kmonty
04-28-2008, 06:54 AM
I always thought the swapping of 6th rounders by the Chiefs and Vikings for the Allen trade was odd. Peter King explains in latest MMQB (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/writers/peter_king/04/27/mmqb.draft/2.html):
Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me
If you're a nerdy/curious guy like me, and you saw the terms of the Kansas City-Minnesota trade for Allen last week, one weird thing stuck out.
The trade: The Chiefs sent Allen and a sixth-round pick (187th overall), to Minnesota for a first-round pick (17th), two third-rounders (73rd and 82nd) and a sixth (182nd).
The weirdness: Why the totally insignificant swap of sixth-rounders?
"Because I wanted to get the real value according to our trade chart,'' said Peterson, "and with only the one and two threes, we were a few points short.''
The draft trade chart -- some teams use it, some think it's outdated -- provides a point value for each of the 252 picks in the draft. When Team A is trading with Team B, often Team A's general manager will consult the chart to see if he's getting the correct value in the deal.
In this trade, Peterson wanted Minnesota's first- and second-round picks. Minnesota's first, the 17th overall, is worth 950 points on the chart; the second rounder, 47th overall, is worth 430. That is 1,380 points of value on the chart.
Minnesota offered instead to trade the 17th (950 points), 73rd (225) and 82nd (180). That's 1,355 points of value on the chart.
The two teams were 25 points apart. So Peterson, just wanting anything to narrow the gap in his mind, settled for a swap of sixth-rounders. The 182nd pick is worth 19.6 points, the 187th pick valued at 17.6.
So Peterson, a nut for the trade chart, got two points closer to his goal of an even trade.
Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me
If you're a nerdy/curious guy like me, and you saw the terms of the Kansas City-Minnesota trade for Allen last week, one weird thing stuck out.
The trade: The Chiefs sent Allen and a sixth-round pick (187th overall), to Minnesota for a first-round pick (17th), two third-rounders (73rd and 82nd) and a sixth (182nd).
The weirdness: Why the totally insignificant swap of sixth-rounders?
"Because I wanted to get the real value according to our trade chart,'' said Peterson, "and with only the one and two threes, we were a few points short.''
The draft trade chart -- some teams use it, some think it's outdated -- provides a point value for each of the 252 picks in the draft. When Team A is trading with Team B, often Team A's general manager will consult the chart to see if he's getting the correct value in the deal.
In this trade, Peterson wanted Minnesota's first- and second-round picks. Minnesota's first, the 17th overall, is worth 950 points on the chart; the second rounder, 47th overall, is worth 430. That is 1,380 points of value on the chart.
Minnesota offered instead to trade the 17th (950 points), 73rd (225) and 82nd (180). That's 1,355 points of value on the chart.
The two teams were 25 points apart. So Peterson, just wanting anything to narrow the gap in his mind, settled for a swap of sixth-rounders. The 182nd pick is worth 19.6 points, the 187th pick valued at 17.6.
So Peterson, a nut for the trade chart, got two points closer to his goal of an even trade.
