PDA

View Full Version : Iowa Independant Managing Editor: Ron Paul could win Iowa


Taco John
10-05-2007, 03:51 AM
October 4th, 2007 — 6:54 pm

Ron Paul Could Win Iowa

I’m somewhat surprised to be saying this, and it took me a while to come to this conclusion, but I think — given the right set of circumstances — Republican Rep. Ron Paul could win the Iowa Caucuses. I’m not going to say it’s likely, but it isn’t impossible.

Here’s why it could happen:

Huge fundraising: Rep. Paul’s third quarter fundraising was astonishing. If he spends it right (and so far his campaign has proven its ability to stretch every single dollar), he could have enough direct mail and paid media to look like just as “real” a candidate as any others in the eyes of Iowa Republicans.

Good organization: The Paul campaign recently announced that it had brought on veteran Iowa Republican Dr. Drew Ivers as its new Iowa chairman. Ivers has worked in Iowa GOP politics since the Reagan campaign, and he ran Iowa presidential campaigns for Pat Robertson and Pat Buchanan. Asked what he was planning to do to change the Paul campaign in Iowa, Ivers smartly said (http://www.iowaindependent.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=1203), “the main difference between our strategies is that the old Iowa campaign chair] used a traditional media campaign, whereas I intend to use more of a grass-roots, on-the-ground strategy.” That’s how you win the Iowa Caucuses.

Splintered electorate: Because the evangelicals who dominate the Republican caucuses seem to be splitting between a number of different candidates, Ron Paul’s — ahem — “uniqueness” could serve him quite well. In particular, Paul is the only Republican candidate with a strong anti-war message, and survey results show that half of likely Republican caucus goers agree with him (http://cmondisplay.com/2007/08/23/51-of-republican-caucus-goers-support-iraq-withdrawal-within-six-months/). With a field this large, Paul may only need support of half of the anti-war Republicans — which would represent 25% of the total electorate — to win a plurality of delegates.

Low expectations: The media will not expect Rep. Paul to place in the Iowa Caucuses, to say nothing of whether they think he can win. The three points listed above are intended to demonstrate that he could come in first here with some luck and elbow grease, but it is important to remember that a second or third place finish would be enough to call it a “win.” Just by placing, Ron Paul would get the Iowa bump.


http://cmondisplay.com/2007/10/04/ron-paul-could-win-iowa/

Taco John
10-05-2007, 03:55 AM
August 23rd, 2007 — 12:25 pm
51% of (Iowa) Republican Caucus Goers Support Iraq Withdrawal Within Six Months
Greg Sargent at TPM Election Central noticed this nugget in the latest Strategic Vision poll of likely caucus goers:

4. Do you favor a withdrawal of all United States military from Iraq within the next six months? (Republicans Only)
Yes 51%
No 39%
Undecided 10%

Frankly, the number does not surprise me. Candidates who have more hard-line positions on the war avoid wearing their positions on their sleeves when they are in town, and I think that while immigration hurt McCain here, his outspoken support of the surge caused him just as much trouble over the past six months. Iowa Republicans are social conservatives, not hawks.
Also worth noting — and this is something Greg Sargent misses in his write-up — is that the poll screen intended only to include caucus going Republicans, not Republicans as a whole, and the results may have been different had the screen been wider. Still, though, among the most influential group of Republicans in the state, support for withdrawal is high.
http://cmondisplay.com/2007/08/23/51-of-republican-caucus-goers-support-iraq-withdrawal-within-six-months/

baja
10-05-2007, 04:31 AM
Go Ron Go.

FrontRowSeat1
10-05-2007, 07:17 AM
And I may win the lottery but I think old crazy Ron has a worse chance. The guy is a poobie.

Taco John
10-05-2007, 10:12 AM
It's a simple matter of mathematics. When you have more people who are willing to vote for you than the other guy does, you win the election.

Rohirrim
10-05-2007, 10:48 AM
It's a simple matter of mathematics. When you have more people who are willing to vote for you than the other guy does, you win the election.

Unless your opponent happens to own the voting machines. :wiggle:

Like Stalin said, "It's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes."

Taco John
10-05-2007, 11:27 AM
I'm not that cynical. I think that the voting machines are probably legit. I'm more concerned about voter suppression tactics, like suddenly closing primaries so that independants can't vote for Ron Paul.

Taco John
10-05-2007, 02:41 PM
I just can't help myself... I love this man:

<embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LH0pFuoJt3I&rel=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed>


I have never been so excited about a politician in all my life.