PDA

View Full Version : Things that would be on TeeVee 24/7 if a Democrat did them...


L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-09-2008, 01:53 AM
1. John McCain got Bud Day, one of the "Swift Boat Veterans for Truth" who spent most of 2004 intentionally lying about John Kerry's service record to prevent Kerry from being elected president, to attack Gen. Wesley Clark and Sen. Jim Webb for mentioning the incredibly obvious facts that:

*John McCain deserves respect for the enormous sacrifice he made for this country, regardless of why he did it

*Nonetheless, John McCain's military career was not a stellar one:

He graudated in the bottom 0.6% of his Naval Academy class. As Wikipedia puts it (with citations):

McCain had conflicts with higher-ups, and he was disinclined to obey every rule, which contributed to a low class rank (894 of 899) that he did not aim to improve. McCain did well in academic subjects that interested him, such as literature and history, but studied only enough to pass subjects he disliked, such as math.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_mccain


Ignorance of areas he doesn't like and refusal to follow the rules pretty much define McCain's life.

After entering full-time naval aviation service, he crashed two planes and ran a third one into power lines.

He got shot down over Vietnam in October 1967, but of course that's not a sign of a bad pilot. Unlike other POWs, he received medical care because his father, Admiral John S. McCain, was an important US military leader who, in mid-1968, was named commander of all US forces in the Vietnam theater. While McCain refused an offer of early release for propaganda purposes ("the North Vietnamese … wanted to show other POWs that elites like McCain were willing to be treated preferentially"), he did crack under torture and signed an anti-American "confession" that he would not otherwise have signed:

McCain slowly wrote, "I am a black criminal and I have performed the deeds of an air pirate. I almost died and the Vietnamese people saved my life, thanks to the doctors."

This makes McCain's current support for torturing prisoners in US custody all the more repellent.

Upon release from Vietnam, McCain turned around an underperforming Navy flight squadron and served as the Navy's liason to the US Senate, but was not going to advance like his father had, as Wikipedia summarizes:

McCain decided to leave the Navy. He was unlikely to ever make full admiral, as he had poor annual physicals and had been given no major sea command. In early 1981, he was told he would be made rear admiral; he declined the prospect, as he already made plans to run for Congress and said he could "do more good there."

Most Naval officers never make admiral or read admiral, and their service, like McCain's, is still a great honor to this country and worthy of all the praise it receives. Even a bad soldier deserves his country's respect and support for his willingness to serve and sacrifice, and there's no evidence McCain was a bad servicemember. He just wasn't the stellar kind that would take him to the top. These are facts, not attacks.

2. McCain's decision to enter politics was backed by the finances of his new wife. His first wife, who supported him throughout his captivity, was in a disfiguring car accident in 1969, one McCain never knew about until he was released. He began cheating on his crippled wife in 1976 or 1977, and stared the affair with his current wife, Cindy Lou (Hensley) McCain, before he and his first wife separated and he sought a divorce. McCain takes responsibility for these actions, but I seem to recall that Bill Clinton taking "responsibility" for his in the same way didn't seem to satisfy the media in the slightest.

3. None of this would have worked for McCain had he not been able to get out of his first marriage so he could use his second wife's money to finance his first run for Congress. His divorce attorney, who helped make it all possible, was a fellow former Navy veteran who was also a Vietnam POW, and who saw McCain in the hospital at his lowest point, when they were all convinced he was about to die.

Who was that attorney and decades-long friend of McCain? George "Bud" Day, the same "Swift Boat" liar that McCain's campaign brought out to claim that stating the facts about McCain's military career, and the fact that being a POW does not automatically qualify you for the presidency, was an attack on McCain.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/mccain/articles/0301mccainbio-chapter3.html

4. McCain criticized the "Swift Boat" campaign in 2004 and called for it to stop, yet despite his own personal power as an influential member of the US Senate, a former presidential candidate, a media darling, and someone on John Kerry's short list for the Democratic vice-presidential nomination, McCain appears to have done nothing to tell his decades-long friend "Bud" Day to lay off, to stop lying, and to disown the group.

Either McCain didn't really object to the group's attacks after all, or he was simply unable to exercise any leadership or control over people that he should easily have been able to influence by the threat of public personal denunciation.

5. This week, John McCain's campaign is attacking Barack Obama's campaign by saying that Obama can't control people he should easily be able to influence.

If the parties were reversed, and the Democratic candidate had this military career (like Kerry did) and the Republicans were the ones saying it wasn't an automatic qualifier for the Oval Office, he would be lambasted on CNN, MSNBC, and especially FOX News, every day, every show, every hour, for the next two months.

Not so much when the Republican candidate does it.

Also, if a Democratic candidate for president made constant mention of his time as a POW in campaign materials and commercials, but then continually let his surrogates claim that he "never talks about it," they'd be having a 24/7 wankfest over that, too. With John McCain, not so much.

http://friends.macjournals.com/mattd/2008/07/02#a1924

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-10-2008, 10:25 PM
http://www.bartcop.com/gywo_outward_bound.gif

That One Guy
07-10-2008, 11:31 PM
Nobody should ever be knocked for anything they do under torture. Period. It was enough that he was able to resist preferential treatment, whoopty doo that he signed something confessing his own guilt. The Code of Conduct gets people killed, it's not a realistic way to make it through captivity. You spend 7 years (or whatever it was) in captivity and you're going to break on some level.

His service record is fine. So he didn't follow every rule... at least he didn't quit. One could infer that maybe he had a terrible record at the school but daddy pulled strings... no way of knowing. I don't know if that's what they're implying but to basically sum him up as "he was a trouble maker"... well, who cares. All work and no play...

The crashing planes being put in here is rediculous and reaching for something to bash him on. That should have never been brought up.

As for the divorcing his first wife... that's hard to say. It's the romantic concept to think you'd be there for them forever until death do you part kinda thing but... that's a personal decision. I'd like to think I could do it for my wife but there's just no way of knowing. Again, I don't think he can be knocked on that... especially considering the burden that would be following what he'd just been through. If he were merely moving on for the money of the new wife though, that should definitely be mentioned. No way of knowing what his reasoning was though, he'd never admit to the latter.

I coulda sworn Mccain was against torture in Gitmo?

This sounds like a reach and in the world of today's politics, it seems like they should have much more substance at their fingertips. Mccain is fairly clean if this is the best they could come up with.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-11-2008, 12:22 AM
Nobody should ever be knocked for anything they do under torture. Period. It was enough that he was able to resist preferential treatment, whoopty doo that he signed something confessing his own guilt. The Code of Conduct gets people killed, it's not a realistic way to make it through captivity. You spend 7 years (or whatever it was) in captivity and you're going to break on some level.

His service record is fine. So he didn't follow every rule... at least he didn't quit. One could infer that maybe he had a terrible record at the school but daddy pulled strings... no way of knowing. I don't know if that's what they're implying but to basically sum him up as "he was a trouble maker"... well, who cares. All work and no play...

The crashing planes being put in here is rediculous and reaching for something to bash him on. That should have never been brought up.

As for the divorcing his first wife... that's hard to say. It's the romantic concept to think you'd be there for them forever until death do you part kinda thing but... that's a personal decision. I'd like to think I could do it for my wife but there's just no way of knowing. Again, I don't think he can be knocked on that... especially considering the burden that would be following what he'd just been through. If he were merely moving on for the money of the new wife though, that should definitely be mentioned. No way of knowing what his reasoning was though, he'd never admit to the latter.

I coulda sworn Mccain was against torture in Gitmo?

This sounds like a reach and in the world of today's politics, it seems like they should have much more substance at their fingertips. Mccain is fairly clean if this is the best they could come up with.

Funny how John Kerry's military service was fair game when he was running for president (Swift Boats Vets and purple band-aids, anyone?) but Wes Clark gets hammered by the mainstream media for stating the obviouis about McCain, i.e., that McSame's military service and his experience as POW doesn't necessarily mean he'd be a good president.

"Liberal" media my ass!

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-11-2008, 12:28 AM
His service record is fine.

???

You call graduating in the bottom 0.6% of your Naval Academy class, crashing two planes and running a third one into power lines, and a pattern of conflict with your superiors "fine?"

Mccain is fairly clean if this is the best they could come up with.

The article only scratched the surface - there are many more skeletons in McSame's closet.

I coulda sworn Mccain was against torture in Gitmo?

He was against it before he was for it.

(Or was it the other way around?)

:D

BABronco
07-11-2008, 01:21 AM
???

You call graduating in the bottom 0.6% of your Naval Academy class, crashing two planes and running a third one into power lines, and a pattern of conflict with your superiors "fine?"



The article only scratched the surface - there are many more skeletons in McSame's closet.



He was against it before he was for it.

(Or was it the other way around?)

:D

You never know with these Aholes... i guess its who they talk to that day

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-11-2008, 01:26 AM
<center> http://www.bartcop.com/mccain-pole-vault.jpg
</center>

That One Guy
07-11-2008, 02:29 AM
???

You call graduating in the bottom 0.6% of your Naval Academy class, crashing two planes and running a third one into power lines, and a pattern of conflict with your superiors "fine?"



The article only scratched the surface - there are many more skeletons in McSame's closet.



He was against it before he was for it.

(Or was it the other way around?)

:D

Graduating a service academy (unless daddy pulled strings) is no small feat, whether you did it at the top or bottom of your class. Sure, it looks better to be at the top but it's better to be the bottom of the graduates than the top of the failures.

On the planes, I knew 2 crews personally as a boy that crashed their helicopters... 1 of the crews was killed. Accidents happen. Now, obviously this part is moot without the details surrounding the wrecks as only Brandon Marshall is in the wrong place at the wrong time 3 times in a row... but it's possible Mccain shares his bad luck. I'm just giving Mccain the benefit of the doubt here, I guess. Making assumptions that he wasn't at fault just as some would assume he was. Again, without details, who knows.

I just don't see why if he had all these other skeletons available, why do they have to attack a man's military service? That should be something you can look back on with pride, no matter what. They continually say something to that effect but continue on to knock it.

As for the Kerry thing, I'm still amazed they were able to drag him through the mud by his purple hearts like they did. The biggest thing I remember, and I didn't follow it too awful close then either, was that he was being accused of hoarding purple hearts to avoid combat. Getting grazed on the butt by a round but not injured comes to mind? My stance continues to be on this election that if they could take Kerry and smear him like they did, I think they'll have a heyday with Obama when the time comes.

That's probably true on the torture thing, I just remember a sound bite where he was talking about how he was a POW and he doesn't want to see anyone else tortured... but I faintly recall him being pro it at one point as well, so I think you're right.

Just, ultimately, it doesn't seem like any of these are the big deal that the article title would've made one believe it should be.

L.A. BRONCOS FAN
07-11-2008, 02:41 AM
I just don't see why if he had all these other skeletons available, why do they have to attack a man's military service? That should be something you can look back on with pride, no matter what. They continually say something to that effect but continue on to knock it.


The author prefaced the article with this statement:

John McCain deserves respect for the enormous sacrifice he made for this country, regardless of why he did it

Then, he goes on to say Nonetheless, John McCain's military career was not a stellar one:

These two statements are not incompatible.