PDA

View Full Version : Religion vs Science


spdirty
11-29-2007, 11:12 PM
Got this in an email. Figured I'd share. Fun read.



"Let me explain the problem science has with religion." The atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand.

"You're a Christian, aren't you, son?"

"Yes sir," the student says.

"So you believe in God?"

"Absolutely."

"Is God good?"

"Sure! God's good."

"Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?"

"Yes."

"Are you good or evil?"

"The Bible says I'm evil."

The professor grins knowingly. "Aha! The Bible!" He considers for a moment. "Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?"

"Yes sir, I would."

"So you're good...!"

"I wouldn't say that."

"But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't."

The student does not answer, so the professor continues. "He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Hmmm? Can you answer that one?"

The student remains silent.

"No, you can't, can you?" the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax.

"Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?"

"Er...yes," the student says.

"Is Satan good?"

The student doesn't hesitate on this one. "No."

"Then where does Satan come from?"

The student falters. "From God"

"That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?"

"Yes, sir."

"Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?"

"Yes."

"So who created evil?" The professor continued, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil."

Again, the student has no answer. "Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?"

The student squirms on his feet. "Yes."

"So who created them?"

The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. "Who created them?" There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. "Tell me," he continues onto another student. "Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?"

The student's voice betrays him and cracks. "Yes, professor, I do."

The old man stops pacing. "Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?"

"No sir. I've never seen Him."

"Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?"

"No, sir, I have not."

"Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?"

"No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't."

"Yet you still believe in him?"

"Yes."

"According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist. What do you say to that, son?"

"Nothing," the student replies. "I only have my faith."

"Yes, faith," the professor repeats. "And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith."

The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own. "Professor, is there such thing as heat?"

"Yes," the professor replies. "There's heat."

"And is there such a thing as cold?"

"Yes, son, there's cold too."

"No sir, there isn't."

The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. "You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit up to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees."

"Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it."

Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.

"What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?"

"Yes," the professor replies without hesitation. "What is night if it isn't darkness?"

"You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word."

"In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?"

The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. "So what point are you making, young man?"

"Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed."

The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. "Flawed? Can you explain how?"

"You are working on the premise of duality," the student explains. "You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought."

"It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it."

"Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?"

"If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do."

"Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?"

The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.

"Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?"

The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided.

"To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean."

The student looks around the room. "Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?" The class breaks out into laughter.

"Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir."

"So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"

Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.

Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. "I guess you'll have to take them on faith."

"Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life," the student continues. "Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?"

Now uncertain, the professor responds, "Of course, there is. We see it everyday. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil."

To this the student replied, "Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light."

The professor sat down.

yavoon
11-29-2007, 11:14 PM
I got 10$ on science.

Spider
11-29-2007, 11:30 PM
cant have cold ? what about a deep freezer ? this is a unit that is built to keep heat out .. what about Propane ? Even see that stuff ?
I seen a German Shepard get blasted in the face , they had to put the dog to sleep ...... no such thing as cold only the absent of heat ?

TheDave
11-30-2007, 12:03 AM
Which god... just askin' ;D

AlphaOmega
11-30-2007, 12:30 AM
:thumbsup:

Bob
11-30-2007, 01:00 AM
Here we go again....

Bronco Bob
11-30-2007, 01:12 AM
Just another variation of the Einstein vs the atheist professor urban legend.

http://www.snopes.com/religion/einstein.asp

spdirty
11-30-2007, 01:34 AM
Just another variation of the Einstein vs the atheist professor urban legend.

http://www.snopes.com/religion/einstein.asp

good stuff on there...when I read it I thought it was a fictional story, didn't know they originally tried to play it off as factual and Einstein being the student.

Rohirrim
11-30-2007, 11:13 AM
Yeah. Who needs science when you've got religion: http://www.intriguing.com/mp/_pictures/grail/large/HolyGrail028.jpg
"Does she weigh the same as a duck?"

defenseman
11-30-2007, 11:22 AM
I enjoyed that spdirty. Keep them coming...dman

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 12:50 PM
"Science" has participated in its fair share of atrocities as well. Human experimentation is the first to come to mind. The atomic bomb is another. Abortion seems to be the most opposed current example.

Attributing human evil to "religion" is a fruitless exercise that really doesnt approach the issue with anything of value.

Hotrod
11-30-2007, 01:05 PM
Personally I dont see why Science and Religion have to argue. Cant they work together???

Whey does evolution have to scare the religious people. Is it not possible that the ever growing evolution of man and beast is part of Gods plan. I mean it actually would give even more praise to God if he was the one who created life on earth that was able to change/improve.

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 01:07 PM
Personally I dont see why Science and Religion have to argue. Cant they work together???

Whey does evolution have to scare the religious people. Is it not possible that the ever growing evolution of man and beast is part of Gods plan. I mean it actually would give even more praise to God if he was the one who created life on earth that was able to change/improve.

Well..that's the thing. They really DO NOT have to stand at opposition.

However, both sides of the argument are completely uneducated on the other. I have found the world of science to be even more ignorant than the world of faith.

Garcia Bronco
11-30-2007, 01:14 PM
"Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?"

Nice little read...but micro-evolution is observable. Further more the 4 sciences have never proven there is no God. Because we don't know what we don't know. I guess it's true...True knowledge is knowing that you know nothing. :)

Garcia Bronco
11-30-2007, 01:16 PM
cant have cold ? what about a deep freezer ? this is a unit that is built to keep heat out .. what about Propane ? Even see that stuff ?
I seen a German Shepard get blasted in the face , they had to put the dog to sleep ...... no such thing as cold only the absent of heat ?

The student is correct in the article....but it's only a point of view. The measurment of thermal units is measuring heat...not cold.

defenseman
11-30-2007, 01:21 PM
Intersting article on the pope and his latest address:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071130/wl_nm/pope_encyclical_dc
..dman

Papal encyclical attacks atheism, lauds hope By Philip Pullella
2 hours, 48 minutes ago



VATICAN CITY (Reuters) - Pope Benedict, in an encyclical released on Friday, said atheism was responsible for some of the "greatest forms of cruelty and violations of justice" in history.

ADVERTISEMENT


The 75-page "Spe Salvi," which takes its Latin title from a quote by St Paul (in hope we were saved), is an appeal to a pessimistic world to find strength in Christian hope.

In the second encyclical of his papacy, Benedict urges Christians to put their hope for the future in God and not in technology, wealth or political ideologies.

Atheism could be regarded by some as a "type of moralism," particularly in the 19th and 20th centuries, to protest against the injustices of the world and world history, he said.

Reciting arguments made by atheists, he said: "A world marked by so much injustice, innocent suffering and cynicism of power cannot be the work of a good God. A God with responsibility for such a world would not be a just God, much less a good God."

History has proven wrong ideologies such as Marxism which say humans had to establish social justice because God did not exist, the Pope wrote.

"It is no accident that this idea has led to the greatest forms of cruelty and violations of justice," the Pope said. Such a concept was grounded in "intrinsic falsity."

Marxism, the Pope wrote, had left behind "a trail of appalling destruction" because it failed to realize that man could not be "merely the product of economic conditions."

ATHEISTS REACT

The encyclical is the highest form of papal writing and addresses all members of the Church. This document is written in a highly academic, professorial style in which the Pope quotes saints, philosophers and writers to make his point.

Atheism has been a hot topic recently thanks to best-selling books questioning the value of religion such as "The God Delusion" by Richard Dawkins and "God is Not Great" by Christopher Hitchens.

The Pope seemed to be addressing the fresh interest in atheism in the developed world with phrases such as: "Let us put it very simply: man needs God, otherwise he remains without hope."

Italy's Union of Atheists, Agnostics and Rationalists (UAAR) said by taking such stands the Pope would push more people away from the Church.

"The existence of a billion non-believers in the world should be enough to make the Pope understand that man can live very well without God, but with reason," a statement said.

The Pope urged Christians to put their hope for a better future in God.

"We have all witnessed the way in which progress, in the wrong hands, can become and has indeed become a terrifying progress in evil. If technical progress is not matched by corresponding progress in man's ethical formation, in man's inner growth, then it is not progress at all, but a threat for man and for the world," he said.

Christian hope also meant protecting the planet, even if people felt powerless to make changes in their lifetimes, he said.

"We can free our life and the world from the poisons and contaminations that could destroy the present and the future. We can uncover the sources of creation and keep them unsullied, and in this way we can make a right use of creation, which comes to us as a gift..." he said.

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 01:32 PM
True knowledge is knowing that you know nothing. :)

That's not knowledge, that's wisdom.

Of which there seems to be a growing shortage in America.

Rohirrim
11-30-2007, 01:36 PM
Religion is a euphemism for superstition.

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 01:42 PM
Religion is a euphemism for superstition.

That is a poorly considered definition.

defenseman
11-30-2007, 02:28 PM
The student is correct in the article....but it's only a point of view. The measurment of thermal units is measuring heat...not cold.

BTU's,,,British Thermal Units to be exact...dman

defenseman
11-30-2007, 02:28 PM
That is a poorly considered definition.

that's putting it mildly..dman

Rohirrim
11-30-2007, 02:29 PM
That is a poorly considered definition.

Not in the least.

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 02:39 PM
Not in the least.

It only shows your ignorance.

defenseman
11-30-2007, 02:47 PM
Just a thought: Me personally, I could care less what one's religion is or if they have none at all, or an aethiest. fine by me. why is it that, those that are aethiest continually attack those with a god? why? Do they desire to force their lack of god on those that have one? Do they feel that society must bend all practices and beliefs to ensure they are included? Including the dismantling of long standing and practiced traditions in our country because they don't like it? what right do they have of doing that? hat's off to Utah and Fort Collins, CO for upholding what the MAJORITY fealt was important to be upheld....dman

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 02:57 PM
Just a thought: Me personally, I could care less what one's religion is or if they have none at all, or an aethiest. fine by me. why is it that, those that are aethiest continually attack those with a god? why? Do they desire to force their lack of god on those that have one? Do they feel that society must bend all practices and beliefs to ensure they are included? Including the dismantling of long standing and practiced traditions in our country because they don't like it? what right do they have of doing that? hat's off to Utah and Fort Collins, CO for upholding what the MAJORITY fealt was important to be upheld....dman

That is, in fact, what democracy is all about.

Rule by the people for the people.

defenseman
11-30-2007, 03:03 PM
That is, in fact, what democracy is all about.

Rule by the people for the people.

True, and again thank god for the Fort Collins city council and the state of Utah for upholding what the majority believes is important to local populace and not knuckling to political correctness. Political Correctness must become a thing of the past, I'm dead sick of it and will fight it at every opportunity...dman

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 03:09 PM
True, and again thank god for the Fort Collins city council and the state of Utah for upholding what the majority believes is important to local populace and not knuckling to political correctness. Political Correctness must become a thing of the past, I'm dead sick of it and will fight it at every opportunity...dman

PC is nothing but a function of modern atheistic secular humanism.

snowspot66
11-30-2007, 03:21 PM
Just a thought: Me personally, I could care less what one's religion is or if they have none at all, or an aethiest. fine by me. why is it that, those that are aethiest continually attack those with a god? why? Do they desire to force their lack of god on those that have one? Do they feel that society must bend all practices and beliefs to ensure they are included? Including the dismantling of long standing and practiced traditions in our country because they don't like it? what right do they have of doing that? hat's off to Utah and Fort Collins, CO for upholding what the MAJORITY fealt was important to be upheld....dman

It's an equal and opposite reaction to centuries of the same or similar actions of those who do believe. Only now athiests are protected and accepted in modern American culture. Their views are no longer considered extremist and taboo. They are free to express them in full public view.

Backlash is a bitch eh?

For the record, I do believe in God.

Rohirrim
11-30-2007, 03:22 PM
It only shows your ignorance.

Hang a rabbit's foot from your mirror or stick a little fish to your bumper. What's the dif?

Hotrod
11-30-2007, 03:24 PM
PC is nothing but a function of modern atheistic secular humanism.

WTF there is simply no reason for language like that on a football site

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 03:27 PM
Hang a rabbit's foot from your mirror or stick a little fish to your bumper. What's the dif?

I hope that you are just fishing, and seriously do not believe this.

epicSocialism4tw
11-30-2007, 03:28 PM
WTF there is simply no reason for language like that on a football site

Ha!

I'll change it up...hows this?

"Dude! PC sucks!"

defenseman
11-30-2007, 03:29 PM
It's an equal and opposite reaction to centuries of the same or similar actions of those who do believe. Only now athiests are protected and accepted in modern American culture. Their views are no longer considered extremist and taboo. They are free to express them in full public view.

Backlash is a b**** eh?

For the record, I do believe in God.

Again, I have no problem with aethiesm. it's their call. i do have a problem with the minority attempting to ruin the party OF EVERYONE, "BECAUSE OF THEIR AETHIESM" and they shouldn't have to deal with nativity displays for example. They don't like it, go somewhere freaking else. The MAJORITY wants the display, you freaking lose. We need more of this type of thing. When they attempt to force their will on the majority in the name of their non-religion, I gotta problem with it. Accepted they believe what the believe, sure. IF they are free to express themselves in "full public view" , then the believers in god and christmas as part of tradition are allowed to do the same thing from where I sit...........dman

Hotrod
11-30-2007, 03:32 PM
Ha!

I'll change it up...hows this?

"Dude! PC sucks!"

There thats better ROFL!

Rohirrim
11-30-2007, 03:43 PM
Just a thought: Me personally, I could care less what one's religion is or if they have none at all, or an aethiest. fine by me. why is it that, those that are aethiest continually attack those with a god? why? Do they desire to force their lack of god on those that have one? Do they feel that society must bend all practices and beliefs to ensure they are included? Including the dismantling of long standing and practiced traditions in our country because they don't like it? what right do they have of doing that? hat's off to Utah and Fort Collins, CO for upholding what the MAJORITY fealt was important to be upheld....dman

God knows what you're talking about. ;)

BTW, the pope is full of it. Why blame poor Karl Marx? Nobody, and I do mean NOBODY, has ever instituted or practiced Marx's concept of communism. In the first place, his concept was that true communism would be an eventual evolution out of capitalism, but that capitalism would be successful for a very long time before that occurred. If Lenin, Stalin and Mao really wanted to follow Marx's thought, they would have allowed their countries to evolve from feudal agriculturism to industrial capitalism and then allowed capitalism to run its course, however long it took. Of course, none of them were true communists. They were dictators.

Maybe he's referring to Marx saying that "Religion is the opiate of the people?" By that he meant that it was the "...sigh of the oppressed." It was the pain killer for feudal laborers who had no hope. Of course, the Catholic Church has always had it in for anybody who disagrees with its predominance, be it Luther, the Freemasons (of which the majority of The Founders were members), or Marx.

BABronco
11-30-2007, 03:46 PM
I got 10$ on science.

Good thing science keeps proving religion... atleast one of em..

defenseman
11-30-2007, 03:50 PM
God knows what you're talking about. ;)

BTW, the pope is full of it. Why blame poor Karl Marx? Nobody, and I do mean NOBODY, has ever instituted or practiced Marx's concept of communism. In the first place, his concept was that true communism would be an eventual evolution out of capitalism, but that capitalism would be successful for a very long time before that occurred. If Lenin, Stalin and Mao really wanted to follow Marx's thought, they would have allowed their countries to evolve from feudal agriculturism to industrial capitalism and then allowed capitalism to run its course, however long it took. Of course, none of them were true communists. They were dictators.

Maybe he's referring to Marx saying that "Religion is the opiate of the people?" By that he meant that it was the "...sigh of the oppressed." It was the pain killer for feudal laborers who had no hope. Of course, the Catholic Church has always had it in for anybody who disagrees with its predominance, be it Luther, the Freemasons (of which the majority of The Founders were members), or Marx.

I'm not communists, never will be, raised a catholic but honestly could care less what the pope says, and am quite honestly considering joining the freemasons. I'm just tired of the PC and secular progressiveness creeping into society, that's it in a nutshell. Lots of folks of my ilk are tired of the PC and SP, and it's going to start showing. But, enough of this. I'm about fried on correspondence of this nature today, so I'll give you a break..dman