HEAV
10-08-2007, 02:53 PM
DENVER -- Denver Broncos running back Travis Henry, who could be suspended for a year after reportedly testing positive for marijuana use, may have trouble successfully suing the NFL to keep his job, Fox 31’s Josina Anderson reported Monday.
On Monday, a highly placed NFL source told Anderson that Henry did, in fact, have a toxicologist present during the testing of the running back’s B urine sample. However, the league objected to this particular toxicologist because he was affiliated with a lab with competing interests, the source said.
As a result, Henry’s lawyers had another expert witness the testing of his urine sample, the source told Anderson.
The A sample had already tested positive for marijuana and the B sample was being tested to confirm the initial finding. If confirmed, Henry could be subject to a one-year suspension from the league.
Henry, 28, was suspended for four games after testing positive for marijuana use during the 2005 season as a member of the Tennessee Titans. He was also forced to enter the league’s substance abuse program.
Neither Henry’s lawyer nor agent could be reached for comment on this latest development and a call to Travis Henry himself was not immediately returned.
Over the weekend, ESPN’s Chris Mortensen reported that Henry has offered to take a lie-detector test and submit a hair sample and to try and prove that the NFL-administered drug test produced a false positive.
The NFL does not normally allow for the testing of hair samples to prove a players’ guilt or innocence.
“That’s not part of what they do. The league is not going to set a precedent by [testing Henry’s hair sample,” the NFL source told Anderson.
Henry’s attempts to overturn the results of the drug test appear to be desperate.
“It’s just a delay tactic,” the source said. “I don’t blame him, but that’s what it is.”
http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4577786&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
On Monday, a highly placed NFL source told Anderson that Henry did, in fact, have a toxicologist present during the testing of the running back’s B urine sample. However, the league objected to this particular toxicologist because he was affiliated with a lab with competing interests, the source said.
As a result, Henry’s lawyers had another expert witness the testing of his urine sample, the source told Anderson.
The A sample had already tested positive for marijuana and the B sample was being tested to confirm the initial finding. If confirmed, Henry could be subject to a one-year suspension from the league.
Henry, 28, was suspended for four games after testing positive for marijuana use during the 2005 season as a member of the Tennessee Titans. He was also forced to enter the league’s substance abuse program.
Neither Henry’s lawyer nor agent could be reached for comment on this latest development and a call to Travis Henry himself was not immediately returned.
Over the weekend, ESPN’s Chris Mortensen reported that Henry has offered to take a lie-detector test and submit a hair sample and to try and prove that the NFL-administered drug test produced a false positive.
The NFL does not normally allow for the testing of hair samples to prove a players’ guilt or innocence.
“That’s not part of what they do. The league is not going to set a precedent by [testing Henry’s hair sample,” the NFL source told Anderson.
Henry’s attempts to overturn the results of the drug test appear to be desperate.
“It’s just a delay tactic,” the source said. “I don’t blame him, but that’s what it is.”
http://www.myfoxcolorado.com/myfox/pages/News/Detail?contentId=4577786&version=1&locale=EN-US&layoutCode=TSTY&pageId=3.2.1
