View Full Version : Burning Bronco question No. 1: The secondary
oubronco
02-21-2008, 10:36 AM
http://www.realfootball365.com/nfl/articles/21308.html
Atwater His Ass
02-21-2008, 10:38 AM
It's not worth talking about the secondary until we fix the DL.
Borks147
02-21-2008, 10:41 AM
I stopped reading after he said that we didn't have depth behind Bly and Bailey
Gcver2ver3
02-21-2008, 10:43 AM
I stopped reading after he said that we didn't have depth behind Bly and Bailey
ditto...
vancejohnson82
02-21-2008, 10:44 AM
yea... a lot of those pass numbers are inflated because we had 8,9,10 guys in the box half of the time to try and control the run
abdullah will improve this year, lynch, if around, can take 1/2 of the snaps or play as a specialty safety...and was ferguson even mentioned in that article?
vancejohnson82
02-21-2008, 10:45 AM
I stopped reading after he said that we didn't have depth behind Bly and Bailey
realfootball365.com is always posting on craigslist looking for writers.....not surprisingly you sometimes get faulty information or whack opinions on there....they are freelancers doing work for free
Broncos4Life
02-21-2008, 10:47 AM
It's not worth talking about the secondary until we fix the DL.
Yeah, what a waste of an article. I'm not gonna even go there. We all know why the secondary looked mediocre last season: We couldn't stop the rush. And Jim Bates of course.
Why not cover the DL position?
Orange_Beard
02-21-2008, 12:05 PM
Wtf?