reports this morning are Jawhaaaaan's hamstring is getting worse so he may not even play!

Broncos_OTM
09-05-2008, 07:43 AM
Remember Oakland was worse than Denver against the run last year. Denver really only needs to score 10 points. Their offense is that bad. Reports this morning are Jawhaaaaan's hamstring is getting worse so he may not even play!

by what two spots. werent we 29th? granted marcus thomas looks better and so robertson looks stout. i picked denver 17 - 7 but all i am sying is that Oakland will give us a game

broncofan2438
09-05-2008, 08:08 AM
Scouts Inc isn't the only ones counting Denver out. 4 of the 6 CBS Sportsline's "experts" pick Oakland to win.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks

I like it, keep the retarted media coming

2KBack
09-05-2008, 08:15 AM
Deangelo Hall who is a upgrade at CB for them

I think that's debatable, Atlanta was so high on Hall they traded him and have since essentially replaced him with Foxworth.

Haroldthebarrel
09-05-2008, 10:10 AM
A quick search yields that oakland at home has held an opponent to 10 points or less three times the last three years. (I didnt double check).
The last time was a 22-9 win over the Cardinals with Leinhart throwing two interceptions and without Fitzgerald.

We have scored 10 or less away two times last year vs the Lions, Chargers.
Vs Kansas city and STL in 2006 and vs the Dolphins in 2005.
Of note is that we have not scored ten or less points five times in away matches the last three years and two of those were in the opening match.
So maybe there is an offshot chance of this happening afterall.

Still, I dont believe that we would score ten points or less with what we have shown the last eight games of last year with preseason matches.
We have just been too good.
And I dont think they did the research I did to base it, which incidently would be a very poor research to do on a single football game(imho).

Kaylore
09-05-2008, 10:16 AM
Reports this morning are Jawhaaaaan's hamstring is getting worse so he may not even play!

He's scared. I bet there's nothing wrong with his hammy.

theAPAOps5
09-05-2008, 10:17 AM
He's scared. I bet there's nothing wrong with his hammy.

I was thinking the same thing. He cocked off about Javon beating Javons old team and now he can't back it up. I would fake a hammy too.

Denver Crush
09-05-2008, 10:31 AM
Must be a "Crush" thing.

I think you may be on to something.

Irish Stout
09-05-2008, 10:43 AM
Has anyone actually seen Cutler do a bootleg in pre-season?

Yes I am quoting myself. So I am sitting here at work, going through a real estate contract and all of a sudden in my mind I remember seeing Cutler rolling out to the right on Green Bay. I smile. I sigh. I think "ahhhh Broncos."

Then it hits me. I'm a retard.

Ugly Duck
09-05-2008, 11:04 AM
Although I'm encouraged by the kind words about Oakland, my enthusiam is somewhat tempered by a nagging suspicion that the author may not know what he's talking about. Suff like indentifying Thomas Howard as a key to Raider success, but he's not even on the team any more. He's been cut from the roster since the 75 player deadline.

http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Arizona+Cardinals+v+Oakland+Raiders+OIYML2LWE_Dl.j pg

kappys
09-05-2008, 11:12 AM
Reason #1 why the '07 Broncos were vulnerable vs. the run was because we didn't have the right personnel to run Bates' defensive scheme and Bates wasn't able to make adjustments to properly utilize the personnel we did have. But Bates isn't with the '08 Broncos....

I don't care who your coordinator is you trot out the kind of trash we had last year at LB and D-line and noone could turn those guys into a decent run defense.

Hopefully it will be better this year - but I'm not convinced. Still I think the overall group of starters is better even if the backups suck and I expect with the heavy focus on stopping the run to be a little more effective. If Oakland runs some misdirections or counters though they will get some big yards.

Hamrob
09-05-2008, 02:35 PM
I dont know if we read the same article. but they said they would run heavy on us. which i aggree they will. and i think they may even see some sucess at it. but no where did i read that russell will pick us apart. because its true if they can run on us the pass will be there.. just like this summer so far we got picked apart by some mediocre qbsI wasn't making my commentary based solely on the specifics of his article. I was simply stating, that they're not going to be able to pass effectively against our secondary and we will bring 8 men up to the line of scrimmage to squelch their running game. Conversely, they may be able to stop our RB's (initially)...but they won't be able to slow Cuter down (provided he isn't too excited...he's still young). BMarsh is a huge weapon for us...but we have alot of weapons. In fact I like everyone of our receivers and we have three exceptional TE's with a host of quick RB's who can catch the ball. To think they will hold us to 10 points is pure stupidity!

rovolution
09-05-2008, 02:37 PM
Although I'm encouraged by the kind words about Oakland, my enthusiam is somewhat tempered by a nagging suspicion that the author may not know what he's talking about. Suff like indentifying Thomas Howard as a key to Raider success, but he's not even on the team any more. He's been cut from the roster since the 75 player deadline.

http://www3.pictures.gi.zimbio.com/Arizona+Cardinals+v+Oakland+Raiders+OIYML2LWE_Dl.j pg

thomas howard is still a raider dude.

and why in the world would he be cut? he had 6 INTs last season as a freaking LB.

Edit: UglyDuck is a Faide fan my bad. Jamanboobs will be a draft bust Ugly.

Atwater His Ass
09-05-2008, 02:48 PM
thomas howard is still a raider dude.

and why in the world would he be cut? he had 6 INTs last season as a freaking LB.


typical bandwagon Charger fans and their limited knowledge of league happenings.


are you going to start pulling our your Raider gear from the 80s-90s-early 2000s when Ladanian retires?

lol

snowspot66
09-05-2008, 04:27 PM
I don't care who your coordinator is you trot out the kind of trash we had last year at LB and D-line and noone could turn those guys into a decent run defense.

Hopefully it will be better this year - but I'm not convinced. Still I think the overall group of starters is better even if the backups suck and I expect with the heavy focus on stopping the run to be a little more effective. If Oakland runs some misdirections or counters though they will get some big yards.

Yeah our guys on D weren't and still really aren't worth bragging about but don't underestimate the impact of the scheme. Those first 6 or 7 games were atrocious. When we ditched the scheme the run D still wasn't great but it was much improved. I would go so far as to say it was borderline average after the switch. If half the season hadn't been spent on that ****ty scheme that we couldn't play I think we are in the 14-20 range in Run D.

broncofan2438
09-05-2008, 04:39 PM
Whats the deal with Javon? Is he playing or not?

AZBroncomaniac
09-05-2008, 04:59 PM
Whats the deal with Javon? Is he playing or not?

I haven't seen anything specific stating that he won't play. I for one certainly hope he does play. When he doesn't start getting the ball in the first game of the season, either because the Fade want to run, or Tubby just can't get him the ball, then the team erosion will begin. The virus known as Javon will be planted, and it's all downhill for the Fade.

Atlas
09-05-2008, 10:21 PM
Scouts Inc isn't the only ones counting Denver out. 4 of the 6 CBS Sportsline's "experts" pick Oakland to win.

http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/features/writers/expert/picks

That's against the spread. Denver is favored by 2.5 points. Even up maybe they might select Denver.

BroncoMan4ever
09-05-2008, 10:41 PM
What idiots. 10 points...how assinine is that? I don't see how Cutler finishes the game with less than 2-3 TD passes...minus Marshall.

And...I like the Raiders running game. I think our middle is alot stronger than what they're touting. I think Robinson is going to be a monster and Thomas is going to be improved as well. Yes, we will have 8 men in the box...and I'll take DJ all day against the Rookie!

Does anyone really think that Russell is going to pick apart Bly and Champ? Come on! Now switch...Cutler on their fine secondary? I'm a homer...but Cutler will throw the ball on ANYBODY in this league.

34-17 Denver...write it down!

hell if Cutler played for another team(thank god he doesn't) he would throw at Champ and not be timid about it. he would play Champ as just another corner in the league and not worry about the outcome of that matchup.

that is one thing i love about Jay, he will take chances and more often than not they pay off. but when he does make a mistake he lets it roll off him and makes up for it later in the game. not many QB's have that ability.

Atlas
09-06-2008, 01:24 AM
hell if Cutler played for another team(thank god he doesn't) he would throw at Champ and not be timid about it. he would play Champ as just another corner in the league and not worry about the outcome of that matchup.

that is one thing i love about Jay, he will take chances and more often than not they pay off. but when he does make a mistake he lets it roll off him and makes up for it later in the game. not many QB's have that ability.

I would hope Cutler would be smart enough to avoid Champ.

ZONA
09-06-2008, 02:55 AM
I'll eat my hat if Oakland holds any team to 10 points. Nonetheless us.

How true - that alone was a completely insane view of the writer. Now throw in there that Jay is feeling alot better and really looks sharp, and that our OL really is pass blocking great. Bmarsh sitting out will no doubt probably cost us some points so it won't be a barn burner but 10 points - what a joke.

Spider
09-06-2008, 06:34 AM
real simple , Keys to the game .....
Score more points ;D
I think we see the return of the pitch , Broncos should stretch this Raider D early and often , without Brandon this will be tough , I saw some things from Royal this preseason , that I likes ( out of the clips of games got to see )
.....
On Defense stack 8 in the box , force Demarcus what his face to beat us , Make Jokeland play the short yardage game,I.E. 5-8 yard passing routes ....... D.E. of the Denver broncs STAY HOME.....I wouldnt count to much on seeing Boss Bailey , looks like winborn will start , he has to be disciplined in his gap responsibilities and for Petes sake stay out of the wash .........
Keys for Jokeland ...... ****em they get no keys

CasinoRoyal
09-06-2008, 10:14 AM
I dont think Shanny wantas to "manage" games anymore.....

I think we al have seen way to many 14 point leads blown......

This year since we CAN score at will ill rather take the patriots route and dump 50 on everybody...